Relationship between cement penetration and incidence of a radiolucent line around the tibia 2 years after total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective study

IF 2.7 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"Relationship between cement penetration and incidence of a radiolucent line around the tibia 2 years after total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Cement penetration (CP) plays a key role in implant stability for cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and the radiolucent line (RLL) &gt;2 ​mm is a preliminary sign for loosening of components. However, the direct relationship between CP and the frequency of RLL &gt;2 ​mm is unclear, and the best cut-off value for CP to prevent RLL &gt;2 ​mm also remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate this relationship between CP and RLL and to determine the clinical cut-off value for tibial CP in patients 2 years after TKA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study investigated 157 knees from 123 patients with osteoarthritis who underwent cemented TKA. The CP and RLL immediately after TKA and the RLL 2 years after TKA were measured for the medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior tibial baseplate zones. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the best cut-off values for CP.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>RLL &gt;2 ​mm was not observed just after TKA. An RLL &gt;2 ​mm was observed in any tibial baseplate zone in 22 knees from 20 patients (RLL+ group) and was not observed in the remaining (RLL− group) 2 years after TKA. The mean CP for all zones was significantly higher in the RLL− group (2.5 ​± ​1.1 ​mm) than in the RLL+ group (1.7 ​± ​0.6 ​mm; <em>P</em> ​&lt; ​0.001). An RLL &gt;2 ​mm was seen in 21 knees in the medial zone, 9 knees in the lateral zone, 8 knees in the anterior zone, and 3 knees in the posterior zone. CP values with RLL &gt;2 ​mm were significantly lower than those without the RLL at the medial, anterior, and posterior tibial baseplate zones. The best cut-off values from the ROC curve of CP in each zone were between 1.1 ​mm and 2.1 ​mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The depth of the CP directly affects the incidence of an RLL &gt;2 ​mm. The best cut-off value for tibial CP to prevent an RLL &gt;2 ​mm is 2.1 ​mm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775424001020/pdfft?md5=671cba7defe8bd429226639c663662dd&pid=1-s2.0-S2059775424001020-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775424001020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Cement penetration (CP) plays a key role in implant stability for cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and the radiolucent line (RLL) >2 ​mm is a preliminary sign for loosening of components. However, the direct relationship between CP and the frequency of RLL >2 ​mm is unclear, and the best cut-off value for CP to prevent RLL >2 ​mm also remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate this relationship between CP and RLL and to determine the clinical cut-off value for tibial CP in patients 2 years after TKA.

Methods

This retrospective study investigated 157 knees from 123 patients with osteoarthritis who underwent cemented TKA. The CP and RLL immediately after TKA and the RLL 2 years after TKA were measured for the medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior tibial baseplate zones. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the best cut-off values for CP.

Results

RLL >2 ​mm was not observed just after TKA. An RLL >2 ​mm was observed in any tibial baseplate zone in 22 knees from 20 patients (RLL+ group) and was not observed in the remaining (RLL− group) 2 years after TKA. The mean CP for all zones was significantly higher in the RLL− group (2.5 ​± ​1.1 ​mm) than in the RLL+ group (1.7 ​± ​0.6 ​mm; P ​< ​0.001). An RLL >2 ​mm was seen in 21 knees in the medial zone, 9 knees in the lateral zone, 8 knees in the anterior zone, and 3 knees in the posterior zone. CP values with RLL >2 ​mm were significantly lower than those without the RLL at the medial, anterior, and posterior tibial baseplate zones. The best cut-off values from the ROC curve of CP in each zone were between 1.1 ​mm and 2.1 ​mm.

Conclusions

The depth of the CP directly affects the incidence of an RLL >2 ​mm. The best cut-off value for tibial CP to prevent an RLL >2 ​mm is 2.1 ​mm.

全膝关节置换术 2 年后骨水泥渗透与胫骨周围放射线发生率之间的关系:回顾性研究。
目的:骨水泥渗透(CP)对骨水泥全膝关节置换术(TKA)的植入物稳定性起着关键作用,而放射线(RLL)>2 毫米是组件松动的初步征兆。然而,CP 与 RLL >2 mm 频率之间的直接关系尚不清楚,防止 RLL >2 mm 的 CP 最佳临界值也仍不明确。本研究旨在探讨 CP 与 RLL 之间的关系,并确定 TKA 术后 2 年患者胫骨 CP 的临床临界值:这项回顾性研究调查了 123 名骨关节炎患者的 157 个膝关节,他们都接受了骨水泥 TKA。在 TKA 术后立即测量了 CP 和 RLL,在 TKA 术后 2 年测量了胫骨基底板内侧、外侧、前方和后方区域的 RLL。通过构建接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)来确定 CP 的最佳临界值:结果:TKA 术后未观察到 RLL >2 mm。在 20 名患者的 22 个膝关节中(RLL+ 组),任何胫骨基底板区都观察到 RLL >2 mm,其余患者(RLL- 组)在 TKA 术后 2 年未观察到 RLL >2 mm。RLL- 组所有区域的平均 CP 值(2.5 ± 1.1 mm)明显高于 RLL+ 组(1.7 ± 0.6 mm;21 个膝关节的内侧区域、9 个膝关节的外侧区域、8 个膝关节的前侧区域和 3 个膝关节的后侧区域出现了 P2 mm。在胫骨基底板内侧区、前区和后区,RLL >2 mm 的 CP 值明显低于无 RLL 的 CP 值。从 CP 的 ROC 曲线来看,每个区域的最佳临界值在 1.1 毫米和 2.1 毫米之间:结论:CP 深度直接影响 RLL >2 mm 的发生率。防止 RLL >2 mm 的胫骨 CP 最佳临界值为 2.1 mm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信