Relative permeability estimation using mercury injection capillary pressure measurements based on deep learning approaches

IF 2.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Ce Duan, Bo Kang, Rui Deng, Liang Zhang, Lian Wang, Bing Xu, Xing Zhao, Jianhua Qu
{"title":"Relative permeability estimation using mercury injection capillary pressure measurements based on deep learning approaches","authors":"Ce Duan, Bo Kang, Rui Deng, Liang Zhang, Lian Wang, Bing Xu, Xing Zhao, Jianhua Qu","doi":"10.1007/s13202-024-01826-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Relative permeability (RP) curves which provide fundamental insights into porous media flow behavior serve as critical parameters in reservoir engineering and numerical simulation studies. However, obtaining accurate RP curves remains a challenge due to expensive experimental costs, core contamination, measurement errors, and other factors. To address this issue, an innovative approach using deep learning strategy is proposed for the prediction of rock sample RP curves directly from mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) measurements which include the mercury injection curve, mercury withdrawal curve, and pore size distribution. To capture the distinct characteristics of different rock samples' MICP curves effectively, the Gramian Angular Field (GAF) based graph transformation method is introduced for mapping the curves into richly informative image forms. Subsequently, these 2D images are combined into three-channel red, green, blue (RGB) images and fed into a Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory (ConvLSTM) model within our established self-supervised learning framework. Simultaneously the dependencies and evolutionary sequences among image samples are captured through the limited MICP-RP samples and self-supervised learning framework. After that, a highly generalized RP curve calculation proxy framework based on deep learning called RPCDL is constructed by the autonomously generated nearly infinite training samples. The remarkable performance of the proposed method is verified with the experimental data from rock samples in the X oilfield. When applied to 37 small-sample data spaces for the prediction of 10 test samples, the average relative error is 3.6%, which demonstrates the effectiveness of our approach in mapping MICP experimental results to corresponding RP curves. Moreover, the comparison study against traditional CNN and LSTM illustrated the great performance of the RPCDL method in the prediction of both <i>S</i><sub><i>o</i></sub> and <i>S</i><sub><i>w</i></sub> lines in oil–water RP curves. To this end, this method offers an intelligent and robust means for efficiently estimating RP curves in various reservoir engineering scenarios without costly experiments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-024-01826-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relative permeability (RP) curves which provide fundamental insights into porous media flow behavior serve as critical parameters in reservoir engineering and numerical simulation studies. However, obtaining accurate RP curves remains a challenge due to expensive experimental costs, core contamination, measurement errors, and other factors. To address this issue, an innovative approach using deep learning strategy is proposed for the prediction of rock sample RP curves directly from mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) measurements which include the mercury injection curve, mercury withdrawal curve, and pore size distribution. To capture the distinct characteristics of different rock samples' MICP curves effectively, the Gramian Angular Field (GAF) based graph transformation method is introduced for mapping the curves into richly informative image forms. Subsequently, these 2D images are combined into three-channel red, green, blue (RGB) images and fed into a Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory (ConvLSTM) model within our established self-supervised learning framework. Simultaneously the dependencies and evolutionary sequences among image samples are captured through the limited MICP-RP samples and self-supervised learning framework. After that, a highly generalized RP curve calculation proxy framework based on deep learning called RPCDL is constructed by the autonomously generated nearly infinite training samples. The remarkable performance of the proposed method is verified with the experimental data from rock samples in the X oilfield. When applied to 37 small-sample data spaces for the prediction of 10 test samples, the average relative error is 3.6%, which demonstrates the effectiveness of our approach in mapping MICP experimental results to corresponding RP curves. Moreover, the comparison study against traditional CNN and LSTM illustrated the great performance of the RPCDL method in the prediction of both So and Sw lines in oil–water RP curves. To this end, this method offers an intelligent and robust means for efficiently estimating RP curves in various reservoir engineering scenarios without costly experiments.

Abstract Image

基于深度学习方法,利用汞注入毛细管压力测量估算相对渗透率
相对渗透率(RP)曲线是储层工程和数值模拟研究中的关键参数,它提供了对多孔介质流动行为的基本见解。然而,由于昂贵的实验成本、岩心污染、测量误差等因素,获取准确的相对渗透率曲线仍是一项挑战。为解决这一问题,本文提出了一种采用深度学习策略的创新方法,可直接从汞注入毛细管压力(MICP)测量结果(包括汞注入曲线、汞退出曲线和孔径分布)预测岩石样本的 RP 曲线。为了有效捕捉不同岩石样本 MICP 曲线的显著特征,引入了基于格拉米安角场(GAF)的图转换方法,将曲线映射为信息丰富的图像形式。随后,这些二维图像被组合成红、绿、蓝(RGB)三通道图像,并在我们已建立的自监督学习框架内输入卷积长短期记忆(ConvLSTM)模型。同时,通过有限的 MICP-RP 样本和自我监督学习框架捕捉图像样本之间的依赖关系和演化序列。然后,通过自主生成的近乎无限的训练样本,构建了一个基于深度学习的高度通用化的 RP 曲线计算代理框架,称为 RPCDL。所提方法的卓越性能通过 X 油田岩石样本的实验数据得到了验证。当应用于 37 个小样本数据空间对 10 个测试样本进行预测时,平均相对误差为 3.6%,这表明我们的方法能有效地将 MICP 实验结果映射到相应的 RP 曲线。此外,与传统 CNN 和 LSTM 的对比研究表明,RPCDL 方法在预测油水 RP 曲线中的 So 线和 Sw 线时表现出色。因此,该方法提供了一种智能、稳健的方法,无需昂贵的实验就能在各种油藏工程场景中有效估计 RP 曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is an international open access journal that publishes original and review articles as well as book reviews on leading edge studies in the field of petroleum engineering, petroleum geology and exploration geophysics and the implementation of related technologies to the development and management of oil and gas reservoirs from their discovery through their entire production cycle. Focusing on: Reservoir characterization and modeling Unconventional oil and gas reservoirs Geophysics: Acquisition and near surface Geophysics Modeling and Imaging Geophysics: Interpretation Geophysics: Processing Production Engineering Formation Evaluation Reservoir Management Petroleum Geology Enhanced Recovery Geomechanics Drilling Completions The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct. Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice as detailed here: https://www.springer.com/us/editorial-policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信