Obesity and Penetrating Trauma: Outcomes from a Level 1 Trauma Center in New York City.

IF 1.5 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Open Access Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S453589
Albert Yao, Jaiden I Busso, Nisha Lakhi
{"title":"Obesity and Penetrating Trauma: Outcomes from a Level 1 Trauma Center in New York City.","authors":"Albert Yao, Jaiden I Busso, Nisha Lakhi","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S453589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in trauma scenarios; however, there has been conflicting evidence on outcomes of obesity and penetrating injuries, specifically gunshot wounds and stab wounds. We hypothesized that obesity may be protective due to a \"cushioning effect\" attributed to increased adiposity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to a Level 1 Trauma Center with a penetrating trauma (gunshot/stab) injury during 2008-2021. Patients with a BMI ≥ 30 were compared to those with a BMI < 30. The primary outcome was Injury Severity Score (ISS). Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, days on ventilation, length of hospital stay, service of admission (trauma surgery, general surgery, discharged home, general medical floor), the body region of injury(s), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), OR requirement, type of surgery, and discharge status. Statistical analysis was performed using χ<sup>2</sup>-test or Fisher's exact tests for categorical data, and Student's <i>t</i>-test or Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test for continuous variables with <i>p</i> < 0.05 as statistically significant. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the mechanism of injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 721 patients that met inclusion criteria, of which 540 were classified in the non-obese group and 181 (25.1%) in the obese group. The primary outcome, mean ISS score, in obese patients (9.0, SD = 13.0) and non-obese patients (9.4, SD = 13.8) was similar between groups respectively. Secondary outcomes, which included rates of severe abdominal injury (AIS ≥ 3), rates of intra-abdominal organ injury, and rates of gastro-intestinal resection, were also similar between non-obese and obese patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study did not demonstrate the existence of a \"cushioning effect\" in the setting of penetrating traumatic injury. Patients with increased BMI had similar a ISS score and patterns of injury as their non-obese counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11144413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S453589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obesity is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in trauma scenarios; however, there has been conflicting evidence on outcomes of obesity and penetrating injuries, specifically gunshot wounds and stab wounds. We hypothesized that obesity may be protective due to a "cushioning effect" attributed to increased adiposity.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to a Level 1 Trauma Center with a penetrating trauma (gunshot/stab) injury during 2008-2021. Patients with a BMI ≥ 30 were compared to those with a BMI < 30. The primary outcome was Injury Severity Score (ISS). Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, days on ventilation, length of hospital stay, service of admission (trauma surgery, general surgery, discharged home, general medical floor), the body region of injury(s), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), OR requirement, type of surgery, and discharge status. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2-test or Fisher's exact tests for categorical data, and Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables with p < 0.05 as statistically significant. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the mechanism of injury.

Results: There were 721 patients that met inclusion criteria, of which 540 were classified in the non-obese group and 181 (25.1%) in the obese group. The primary outcome, mean ISS score, in obese patients (9.0, SD = 13.0) and non-obese patients (9.4, SD = 13.8) was similar between groups respectively. Secondary outcomes, which included rates of severe abdominal injury (AIS ≥ 3), rates of intra-abdominal organ injury, and rates of gastro-intestinal resection, were also similar between non-obese and obese patients.

Conclusion: This study did not demonstrate the existence of a "cushioning effect" in the setting of penetrating traumatic injury. Patients with increased BMI had similar a ISS score and patterns of injury as their non-obese counterparts.

肥胖与穿透性创伤:纽约市一级创伤中心的成果。
背景:肥胖与创伤情况下发病率和死亡率的增加有关;然而,关于肥胖与穿透性损伤(尤其是枪伤和刀伤)的结果,证据并不一致。我们假设,肥胖可能具有保护作用,因为肥胖增加了 "缓冲效应":这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是 2008-2021 年间因穿透性创伤(枪伤/刀伤)前往一级创伤中心就诊的患者。将体重指数≥30的患者与体重指数<30的患者进行比较。主要结果是受伤严重程度评分(ISS)。次要结果包括重症监护室(ICU)住院时间、通气天数、住院时间、入院服务(创伤外科、普通外科、出院回家、普通内科楼层)、受伤部位、简略损伤量表(AIS)、手术室需求、手术类型和出院情况。对分类数据采用χ2检验或费雪精确检验进行统计分析,对连续变量采用学生t检验或曼-惠特尼U检验,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。根据损伤机制进行分组分析:共有 721 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 540 人属于非肥胖组,181 人(25.1%)属于肥胖组。肥胖组(9.0,SD = 13.0)和非肥胖组(9.4,SD = 13.8)的主要结果(ISS 平均得分)相似。次要结果包括严重腹部损伤率(AIS ≥ 3)、腹腔内脏器损伤率和胃肠道切除率,非肥胖患者和肥胖患者的次要结果也相似:结论:本研究并未证明穿透性创伤存在 "缓冲效应"。结论:本研究并未证明在穿透性创伤中存在 "缓冲效应",体重指数增加的患者与非肥胖患者的 ISS 评分和损伤模式相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信