Leveraging sensor-based functional outcomes to enhance understanding of the patient experience: challenges and opportunities.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Katelyn R Keyloun, Jessica Abel, Julia K Garcia, Elektra J Papadopoulos, Robyn T Carson, Chad Gwaltney, Ashley F Slagle, Bill Byrom
{"title":"Leveraging sensor-based functional outcomes to enhance understanding of the patient experience: challenges and opportunities.","authors":"Katelyn R Keyloun, Jessica Abel, Julia K Garcia, Elektra J Papadopoulos, Robyn T Carson, Chad Gwaltney, Ashley F Slagle, Bill Byrom","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2362291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sensor-based digital health technology (DHT) has emerged as a promising means to assess patient functioning within and outside clinical trials. Sensor-based functional outcomes (SBFOs) provide valuable insights that complement other measures of how a patient feels or functions to enhance understanding of the patient experience to inform medical product development.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This perspective paper provides recommendations for defining SBFOs, discusses the core evidence required to support SBFOs to inform decision-making, and considers future directions for the field.</p><p><strong>Expert commentary: </strong>The clinical outcome assessment (COA) development process provides an important starting point for developing patient-centered SBFOs; however, given the infancy of the field, SBFO development may benefit from a hybrid approach to evidence generation by merging exploratory data analysis with patient engagement in measure development. Effective SBFO development requires combining unique expertise in patient engagement, measurement and regulatory science, and digital health and analytics. Challenges specific to SBFO development include identifying concepts of interest, ensuring measurement of meaningful aspects of health, and identifying thresholds for meaningful change. SBFOs are complementary to other COAs and, as part of an integrated evidence strategy, offer great promise in fostering a holistic understanding of patient experience and treatment benefits, particularly in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2362291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sensor-based digital health technology (DHT) has emerged as a promising means to assess patient functioning within and outside clinical trials. Sensor-based functional outcomes (SBFOs) provide valuable insights that complement other measures of how a patient feels or functions to enhance understanding of the patient experience to inform medical product development.

Areas covered: This perspective paper provides recommendations for defining SBFOs, discusses the core evidence required to support SBFOs to inform decision-making, and considers future directions for the field.

Expert commentary: The clinical outcome assessment (COA) development process provides an important starting point for developing patient-centered SBFOs; however, given the infancy of the field, SBFO development may benefit from a hybrid approach to evidence generation by merging exploratory data analysis with patient engagement in measure development. Effective SBFO development requires combining unique expertise in patient engagement, measurement and regulatory science, and digital health and analytics. Challenges specific to SBFO development include identifying concepts of interest, ensuring measurement of meaningful aspects of health, and identifying thresholds for meaningful change. SBFOs are complementary to other COAs and, as part of an integrated evidence strategy, offer great promise in fostering a holistic understanding of patient experience and treatment benefits, particularly in real-world settings.

利用基于传感器的功能性结果加强对患者体验的了解:挑战与机遇。
简介:基于传感器的数字健康技术(DHT基于传感器的数字健康技术(DHT)已成为在临床试验内外评估患者功能的一种有前途的手段。基于传感器的功能结果(SBFOs)提供了有价值的见解,补充了其他衡量患者感觉或功能的方法,从而加深了对患者体验的了解,为医疗产品开发提供了依据:本视角论文提供了定义 SBFO 的建议,讨论了支持 SBFO 为决策提供依据所需的核心证据,并探讨了该领域的未来发展方向:临床结果评估(COA)的开发过程为开发以患者为中心的SBFO提供了一个重要的起点;然而,鉴于该领域尚处于起步阶段,SBFO的开发可能会受益于通过将探索性数据分析与患者参与措施开发相结合的混合证据生成方法。有效的 SBFO 开发需要结合患者参与、测量和监管科学以及数字健康和分析方面的独特专业知识。SBFO 开发所面临的具体挑战包括:确定感兴趣的概念、确保对健康有意义的方面进行测量,以及确定有意义变化的阈值。SBFO 与其他 COA 相辅相成,作为综合证据策略的一部分,在促进全面了解患者体验和治疗效果方面大有可为,尤其是在真实世界环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信