Data-driven identification and comparison of full multivariable models for propofol–remifentanil induced general anesthesia

IF 3.3 2区 计算机科学 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Erhan Yumuk , Dana Copot , Clara M. Ionescu , Martine Neckebroek
{"title":"Data-driven identification and comparison of full multivariable models for propofol–remifentanil induced general anesthesia","authors":"Erhan Yumuk ,&nbsp;Dana Copot ,&nbsp;Clara M. Ionescu ,&nbsp;Martine Neckebroek","doi":"10.1016/j.jprocont.2024.103243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we present results with clinical data to enable a 2x2 input–output multivariable patient model for hypnosis and analgesia. Nonlinear multi-drug interaction models are identified from data recorded from 70 patients undergoing surgery during total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with several medical monitors for variables such as Bispectral Index, Nociception level (Medasense), skin conductance (Medstorm) and advanced spectral analysis conductance (AnspecPro). Bispectral index measures the depth of hypnosis (lack of consciousness), while nociception related indices from Medasense, Medstorm, and AnspecPro devices measure levels related to analgesia (lack of reaction to noxious stimuli). A comparison is given among three response surface model (RSM) structures – Minto, Greco, and Reduced Greco – for hypnotic and analgesic states during Propofol–Remifentanil interaction. The identified models capture the pharmacodynamic properties of dose–effect concentrations of Propofol/Remifentanil while the pharmacokinetic part of the patient model is calculated from patient’s biometric values using Schnider/Minto (SM), and Eleveld/Eleveld (EE) models. In presence of strict clinical protocols delivering data under poor identifiability conditions, we propose two methods of identification: (i) based on steady-state gains, and (ii) using all available data which includes part of the dynamic transient. The model parameters are optimized with Genetic Algorithm based on a goodness of fit performance measure complemented with root mean square error. The results suggest that the EE model combination is advantageous for Bispectral index pharmacokinetic modeling at the cost of numerical complexity, therefore reducing the uncertainty left to be identified in the pharmacodynamic part of the patient model. By contrast, the SM model combination is less computationally demanding and provides some improvement in the RSM accuracy for nociception level indicators. The comparison of three devices for nociception levels evaluation suggests that clinical data captured with the Medasense monitor provides best fitted RSMs with the Reduced Greco RSM structure, despite having fewer parameters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Process Control","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 103243"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959152424000830/pdfft?md5=1cff2716e512188dccfa1dc1ba2da1cb&pid=1-s2.0-S0959152424000830-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Process Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959152424000830","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we present results with clinical data to enable a 2x2 input–output multivariable patient model for hypnosis and analgesia. Nonlinear multi-drug interaction models are identified from data recorded from 70 patients undergoing surgery during total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with several medical monitors for variables such as Bispectral Index, Nociception level (Medasense), skin conductance (Medstorm) and advanced spectral analysis conductance (AnspecPro). Bispectral index measures the depth of hypnosis (lack of consciousness), while nociception related indices from Medasense, Medstorm, and AnspecPro devices measure levels related to analgesia (lack of reaction to noxious stimuli). A comparison is given among three response surface model (RSM) structures – Minto, Greco, and Reduced Greco – for hypnotic and analgesic states during Propofol–Remifentanil interaction. The identified models capture the pharmacodynamic properties of dose–effect concentrations of Propofol/Remifentanil while the pharmacokinetic part of the patient model is calculated from patient’s biometric values using Schnider/Minto (SM), and Eleveld/Eleveld (EE) models. In presence of strict clinical protocols delivering data under poor identifiability conditions, we propose two methods of identification: (i) based on steady-state gains, and (ii) using all available data which includes part of the dynamic transient. The model parameters are optimized with Genetic Algorithm based on a goodness of fit performance measure complemented with root mean square error. The results suggest that the EE model combination is advantageous for Bispectral index pharmacokinetic modeling at the cost of numerical complexity, therefore reducing the uncertainty left to be identified in the pharmacodynamic part of the patient model. By contrast, the SM model combination is less computationally demanding and provides some improvement in the RSM accuracy for nociception level indicators. The comparison of three devices for nociception levels evaluation suggests that clinical data captured with the Medasense monitor provides best fitted RSMs with the Reduced Greco RSM structure, despite having fewer parameters.

数据驱动的异丙酚-瑞芬太尼诱导全身麻醉全多变量模型的识别与比较
在本文中,我们介绍了利用临床数据建立 2x2 输入输出多变量患者催眠和镇痛模型的结果。非线性多药相互作用模型是从 70 名接受全静脉麻醉(TIVA)手术的患者记录的数据中确定的,这些数据包括双光谱指数、痛觉水平(Medasense)、皮肤电导率(Medstorm)和高级频谱分析电导率(AnspecPro)等变量的多个医疗监控器。双谱指数测量的是催眠深度(缺乏意识),而 Medasense、Medstorm 和 AnspecPro 设备中与痛觉相关的指数测量的是与镇痛相关的水平(对有害刺激缺乏反应)。针对丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼相互作用过程中的催眠和镇痛状态,比较了三种反应曲面模型(RSM)结构--明托、格雷科和还原格雷科。已确定的模型捕捉到了丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼剂量效应浓度的药效学特性,而患者模型的药代动力学部分则是通过施奈德/明托(SM)和埃勒维尔德/埃勒维尔德(EE)模型,根据患者的生物特征值计算得出的。在严格的临床协议下,数据的可识别性较差,因此我们提出了两种识别方法:(i) 基于稳态增益;(ii) 使用所有可用数据,包括部分动态瞬态数据。模型参数采用遗传算法进行优化,该算法基于拟合优度和均方根误差。结果表明,EE 模型组合在双谱指数药代动力学建模方面具有优势,但代价是数值复杂性,因此减少了患者模型药效学部分有待确定的不确定性。相比之下,SM 模型组合对计算的要求较低,并在一定程度上提高了痛觉水平指标的 RSM 精确度。对用于评估痛觉水平的三种设备进行的比较表明,尽管参数较少,但通过 Medasense 监护仪采集的临床数据提供了与 Reduced Greco RSM 结构最匹配的 RSM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Process Control
Journal of Process Control 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.90%
发文量
159
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: This international journal covers the application of control theory, operations research, computer science and engineering principles to the solution of process control problems. In addition to the traditional chemical processing and manufacturing applications, the scope of process control problems involves a wide range of applications that includes energy processes, nano-technology, systems biology, bio-medical engineering, pharmaceutical processing technology, energy storage and conversion, smart grid, and data analytics among others. Papers on the theory in these areas will also be accepted provided the theoretical contribution is aimed at the application and the development of process control techniques. Topics covered include: • Control applications• Process monitoring• Plant-wide control• Process control systems• Control techniques and algorithms• Process modelling and simulation• Design methods Advanced design methods exclude well established and widely studied traditional design techniques such as PID tuning and its many variants. Applications in fields such as control of automotive engines, machinery and robotics are not deemed suitable unless a clear motivation for the relevance to process control is provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信