Factors influencing central nervous system medication deprescribing and behavior change in hospitalized older adults

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Juliessa M. Pavon MD, MHS, Audrey D. Zhang MD, Laura J. Fish PhD, Margaret Falkovic MSW, Cathleen S. Colón-Emeric MD, MHS, David M. Gallagher MD, Kenneth E. Schmader MD, S. Nicole Hastings MD, MHS
{"title":"Factors influencing central nervous system medication deprescribing and behavior change in hospitalized older adults","authors":"Juliessa M. Pavon MD, MHS,&nbsp;Audrey D. Zhang MD,&nbsp;Laura J. Fish PhD,&nbsp;Margaret Falkovic MSW,&nbsp;Cathleen S. Colón-Emeric MD, MHS,&nbsp;David M. Gallagher MD,&nbsp;Kenneth E. Schmader MD,&nbsp;S. Nicole Hastings MD, MHS","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Central nervous system (CNS) medications are linked to higher morbidity and mortality in older adults. Hospitalization allows for deprescribing opportunities. This qualitative study investigates clinician and patient perspectives on CNS medication deprescribing during hospitalization using a behavioral change framework, aiming to inform interventions and identify recommendations to enhance hospital deprescribing processes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This qualitative study focused on hospitalists, primary care providers, pharmacists, and patients aged ≥60 years hospitalized on a general medicine service and prescribed ≥1 CNS medications. Using semi-structured interviews and focus groups, we aimed to evaluate patient medication knowledge, prior deprescribing experiences, and decision-making preferences, as well as provider processes and tools for medication evaluation and deprescribing. Rapid qualitative analysis applying the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior (COM-B) framework revealed themes influencing deprescribing behavior in patients and providers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 52 participants (20 patients and 32 providers) identified facilitators and barriers across deprescribing steps and generated recommended strategies to address them. Clinicians and patients highlighted the opportunity for CNS medication deprescribing during hospitalizations, facilitated by multidisciplinary teams enhancing clinicians' capability to make medication changes. Both groups also stressed the importance of intensive patient engagement, education, and monitoring during hospitalizations, acknowledging challenges in timing and extent of deprescribing, with some patients preferring decisions deferred to outpatient clinicians. Hospitalist and pharmacist recommendations centered on early pharmacist involvement for medication reconciliation, expanding pharmacy consultation and clinician education on deprescribing, whereas patients recommended enhancing shared decision-making through patient education on medication adverse effects, tapering plans, and alternatives. Hospitalists and PCPs also emphasized standardized discharge instructions and transitional care calls to improve medication review and feedback during care transitions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Clinicians and patients highlighted the potential advantages of hospital interventions for CNS medication deprescribing, emphasizing the necessity of addressing communication, education, and coordination challenges between inpatient and outpatient settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Central nervous system (CNS) medications are linked to higher morbidity and mortality in older adults. Hospitalization allows for deprescribing opportunities. This qualitative study investigates clinician and patient perspectives on CNS medication deprescribing during hospitalization using a behavioral change framework, aiming to inform interventions and identify recommendations to enhance hospital deprescribing processes.

Methods

This qualitative study focused on hospitalists, primary care providers, pharmacists, and patients aged ≥60 years hospitalized on a general medicine service and prescribed ≥1 CNS medications. Using semi-structured interviews and focus groups, we aimed to evaluate patient medication knowledge, prior deprescribing experiences, and decision-making preferences, as well as provider processes and tools for medication evaluation and deprescribing. Rapid qualitative analysis applying the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior (COM-B) framework revealed themes influencing deprescribing behavior in patients and providers.

Results

A total of 52 participants (20 patients and 32 providers) identified facilitators and barriers across deprescribing steps and generated recommended strategies to address them. Clinicians and patients highlighted the opportunity for CNS medication deprescribing during hospitalizations, facilitated by multidisciplinary teams enhancing clinicians' capability to make medication changes. Both groups also stressed the importance of intensive patient engagement, education, and monitoring during hospitalizations, acknowledging challenges in timing and extent of deprescribing, with some patients preferring decisions deferred to outpatient clinicians. Hospitalist and pharmacist recommendations centered on early pharmacist involvement for medication reconciliation, expanding pharmacy consultation and clinician education on deprescribing, whereas patients recommended enhancing shared decision-making through patient education on medication adverse effects, tapering plans, and alternatives. Hospitalists and PCPs also emphasized standardized discharge instructions and transitional care calls to improve medication review and feedback during care transitions.

Conclusions

Clinicians and patients highlighted the potential advantages of hospital interventions for CNS medication deprescribing, emphasizing the necessity of addressing communication, education, and coordination challenges between inpatient and outpatient settings.

影响住院老年人中枢神经系统减药和行为改变的因素。
背景:中枢神经系统(CNS)药物与老年人较高的发病率和死亡率有关。住院治疗为减药提供了机会。本定性研究采用行为改变框架,调查了临床医生和患者对住院期间中枢神经系统药物处方的看法,旨在为干预措施提供信息,并为加强医院处方流程提出建议:这项定性研究的重点是住院医生、初级保健提供者、药剂师和年龄≥60 岁、在普通内科住院治疗且处方中枢神经系统药物≥1 种的患者。通过半结构化访谈和焦点小组,我们旨在评估患者的用药知识、之前的停药经验和决策偏好,以及医疗服务提供者的用药评估和停药流程和工具。应用能力、机会、动机和行为(COM-B)框架进行的快速定性分析揭示了影响患者和医疗服务提供者处方行为的主题:结果:共有 52 名参与者(20 名患者和 32 名医疗服务提供者)确定了处方步骤中的促进因素和障碍,并提出了解决这些问题的建议策略。临床医生和患者都强调了住院期间中枢神经系统药物去处方化的机会,多学科团队可提高临床医生进行药物改变的能力。两组人员还强调了住院期间加强患者参与、教育和监测的重要性,并承认在取消处方的时机和范围方面存在挑战,一些患者更希望由门诊临床医生做出决定。住院医生和药剂师的建议主要集中在药剂师尽早参与药物协调、扩大药学咨询和临床医生的减药教育,而患者则建议通过对患者进行有关药物不良反应、减药计划和替代方案的教育来加强共同决策。住院医生和初级保健医生还强调了标准化的出院指导和过渡护理电话,以改善护理过渡期间的药物审查和反馈:临床医生和患者都强调了医院干预中枢神经系统药物减量的潜在优势,同时强调了解决住院和门诊环境之间沟通、教育和协调难题的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信