Analysis of the implementation of a circuit for intra-operative superposition and comparison of the surgical outcomes using ICBCT in maxillofacial surgery.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Núria Adell-Gómez, Adaia Valls-Ontañón, Albert Malet-Contreras, Andrés García-Piñeiro, Marta Gómez-Chiari, Arnau Valls-Esteve, Lucas Krauel, Josep Rubio-Palau
{"title":"Analysis of the implementation of a circuit for intra-operative superposition and comparison of the surgical outcomes using ICBCT in maxillofacial surgery.","authors":"Núria Adell-Gómez, Adaia Valls-Ontañón, Albert Malet-Contreras, Andrés García-Piñeiro, Marta Gómez-Chiari, Arnau Valls-Esteve, Lucas Krauel, Josep Rubio-Palau","doi":"10.1007/s11548-024-03196-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This paper describes a novel circuit for intraoperative analysis with ICBCT in maxillofacial surgery. The aim is to establish guidelines, define indications, and conduct an analysis of the implementation of the circuit for intraoperative comparison of surgical outcomes in relation to 3D virtual planning in maxillofacial surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 150 maxillofacial surgical procedures. Intraoperative actions involved fluoroscopy localization, intraoperative CBCT acquisition, segmentation, and superimposition, among other steps. Surgical times due to intraoperative superposition were measured, including time required for ICBCT positioning and acquisition, image segmentation, and comparison of 3D surfaces from the surgical planning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful intraoperative comparison was achieved in all 150 cases, enabling surgeons to detect and address modifications before concluding the surgery. Out of the total, 26 patients (17.33%) required intraoperative revisions, with 11 cases (7.33%) needing major surgical revisions. On average, the additional surgical time with this circuit implementation was 10.66 ± 3.03 min (n = 22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of our research demonstrate the potential for performing intraoperative surgical revision, allowing for immediate evaluation, enhancing surgical outcomes, and reducing the need for re-interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2463-2470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-024-03196-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This paper describes a novel circuit for intraoperative analysis with ICBCT in maxillofacial surgery. The aim is to establish guidelines, define indications, and conduct an analysis of the implementation of the circuit for intraoperative comparison of surgical outcomes in relation to 3D virtual planning in maxillofacial surgery.

Methods: The study included 150 maxillofacial surgical procedures. Intraoperative actions involved fluoroscopy localization, intraoperative CBCT acquisition, segmentation, and superimposition, among other steps. Surgical times due to intraoperative superposition were measured, including time required for ICBCT positioning and acquisition, image segmentation, and comparison of 3D surfaces from the surgical planning.

Results: Successful intraoperative comparison was achieved in all 150 cases, enabling surgeons to detect and address modifications before concluding the surgery. Out of the total, 26 patients (17.33%) required intraoperative revisions, with 11 cases (7.33%) needing major surgical revisions. On average, the additional surgical time with this circuit implementation was 10.66 ± 3.03 min (n = 22).

Conclusion: The results of our research demonstrate the potential for performing intraoperative surgical revision, allowing for immediate evaluation, enhancing surgical outcomes, and reducing the need for re-interventions.

Abstract Image

分析术中叠加电路的实施情况,比较颌面外科使用 ICBCT 的手术效果。
目的:本文介绍了在颌面外科手术中使用 ICBCT 进行术中分析的新型电路。目的是制定指导方针、确定适应症,并对电路的实施进行分析,以便术中比较与颌面外科三维虚拟规划相关的手术结果:研究包括 150 例颌面外科手术。术中操作包括透视定位、术中 CBCT 采集、分割和叠加等步骤。对术中叠加导致的手术时间进行了测量,包括 ICBCT 定位和采集、图像分割以及比较手术规划中的三维表面所需的时间:结果:所有 150 个病例都实现了成功的术中对比,使外科医生能够在手术结束前发现并解决修改问题。其中,26 名患者(17.33%)需要进行术中修改,11 名患者(7.33%)需要进行重大手术修改。平均而言,实施这种回路所需的额外手术时间为 10.66 ± 3.03 分钟(n = 22):我们的研究结果证明了进行术中手术翻修的潜力,可以立即进行评估,提高手术效果,减少再次干预的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for closing the gap between medical and technical disciplines, and encourages interdisciplinary research and development activities in an international environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信