Evaluation of the EMA log kow trigger for fish BCF testing based on data for several human pharmaceuticals

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Lisa A. Constantine , Natalie Burden , Todd Davidson , David G. Dolan , Gemma Janer , Andreas Häner , Michael R. Lee , Samuel K. Maynard , Erick Nfon , Alison Nimrod Perkins , James J. Ryan , Joan Tell
{"title":"Evaluation of the EMA log kow trigger for fish BCF testing based on data for several human pharmaceuticals","authors":"Lisa A. Constantine ,&nbsp;Natalie Burden ,&nbsp;Todd Davidson ,&nbsp;David G. Dolan ,&nbsp;Gemma Janer ,&nbsp;Andreas Häner ,&nbsp;Michael R. Lee ,&nbsp;Samuel K. Maynard ,&nbsp;Erick Nfon ,&nbsp;Alison Nimrod Perkins ,&nbsp;James J. Ryan ,&nbsp;Joan Tell","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the European Medicines Agency (EMA) “Guideline for Environmental Risk Assessment of Medicinal Products for Human Use,” a fish bioconcentration factor (BCF) study is triggered in Phase I for pharmaceuticals having log Kow &gt;4.5, to support Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity (PBT) screening, and in Phase II to assess secondary poisoning and bioaccumulation (‘B’) potential when log Kow ≥3. The standard sampling schedule outlined in OECD Test Guideline 305 (TG305) may require assessment of approximately 200 fish following exposure to low- and high-test concentrations and a negative control. We report experimental log Kow and BCF values for 64 human pharmaceuticals that were used to evaluate the current BCF testing trigger of log Kow ≥3, and whether a single BCF exposure concentration allows accurate classification of bioaccumulation potential. Our data support raising the BCF testing trigger to log Kow ≥4, and use of a single test concentration. The resulting reduction in the use of fish is consistent with the 3 R s principle and did not adversely affect classification accuracy. An assessment of potential risk of secondary poisoning was also conducted for three drugs classified as either B or vB, and no risks were identified.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 105651"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024000928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the European Medicines Agency (EMA) “Guideline for Environmental Risk Assessment of Medicinal Products for Human Use,” a fish bioconcentration factor (BCF) study is triggered in Phase I for pharmaceuticals having log Kow >4.5, to support Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity (PBT) screening, and in Phase II to assess secondary poisoning and bioaccumulation (‘B’) potential when log Kow ≥3. The standard sampling schedule outlined in OECD Test Guideline 305 (TG305) may require assessment of approximately 200 fish following exposure to low- and high-test concentrations and a negative control. We report experimental log Kow and BCF values for 64 human pharmaceuticals that were used to evaluate the current BCF testing trigger of log Kow ≥3, and whether a single BCF exposure concentration allows accurate classification of bioaccumulation potential. Our data support raising the BCF testing trigger to log Kow ≥4, and use of a single test concentration. The resulting reduction in the use of fish is consistent with the 3 R s principle and did not adversely affect classification accuracy. An assessment of potential risk of secondary poisoning was also conducted for three drugs classified as either B or vB, and no risks were identified.

根据几种人类药物的数据评估鱼类生物浓缩系数测试的 EMA 对数/辛醇/水分配系数触发器。
在欧洲药品管理局 (EMA) 的《人用医药产品环境风险评估指南》中,对于辛醇/水分配系数对数 > 4.5 的药品,在第一阶段需要进行鱼类生物富集系数 (BCF) 研究,以支持持久性、生物蓄积性和毒性 (PBT) 筛选;当辛醇/水分配系数对数≥3 时,在第二阶段需要评估二次中毒和生物蓄积性("B")潜力。根据《经合组织测试准则 305》(TG305)中规定的标准取样计划,可能需要对暴露于低浓度和高浓度测试物以及阴性对照物的约 200 条鱼进行评估。我们报告了 64 种人类药物的实验辛醇/水分配系数对数值和生物浓缩系数值,用于评估当前生物浓缩系数值测试触发值辛醇/水分配系数对数值≥3,以及单一生物浓缩系数值暴露浓度是否允许对生物累积潜力进行准确分类。我们的数据支持将生物浓缩系数测试触发点提高到辛醇/水分配系数对数≥4,并使用单一测试浓度。由此减少鱼类的使用符合 3R 原则,不会对分类准确性产生不利影响。此外,还对归类为 B 级或 vB 级的三种药物进行了二次中毒潜在风险评估,未发现风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信