The Acoustic Index User's Guide: A practical manual for defining, generating and understanding current and future acoustic indices

IF 6.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Tom Bradfer‐Lawrence, Brad Duthie, Carlos Abrahams, Matyáš Adam, Ross J. Barnett, Amy Beeston, Jennifer Darby, Benedict Dell, Nick Gardner, Amandine Gasc, Becky Heath, Nia Howells, Magnus Janson, Maria‐Viktoria Kyoseva, Thomas Luypaert, Oliver C. Metcalf, Anna E. Nousek‐McGregor, Frederica Poznansky, Samuel R. P.‐J. Ross, Sarab Sethi, Siobhan Smyth, Emily Waddell, Jérémy S. P. Froidevaux
{"title":"The Acoustic Index User's Guide: A practical manual for defining, generating and understanding current and future acoustic indices","authors":"Tom Bradfer‐Lawrence, Brad Duthie, Carlos Abrahams, Matyáš Adam, Ross J. Barnett, Amy Beeston, Jennifer Darby, Benedict Dell, Nick Gardner, Amandine Gasc, Becky Heath, Nia Howells, Magnus Janson, Maria‐Viktoria Kyoseva, Thomas Luypaert, Oliver C. Metcalf, Anna E. Nousek‐McGregor, Frederica Poznansky, Samuel R. P.‐J. Ross, Sarab Sethi, Siobhan Smyth, Emily Waddell, Jérémy S. P. Froidevaux","doi":"10.1111/2041-210x.14357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>Ecoacoustics, the study of environmental sound, is a rapidly growing discipline offering ecological insights at scales ranging from individual organisms to whole ecosystems. Substantial methodological developments over the last 15 years have streamlined extraction of ecological information from audio recordings. One widely used set of methods are acoustic indices, which offer numerical summaries of the spectral, temporal and amplitude patterns in audio recordings.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Currently, the specifics of each index's background, methodology and the soundscape patterns they are designed to summarise, are spread across multiple sources. Critically, details of index calculation are sometimes scarce, making it challenging for users to understand how index values are generated. Discrepancies in understanding can lead to misuse of acoustic indices or reporting of spurious results. This hinders ecological inference, replicability and discourages adoption of these tools for conservation and ecosystem monitoring, where they might otherwise provide useful insight.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Here we present the Acoustic Index User's Guide—an interactive RShiny web app that defines and deconstructs eight of the most commonly used acoustic indices to facilitate consistent application across the discipline. We break the acoustic indices calculations down into easy‐to‐follow steps to better enable practical application and critical interpretation of acoustic indices. We demonstrate typical soundscape patterns using a suite of 91 example audio recordings: 66 real‐world soundscapes from terrestrial, aquatic and subterranean systems around the world, and 25 synthetic files demonstrating archetypal soundscape patterns. Our interpretation figures signpost specific soundscape patterns likely to be reflected in acoustic indices' values.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>This RShiny app is a living resource; additional acoustic indices will be added in the future through collaboration with authors of pre‐existing and new indices. The app also serves as a best‐practice template for the information required when publishing new acoustic indices, so that authors can facilitate the widest possible understanding and uptake of their indices. In turn, improved understanding of acoustic indices will aid effective hypothesis generation, application and interpretation in ecological research, ecosystem monitoring and conservation management.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":208,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecoacoustics, the study of environmental sound, is a rapidly growing discipline offering ecological insights at scales ranging from individual organisms to whole ecosystems. Substantial methodological developments over the last 15 years have streamlined extraction of ecological information from audio recordings. One widely used set of methods are acoustic indices, which offer numerical summaries of the spectral, temporal and amplitude patterns in audio recordings. Currently, the specifics of each index's background, methodology and the soundscape patterns they are designed to summarise, are spread across multiple sources. Critically, details of index calculation are sometimes scarce, making it challenging for users to understand how index values are generated. Discrepancies in understanding can lead to misuse of acoustic indices or reporting of spurious results. This hinders ecological inference, replicability and discourages adoption of these tools for conservation and ecosystem monitoring, where they might otherwise provide useful insight. Here we present the Acoustic Index User's Guide—an interactive RShiny web app that defines and deconstructs eight of the most commonly used acoustic indices to facilitate consistent application across the discipline. We break the acoustic indices calculations down into easy‐to‐follow steps to better enable practical application and critical interpretation of acoustic indices. We demonstrate typical soundscape patterns using a suite of 91 example audio recordings: 66 real‐world soundscapes from terrestrial, aquatic and subterranean systems around the world, and 25 synthetic files demonstrating archetypal soundscape patterns. Our interpretation figures signpost specific soundscape patterns likely to be reflected in acoustic indices' values. This RShiny app is a living resource; additional acoustic indices will be added in the future through collaboration with authors of pre‐existing and new indices. The app also serves as a best‐practice template for the information required when publishing new acoustic indices, so that authors can facilitate the widest possible understanding and uptake of their indices. In turn, improved understanding of acoustic indices will aid effective hypothesis generation, application and interpretation in ecological research, ecosystem monitoring and conservation management.
声学指数用户指南》:定义、生成和理解当前及未来声学指数的实用手册
生态声学(Ecoacoustics)是一门研究环境声音的学科,是一门迅速发展的学科,它提供了从单个生物到整个生态系统的生态洞察力。在过去的 15 年中,方法论取得了长足的发展,简化了从录音中提取生态信息的过程。其中一套广泛使用的方法是声学指数,它对音频记录中的频谱、时间和振幅模式进行数字总结。目前,每种指数的具体背景、方法和旨在概括的声景模式都有多种来源。重要的是,指数计算的细节有时很少,使用户难以理解指数值是如何产生的。理解上的差异可能会导致声学指数的误用或虚假结果的报告。这妨碍了生态推断和可复制性,并阻碍了这些工具在保护和生态系统监测方面的应用,而这些工具本来是可以提供有用的见解的。在此,我们介绍《声学指数用户指南》--一个交互式的 RShiny 网络应用程序,它定义并解构了八个最常用的声学指数,以促进整个学科的一致应用。我们将声学指数的计算分解为简单易懂的步骤,以便更好地实际应用和批判性地解释声学指数。我们使用一套 91 个示例录音来演示典型的声景模式:其中包括 66 个来自世界各地陆地、水生和地下系统的真实声景,以及 25 个展示典型声景模式的合成文件。我们的解释数字指出了可能反映在声学指数值中的特定声景模式。这个 RShiny 应用程序是一个有生命力的资源;通过与已有指数和新指数的作者合作,未来将增加更多的声学指数。该应用程序还可作为发布新声学指数时所需信息的最佳实践模板,以便作者尽可能广泛地了解和采用其指数。反过来,提高对声学指数的理解将有助于生态研究、生态系统监测和保护管理中有效的假设生成、应用和解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: A British Ecological Society journal, Methods in Ecology and Evolution (MEE) promotes the development of new methods in ecology and evolution, and facilitates their dissemination and uptake by the research community. MEE brings together papers from previously disparate sub-disciplines to provide a single forum for tracking methodological developments in all areas. MEE publishes methodological papers in any area of ecology and evolution, including: -Phylogenetic analysis -Statistical methods -Conservation & management -Theoretical methods -Practical methods, including lab and field -This list is not exhaustive, and we welcome enquiries about possible submissions. Methods are defined in the widest terms and may be analytical, practical or conceptual. A primary aim of the journal is to maximise the uptake of techniques by the community. We recognise that a major stumbling block in the uptake and application of new methods is the accessibility of methods. For example, users may need computer code, example applications or demonstrations of methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信