Comparative study of linear and nonlinear calibration algorithm for extrapolation ability of near infrared spectroscopy quantitative analysis

IF 2.7 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Xue-Song Huo, Pu Chen, Jing-Yan Li, Yu-Peng Xu, Dan Liu, Xiao-Li Chu
{"title":"Comparative study of linear and nonlinear calibration algorithm for extrapolation ability of near infrared spectroscopy quantitative analysis","authors":"Xue-Song Huo,&nbsp;Pu Chen,&nbsp;Jing-Yan Li,&nbsp;Yu-Peng Xu,&nbsp;Dan Liu,&nbsp;Xiao-Li Chu","doi":"10.1016/j.vibspec.2024.103693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The determination of the o-nitrotoluene (o-MNT) content in separation process of mononitrotoluene (MNT) is of interest, since it affects the purity of m-nitrotoluene (m-MNT) and p-nitrotoluene (p-MNT). In real-world applications, the calibration model inevitably requires dealing with complex extrapolation problems. Therefore, this study extracted the spectral features of the o-nitrotoluene based on the interval selection algorithm. The linear calibration method (partial least squares (PLS)) and nonlinear calibration methods (support vector machine (SVM), back propagation (BP), random forest (RF), extreme learning machine (ELM)) were used to build the calibration models based on o-nitrotoluene samples in different concentration ranges, and the prediction accuracy and robustness of the calibration model were compared. The results indicate that the effectiveness of different calibration methods is different when going from prediction accuracy to robustness. The prediction accuracy and robustness of RF models are not satisfactory. BP models, which are capable of producing very accurate results in terms of prediction accuracy, are not able to solve extrapolation problems. PLS model has more advantages in model prediction accuracy. ELM has shown the best behavior in terms of robustness of model, but is inferior to PLS in terms of prediction accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23656,"journal":{"name":"Vibrational Spectroscopy","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 103693"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vibrational Spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924203124000468","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The determination of the o-nitrotoluene (o-MNT) content in separation process of mononitrotoluene (MNT) is of interest, since it affects the purity of m-nitrotoluene (m-MNT) and p-nitrotoluene (p-MNT). In real-world applications, the calibration model inevitably requires dealing with complex extrapolation problems. Therefore, this study extracted the spectral features of the o-nitrotoluene based on the interval selection algorithm. The linear calibration method (partial least squares (PLS)) and nonlinear calibration methods (support vector machine (SVM), back propagation (BP), random forest (RF), extreme learning machine (ELM)) were used to build the calibration models based on o-nitrotoluene samples in different concentration ranges, and the prediction accuracy and robustness of the calibration model were compared. The results indicate that the effectiveness of different calibration methods is different when going from prediction accuracy to robustness. The prediction accuracy and robustness of RF models are not satisfactory. BP models, which are capable of producing very accurate results in terms of prediction accuracy, are not able to solve extrapolation problems. PLS model has more advantages in model prediction accuracy. ELM has shown the best behavior in terms of robustness of model, but is inferior to PLS in terms of prediction accuracy.

线性和非线性校准算法对近红外光谱定量分析外推能力的比较研究
邻硝基甲苯(o-MNT)含量会影响间硝基甲苯(m-MNT)和对硝基甲苯(p-MNT)的纯度,因此在单硝基甲苯(MNT)的分离过程中确定邻硝基甲苯(o-MNT)的含量非常重要。在实际应用中,校准模型不可避免地需要处理复杂的外推法问题。因此,本研究根据区间选择算法提取了邻硝基甲苯的光谱特征。采用线性定标方法(偏最小二乘法(PLS))和非线性定标方法(支持向量机(SVM)、反向传播(BP)、随机森林(RF)、极端学习机(ELM))建立了基于不同浓度范围邻硝基甲苯样品的定标模型,并比较了定标模型的预测精度和鲁棒性。结果表明,从预测精度到稳健性,不同定标方法的效果是不同的。RF 模型的预测精度和稳健性都不理想。在预测精度方面,BP 模型能够得出非常准确的结果,但却无法解决外推问题。PLS 模型在模型预测精度方面更具优势。ELM 在模型稳健性方面表现最好,但在预测准确性方面不如 PLS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vibrational Spectroscopy
Vibrational Spectroscopy 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Vibrational Spectroscopy provides a vehicle for the publication of original research that focuses on vibrational spectroscopy. This covers infrared, near-infrared and Raman spectroscopies and publishes papers dealing with developments in applications, theory, techniques and instrumentation. The topics covered by the journal include: Sampling techniques, Vibrational spectroscopy coupled with separation techniques, Instrumentation (Fourier transform, conventional and laser based), Data manipulation, Spectra-structure correlation and group frequencies. The application areas covered include: Analytical chemistry, Bio-organic and bio-inorganic chemistry, Organic chemistry, Inorganic chemistry, Catalysis, Environmental science, Industrial chemistry, Materials science, Physical chemistry, Polymer science, Process control, Specialized problem solving.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信