Factors Associated with Alternate Level of Care Status Designation: a Case-Control Study and Model to Optimize Care Trajectories.

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-03 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.5770/cgj.27.697
Marianne Lamarre, Myriam Daignault, Vincent Weng-Jy Cheung, Marie-France Forget, Quoc Dinh Nguyen
{"title":"Factors Associated with Alternate Level of Care Status Designation: a Case-Control Study and Model to Optimize Care Trajectories.","authors":"Marianne Lamarre, Myriam Daignault, Vincent Weng-Jy Cheung, Marie-France Forget, Quoc Dinh Nguyen","doi":"10.5770/cgj.27.697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As health-care demand is growing, our health-care system will require the optimization of the care trajectories. Patients with an alternate level of care (ALC) status could be a target for flow optimization. We aimed to characterize ALC patients and risk factors for ALC status, and to propose an integrated model to analyze the trajectory of ALC patients and discuss solutions to reduce their burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control design was used to compare 60 ALC and 60 non-ALC patients admitted to the geriatric unit of the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal in 2021, collecting medical and sociodemographic data. Based on our model, univariate statistical analyses were computed to compare groups and identify risk factors for ALC status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ALC patients were less independent (22% performed five to six activities of daily living vs. 43%, <i>p</i> = .03). Both groups were comparable in terms of mobility and neurocognitive disorders. ALC patients were more likely to receive a new diagnosis of a neurocognitive disorder or new behavioural or psychological symptoms (37% vs. 15%, <i>p</i> = .008). Up to 25% of ALC patients were admitted despite presenting no active medical condition (vs. 3% of non-ALC patients, <i>p</i> = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimization of the care trajectory of ALC patients is mainly based on pre-hospital and post-hospital factors. A proportion of ALC admissions might be avoidable with additional investment in home care resources and relocation procedures. Fluidity of ALC trajectory may benefit from improved orientation at discharge procedures. Full optimization of ALC trajectories requires a systemic understanding of the health-care system.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"27 2","pages":"152-158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11100979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.27.697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As health-care demand is growing, our health-care system will require the optimization of the care trajectories. Patients with an alternate level of care (ALC) status could be a target for flow optimization. We aimed to characterize ALC patients and risk factors for ALC status, and to propose an integrated model to analyze the trajectory of ALC patients and discuss solutions to reduce their burden.

Methods: A case-control design was used to compare 60 ALC and 60 non-ALC patients admitted to the geriatric unit of the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal in 2021, collecting medical and sociodemographic data. Based on our model, univariate statistical analyses were computed to compare groups and identify risk factors for ALC status.

Results: ALC patients were less independent (22% performed five to six activities of daily living vs. 43%, p = .03). Both groups were comparable in terms of mobility and neurocognitive disorders. ALC patients were more likely to receive a new diagnosis of a neurocognitive disorder or new behavioural or psychological symptoms (37% vs. 15%, p = .008). Up to 25% of ALC patients were admitted despite presenting no active medical condition (vs. 3% of non-ALC patients, p = .002).

Conclusions: The optimization of the care trajectory of ALC patients is mainly based on pre-hospital and post-hospital factors. A proportion of ALC admissions might be avoidable with additional investment in home care resources and relocation procedures. Fluidity of ALC trajectory may benefit from improved orientation at discharge procedures. Full optimization of ALC trajectories requires a systemic understanding of the health-care system.

指定替代护理级别的相关因素:病例对照研究和优化护理轨迹模型。
背景:随着医疗保健需求的不断增长,我们的医疗保健系统需要优化护理路径。具有替代护理级别(ALC)状态的患者可能是流程优化的目标。我们的目的是描述 ALC 患者的特征和 ALC 状态的风险因素,并提出一个综合模型来分析 ALC 患者的轨迹,探讨减轻其负担的解决方案:采用病例对照设计,对2021年蒙特利尔大学中心医院老年病科收治的60名ALC患者和60名非ALC患者进行比较,收集医疗和社会人口学数据。根据我们的模型,我们进行了单变量统计分析,以比较不同组别并确定ALC状态的风险因素:ALC患者的独立性较差(22%的患者能进行五到六次日常生活活动,43%的患者不能,P = .03)。两组患者在活动能力和神经认知障碍方面不相上下。ALC患者更有可能接受新的神经认知障碍诊断或出现新的行为或心理症状(37% vs. 15%,p = .008)。高达25%的ALC患者在没有活动性疾病的情况下入院(与非ALC患者的3%相比,p = .002):结论:ALC患者护理轨迹的优化主要基于入院前和入院后的因素。如果能在家庭护理资源和搬迁程序上增加投入,可能会避免一部分 ALC 患者入院。改善出院程序时的引导可能会使 ALC 的轨迹更加流畅。ALC 轨迹的全面优化需要对医疗保健系统有系统的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信