Location optimization of emergency medical services: Considering joint service coverage of ambulances and emergency centers

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Weicong Luo, Jing Yao, Richard Mitchell, Xiaoxiang Zhang, Wenqiang Li
{"title":"Location optimization of emergency medical services: Considering joint service coverage of ambulances and emergency centers","authors":"Weicong Luo, Jing Yao, Richard Mitchell, Xiaoxiang Zhang, Wenqiang Li","doi":"10.1177/23998083241253108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emergency Medical Services (EMS) play an essential role in saving lives and improving health outcomes by offering immediate medical care to individuals who experience sudden illnesses or injuries. A complete EMS journey consists of two related trips: one from an EMS station to a scene (Trip 1), and the other from a scene to a definitive care location (Trip 2), where the service is coordinately provided by two types of facilities: EMS stations/ambulances and emergency centers (e.g., trauma centers or stroke centers) that are often affiliated with general hospitals. Current work on EMS location optimization considers only one trip (Trip 1 or Trip 2) which ignores the coordination between EMS stations and emergency centers, or the overall trip alone that overlooks the response time requirement. This paper proposed a spatial optimization model, the maximal coverage location problem based on joint coverage (MCLP-JC), for siting EMS stations and emergency centers simultaneously with a consideration of the two related trips. An empirical study of stroke center planning in Wuhan, China, is implemented to compare the proposed approach with the maximal coverage location problem based on overall coverage (MCLP-OC). The results demonstrate that the MCLP-JC can ensure more people being able to receive the first care from an ambulance within the response time requirement, which is critical to subsequent treatment at emergency centers and the odds of survival. The findings from the two scenarios regarding service relocation and expansion offer insights for future health facility planning.","PeriodicalId":11863,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241253108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) play an essential role in saving lives and improving health outcomes by offering immediate medical care to individuals who experience sudden illnesses or injuries. A complete EMS journey consists of two related trips: one from an EMS station to a scene (Trip 1), and the other from a scene to a definitive care location (Trip 2), where the service is coordinately provided by two types of facilities: EMS stations/ambulances and emergency centers (e.g., trauma centers or stroke centers) that are often affiliated with general hospitals. Current work on EMS location optimization considers only one trip (Trip 1 or Trip 2) which ignores the coordination between EMS stations and emergency centers, or the overall trip alone that overlooks the response time requirement. This paper proposed a spatial optimization model, the maximal coverage location problem based on joint coverage (MCLP-JC), for siting EMS stations and emergency centers simultaneously with a consideration of the two related trips. An empirical study of stroke center planning in Wuhan, China, is implemented to compare the proposed approach with the maximal coverage location problem based on overall coverage (MCLP-OC). The results demonstrate that the MCLP-JC can ensure more people being able to receive the first care from an ambulance within the response time requirement, which is critical to subsequent treatment at emergency centers and the odds of survival. The findings from the two scenarios regarding service relocation and expansion offer insights for future health facility planning.
优化紧急医疗服务的位置:考虑救护车和急救中心的联合服务覆盖范围
紧急医疗服务(EMS)通过为突发疾病或受伤者提供即时医疗服务,在挽救生命和改善健康状况方面发挥着重要作用。一次完整的紧急医疗服务旅程包括两次相关的行程:一次是从紧急医疗服务站到现场(行程 1),另一次是从现场到最终护理地点(行程 2),其中由两类设施协调提供服务:急救站/救护车和急救中心(如创伤中心或中风中心)通常隶属于综合医院。目前有关急救中心位置优化的研究只考虑了一个行程(行程 1 或行程 2),忽略了急救站和急救中心之间的协调,或者只考虑了整个行程,忽略了响应时间要求。本文提出了一个空间优化模型,即基于联合覆盖的最大覆盖选址问题(MCLP-JC),用于同时考虑两个相关行程的急救站和急救中心的选址。通过对中国武汉市脑卒中中心规划的实证研究,将所提出的方法与基于整体覆盖的最大覆盖选址问题(MCLP-OC)进行了比较。结果表明,MCLP-JC 能确保更多的人在响应时间要求内得到救护车的第一时间救治,这对急救中心的后续治疗和生存几率至关重要。有关服务迁移和扩展的两种方案的研究结果为未来的医疗设施规划提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.40%
发文量
159
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信