Songbird annual productivity declines with increasing soil lead contamination around nests

Frank R Thompson III, Thomas W Bonnot, Rebecka L Brasso, Melissa C Roach, Kathy Hixson, David E Mosby
{"title":"Songbird annual productivity declines with increasing soil lead contamination around nests","authors":"Frank R Thompson III, Thomas W Bonnot, Rebecka L Brasso, Melissa C Roach, Kathy Hixson, David E Mosby","doi":"10.1093/ornithapp/duae021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Songbirds incidentally ingest soil contaminated with lead and several species in the Southeast Missouri Lead Mining District have a negative relationship between soil lead concentration and reproduction. We used an individual-based model (IBM) to simulate nesting processes throughout the breeding season to estimate annual productivity for five songbirds in relation to soil-lead concentration. We modeled daily nest survival and number fledged in relation to soil lead and incorporated these relationships into the IBM using a Bayesian approach that fully captured parameter uncertainty and process variation. The proportion of the posterior distribution for the effect of soil lead on daily nest survival was mostly negative for Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Eastern Towhee), Passerina cyanea (Indigo Bunting), Cardinalis cardinalis (Northern Cardinal), and Sialia sialis (Eastern Bluebird; f = 0.972, 0.990, 0.741, 0.581, respectively) and slightly positive for Spizella pusilla (Field Sparrow; f = 0.680). The proportion of the posterior distribution for the effect of soil lead on the number fledged from successful nests was mostly negative for S. pusilla, P. erythrophthalmus, and C. cardinalis (f = 0.867, 0.585, 0.508, respectively) and positive for P. cyanea and S. sialis (f = 0.773, 0.744). Simulated annual productivity decreased by 0.04–1.47 young/female/year among species across the range of soil lead concentrations, with the greatest declines for P. erythrophthalmus and P. cyanea. The probability of fledging one or more young changed from 51% to 15% for P. erythrophthalmus, 57% to 23% for P. cyanea, 60% to 48% for C. cardinalis, 94% to 84% for S. sialis, and 57% to 64% for S. pusilla as soil-lead concentration around a nest increased from 20 to 4000 ppm. Most nest failures were the result of predation; therefore, we suggest lead may have affected birds’ behavior at the nest, or affected nest site quality, which resulted in higher nest predation.","PeriodicalId":501493,"journal":{"name":"The Condor: Ornithological Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Condor: Ornithological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duae021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Songbirds incidentally ingest soil contaminated with lead and several species in the Southeast Missouri Lead Mining District have a negative relationship between soil lead concentration and reproduction. We used an individual-based model (IBM) to simulate nesting processes throughout the breeding season to estimate annual productivity for five songbirds in relation to soil-lead concentration. We modeled daily nest survival and number fledged in relation to soil lead and incorporated these relationships into the IBM using a Bayesian approach that fully captured parameter uncertainty and process variation. The proportion of the posterior distribution for the effect of soil lead on daily nest survival was mostly negative for Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Eastern Towhee), Passerina cyanea (Indigo Bunting), Cardinalis cardinalis (Northern Cardinal), and Sialia sialis (Eastern Bluebird; f = 0.972, 0.990, 0.741, 0.581, respectively) and slightly positive for Spizella pusilla (Field Sparrow; f = 0.680). The proportion of the posterior distribution for the effect of soil lead on the number fledged from successful nests was mostly negative for S. pusilla, P. erythrophthalmus, and C. cardinalis (f = 0.867, 0.585, 0.508, respectively) and positive for P. cyanea and S. sialis (f = 0.773, 0.744). Simulated annual productivity decreased by 0.04–1.47 young/female/year among species across the range of soil lead concentrations, with the greatest declines for P. erythrophthalmus and P. cyanea. The probability of fledging one or more young changed from 51% to 15% for P. erythrophthalmus, 57% to 23% for P. cyanea, 60% to 48% for C. cardinalis, 94% to 84% for S. sialis, and 57% to 64% for S. pusilla as soil-lead concentration around a nest increased from 20 to 4000 ppm. Most nest failures were the result of predation; therefore, we suggest lead may have affected birds’ behavior at the nest, or affected nest site quality, which resulted in higher nest predation.
鸣禽的年生产力随着巢穴周围土壤铅污染的增加而下降
鸣禽会偶然摄入受铅污染的土壤,密苏里州东南部铅矿区的一些物种的土壤铅浓度与繁殖之间存在负相关关系。我们使用基于个体的模型(IBM)来模拟整个繁殖季节的筑巢过程,以估计五种鸣禽的年生产力与土壤铅浓度的关系。我们建立了与土壤铅相关的每日巢存活率和羽数模型,并采用贝叶斯方法将这些关系纳入 IBM,以充分捕捉参数的不确定性和过程的变化。土壤铅对每日筑巢存活率的影响的后验分布比例对 Pipilo erythrophthalmus(东方黄雀)、Passerina cyanea(靛蓝鹀)、Cardinalis cardinalis(北方红雀)和 Sialia sialis(东方蓝鸟;f = 0.972,0.990,0.741,0.581,分别为负)和 Spizella pusilla(田麻雀;f = 0.680)而言大多为负,而对 Spizella pusilla(田麻雀;f = 0.680)而言略微为正。土壤铅对成功筑巢羽数的影响的后验分布比例对 S. pusilla、P. erythrophthalmus 和 C. cardinalis 大多为负(f = 0.867、0.585、0.508),对 P. cyanea 和 S. sialis 为正(f = 0.773、0.744)。在不同的土壤铅浓度范围内,不同物种的模拟年生产力下降了 0.04-1.47 个幼鸟/雌鸟/年,其中红腹滨鹬和红腹滨鹬的下降幅度最大。当巢穴周围土壤铅浓度从 20 ppm 增加到 4000 ppm 时,红眼琵鹭羽化一只或多只幼鸟的概率从 51% 降至 15%,红眼琵鹭从 57% 降至 23%,C. cardinalis 从 60% 降至 48%,S. sialis 从 94% 降至 84%,S. pusilla 从 57% 降至 64%。大多数巢的失败都是捕食的结果;因此,我们认为铅可能影响了鸟类在巢中的行为,或影响了巢址的质量,从而导致更高的巢捕食率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信