Analytical and Clinical Validation of AIM-NASH: A Digital Pathology Tool for Artificial Intelligence-based Measurement of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Histology

Hanna Pulaski, Stephen A. Harrison, Shraddha S. Mehta, Arun J Sanyal, Marlena C. Vitali, Laryssa C. Manigat, Hypatia Hou, Susan P. Madasu Christudoss, Sara M. Hoffman, Adam Stanford-Moore, Robert Egger, Jonathan Glickman, Murray Resnick, Neel Patel, Cristin E. Taylor, Robert P. Myers, Chuhan Chung, Scott D. Patterson, Anne-Sophie Sejling, Anne Minnich, Vipul Baxi, G. Mani Subramaniam, Quentin M. Anstee, Rohit Loomba, Vlad Ratziu, Michael C Montalto, Andrew H Beck, Katy Wack
{"title":"Analytical and Clinical Validation of AIM-NASH: A Digital Pathology Tool for Artificial Intelligence-based Measurement of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Histology","authors":"Hanna Pulaski, Stephen A. Harrison, Shraddha S. Mehta, Arun J Sanyal, Marlena C. Vitali, Laryssa C. Manigat, Hypatia Hou, Susan P. Madasu Christudoss, Sara M. Hoffman, Adam Stanford-Moore, Robert Egger, Jonathan Glickman, Murray Resnick, Neel Patel, Cristin E. Taylor, Robert P. Myers, Chuhan Chung, Scott D. Patterson, Anne-Sophie Sejling, Anne Minnich, Vipul Baxi, G. Mani Subramaniam, Quentin M. Anstee, Rohit Loomba, Vlad Ratziu, Michael C Montalto, Andrew H Beck, Katy Wack","doi":"10.1101/2024.05.29.24308109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metabolic-dysfunction associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality, yet treatment options are limited. Manual scoring of liver biopsies, currently the gold standard for clinical trial enrollment and endpoint assessment, suffers from high reader variability. This study represents the most comprehensive multi-site analytical and clinical validation of an AI-based pathology system, Artificial Intelligence-based Measurement of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (AIM-NASH), to assist pathologists in MASH trial histology scoring. AIM-NASH demonstrated high repeatability and reproducibility compared to manual scoring. AIM-NASH-assisted reads by expert MASH pathologists were superior to unassisted reads in accurately assessing inflammation, ballooning, NAS >= 4 with >=1 in each score category, and MASH resolution, while maintaining non-inferiority in steatosis and fibrosis assessment. These findings suggest AIM-NASH could mitigate reader variability, providing a more reliable assessment of therapeutics in MASH clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":501528,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Pathology","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.29.24308109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metabolic-dysfunction associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality, yet treatment options are limited. Manual scoring of liver biopsies, currently the gold standard for clinical trial enrollment and endpoint assessment, suffers from high reader variability. This study represents the most comprehensive multi-site analytical and clinical validation of an AI-based pathology system, Artificial Intelligence-based Measurement of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (AIM-NASH), to assist pathologists in MASH trial histology scoring. AIM-NASH demonstrated high repeatability and reproducibility compared to manual scoring. AIM-NASH-assisted reads by expert MASH pathologists were superior to unassisted reads in accurately assessing inflammation, ballooning, NAS >= 4 with >=1 in each score category, and MASH resolution, while maintaining non-inferiority in steatosis and fibrosis assessment. These findings suggest AIM-NASH could mitigate reader variability, providing a more reliable assessment of therapeutics in MASH clinical trials.
AIM-NASH 的分析和临床验证:基于人工智能测量非酒精性脂肪性肝炎组织学的数字病理学工具
代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝炎(MASH)是导致肝脏相关疾病发病率和死亡率的主要原因,但治疗方案却很有限。肝脏活检的人工评分是目前临床试验入组和终点评估的黄金标准,但其读者变异性很高。本研究是对基于人工智能的病理系统--非酒精性脂肪性肝炎的人工智能测量(AIM-NASH)--进行的最全面的多点分析和临床验证,以协助病理学家进行 MASH 试验组织学评分。与人工评分相比,AIM-NASH 具有很高的重复性和再现性。在准确评估炎症、气胀、NAS >=4与每个评分类别中的>=1以及MASH分辨率方面,由MASH病理专家进行的AIM-NASH辅助读数优于无辅助读数,同时在脂肪变性和纤维化评估方面保持非劣势。这些研究结果表明,AIM-NASH 可以减少阅读器的变异性,为 MASH 临床试验提供更可靠的治疗评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信