Percutaneous needle tenotomies: indications, procedures, efficacy and safety. A systematic review

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Hugo Bessaguet , Paul Calmels , Alexis Schnitzler , Flavia Coroian , Pascal Giraux , Florence Angioni , Ahmed Adham , Philippe Denormandie , Romain David , Etienne Ojardias
{"title":"Percutaneous needle tenotomies: indications, procedures, efficacy and safety. A systematic review","authors":"Hugo Bessaguet ,&nbsp;Paul Calmels ,&nbsp;Alexis Schnitzler ,&nbsp;Flavia Coroian ,&nbsp;Pascal Giraux ,&nbsp;Florence Angioni ,&nbsp;Ahmed Adham ,&nbsp;Philippe Denormandie ,&nbsp;Romain David ,&nbsp;Etienne Ojardias","doi":"10.1016/j.rehab.2024.101839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Percutaneous needle tenotomies constitute a promising approach that enables direct access to tendons through minimally invasive interventions. They can be performed rapidly without need for large incisions or general anaesthesia. However, the reported procedures are heterogeneous and currently conducted without guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We aimed to determine the indications for percutaneous needle tenotomies described in the current literature. Our secondary aim was to identify the different procedures reported, as well as their efficacy and their safety.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted to identify original articles that mentioned percutaneous needle tenotomy in humans and reported its application, description, effectiveness or adverse events. Non-percutaneous tendinous surgical procedures and ineligible designs were excluded. The Downs and Black checklist was used to assess the risk of bias.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 540 studies were identified from the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PEDro databases. Fourteen clinical studies met the inclusion criteria and were found to have an acceptable quality (674 individuals, 1664 tenotomies). Our results indicated a wide variety of indications for percutaneous needle tenotomies in children and in adults. We highlighted 24 tendons as eligible targets in the upper and lower limbs. Tenotomies were performed with either 16- or 18-Ga needles, lasted from 1 to 30 min, and were performed using various procedures. Their efficacy was mainly assessed through clinical outcomes highlighting tendon discontinuity on palpation after the procedure. Passive range-of-motion gains after tenotomy were reported for both upper and lower limbs with an estimated 5 % complication rate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This is the first review to systematically synthesize all the available evidence on the indications, procedures, efficacy and safety of percutaneous tenotomies exclusively performed with needles. Current evidence suggests that procedures are safe and effective for treating various deformities.</p></div><div><h3>PROSPERO registration</h3><p>CRD42022350571</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"67 5","pages":"Article 101839"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187706572400023X/pdfft?md5=9976ccc5bda6621b49faee6dff6c3cef&pid=1-s2.0-S187706572400023X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187706572400023X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous needle tenotomies constitute a promising approach that enables direct access to tendons through minimally invasive interventions. They can be performed rapidly without need for large incisions or general anaesthesia. However, the reported procedures are heterogeneous and currently conducted without guidelines.

Objectives

We aimed to determine the indications for percutaneous needle tenotomies described in the current literature. Our secondary aim was to identify the different procedures reported, as well as their efficacy and their safety.

Methods

A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted to identify original articles that mentioned percutaneous needle tenotomy in humans and reported its application, description, effectiveness or adverse events. Non-percutaneous tendinous surgical procedures and ineligible designs were excluded. The Downs and Black checklist was used to assess the risk of bias.

Results

A total of 540 studies were identified from the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PEDro databases. Fourteen clinical studies met the inclusion criteria and were found to have an acceptable quality (674 individuals, 1664 tenotomies). Our results indicated a wide variety of indications for percutaneous needle tenotomies in children and in adults. We highlighted 24 tendons as eligible targets in the upper and lower limbs. Tenotomies were performed with either 16- or 18-Ga needles, lasted from 1 to 30 min, and were performed using various procedures. Their efficacy was mainly assessed through clinical outcomes highlighting tendon discontinuity on palpation after the procedure. Passive range-of-motion gains after tenotomy were reported for both upper and lower limbs with an estimated 5 % complication rate.

Conclusion

This is the first review to systematically synthesize all the available evidence on the indications, procedures, efficacy and safety of percutaneous tenotomies exclusively performed with needles. Current evidence suggests that procedures are safe and effective for treating various deformities.

PROSPERO registration

CRD42022350571

经皮穿刺腱切开术:适应症、程序、疗效和安全性。系统综述。
背景:经皮穿刺针腱切开术是一种很有前途的方法,可通过微创介入直接接触肌腱。这种方法无需大切口或全身麻醉即可快速实施。然而,目前所报道的手术方法不尽相同,而且没有相关指南:我们旨在确定现有文献中描述的经皮穿刺针腱切开术的适应症。我们的第二目的是确定所报道的不同手术方法,以及它们的有效性和安全性:我们按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统性回顾,以确定提及经皮穿刺针腱切开术并报告其应用、描述、有效性或不良事件的原创文章。非经皮肌腱外科手术和不符合要求的设计均被排除在外。结果:结果:从 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 PEDro 数据库中共筛选出 540 项研究。有 14 项临床研究符合纳入标准,且质量合格(674 人,1664 次腱鞘切开术)。我们的研究结果表明,儿童和成人经皮穿刺腱切开术的适应症多种多样。我们将 24 条肌腱列为上肢和下肢的合格目标。腱切开术使用16Ga或18Ga针头,持续时间从1分钟到30分钟不等,并采用了不同的手术方法。其疗效主要通过术后触诊肌腱不连续的临床结果进行评估。据报道,腱切开术后上下肢的被动活动范围均有所扩大,并发症发生率约为5%:这是第一篇系统综合了所有可用证据的综述,涉及完全使用针头进行经皮腱鞘切开术的适应症、程序、疗效和安全性。目前的证据表明,经皮腱鞘切开术在治疗各种畸形方面安全有效:CRD42022350571。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine covers all areas of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine; such as: methods of evaluation of motor, sensory, cognitive and visceral impairments; acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain; disabilities in adult and children ; processes of rehabilitation in orthopaedic, rhumatological, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary and urological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信