Discussing the midwifery scope of practice within the NANDA-I taxonomy.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Sandra P Souto, Ana Paula Prata, Rosemeire S Albuquerque, Sílvia Caldeira
{"title":"Discussing the midwifery scope of practice within the NANDA-I taxonomy.","authors":"Sandra P Souto, Ana Paula Prata, Rosemeire S Albuquerque, Sílvia Caldeira","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.12473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To discuss the midwifery scope of practice within the NANDA-I taxonomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Review of the NANDA-I taxonomy followed by critical analysis of the nursing diagnoses (NDs) within the scope of midwifery practice. Search terms were defined. Two authors independently analyzed all diagnoses, and another author validated the results.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 267 NDs in the NANDA-I taxonomy, 39 (14.6%) perceived a relationship with midwifery's scope of practice, and among these, 15 (5.6%) guaranteed greater specificity and accuracy for clinical reasoning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The suitability of NDs for the broad spectrum of the midwifery scope of practice may need to be completed. Women's responses to life events and health conditions are simultaneously complex and specific, and many NDs in the NANDA-I terminology may be far from fully identified and developed to represent these responses.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing practice: </strong>Improvements in NANDA-I diagnosis would contribute to advanced terminology and increased specificity and accuracy of the diagnostic process. This is important in achieving appropriate outcomes and safe and effective interventions for which the nurses and nurse-midwives are accountable. Many NDs would not necessarily be used in any other context since they are specific to midwifery; however, it would help to develop a NANDA-I taxonomy that is more inclusive and comprehensive internationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To discuss the midwifery scope of practice within the NANDA-I taxonomy.

Methods: Review of the NANDA-I taxonomy followed by critical analysis of the nursing diagnoses (NDs) within the scope of midwifery practice. Search terms were defined. Two authors independently analyzed all diagnoses, and another author validated the results.

Findings: Of the 267 NDs in the NANDA-I taxonomy, 39 (14.6%) perceived a relationship with midwifery's scope of practice, and among these, 15 (5.6%) guaranteed greater specificity and accuracy for clinical reasoning.

Conclusions: The suitability of NDs for the broad spectrum of the midwifery scope of practice may need to be completed. Women's responses to life events and health conditions are simultaneously complex and specific, and many NDs in the NANDA-I terminology may be far from fully identified and developed to represent these responses.

Implications for nursing practice: Improvements in NANDA-I diagnosis would contribute to advanced terminology and increased specificity and accuracy of the diagnostic process. This is important in achieving appropriate outcomes and safe and effective interventions for which the nurses and nurse-midwives are accountable. Many NDs would not necessarily be used in any other context since they are specific to midwifery; however, it would help to develop a NANDA-I taxonomy that is more inclusive and comprehensive internationally.

讨论 NANDA-I 分类法中的助产士执业范围。
目的:讨论 NANDA-I 分类法中的助产士执业范围:回顾 NANDA-I 分类法,然后对助产士执业范围内的护理诊断 (ND) 进行批判性分析。定义了检索词。两位作者对所有诊断进行了独立分析,另一位作者对结果进行了验证:在 NANDA-I 分类中的 267 个 ND 中,39 个(14.6%)认为与助产士的实践范围有关,其中 15 个(5.6%)保证了临床推理的更高特异性和准确性:结论:无疫医生是否适合助产士的广泛执业范围可能还需要进一步完善。妇女对生活事件和健康状况的反应同时具有复杂性和特殊性,NANDA-I术语中的许多ND可能远未完全确定和发展以代表这些反应:改进 NANDA-I 诊断将有助于改进术语,提高诊断过程的特异性和准确性。这对取得适当的结果和安全有效的干预措施非常重要,护士和助产士对此负有责任。许多 ND 不一定会在任何其他情况下使用,因为它们是助产专有的;不过,这将有助于制定一个在国际上更具包容性和综合性的 NANDA-I 分类法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信