Western Lake Erie Quagga Mussel growth estimates and evidence of barriers to local population growth

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ashley K. Elgin, Paul W. Glyshaw, Glenn S. Carter
{"title":"Western Lake Erie Quagga Mussel growth estimates and evidence of barriers to local population growth","authors":"Ashley K. Elgin, Paul W. Glyshaw, Glenn S. Carter","doi":"10.14321/aehm.026.04.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Invasive Quagga Mussels (Dreissena rostriformis bugensis) and Zebra Mussels (D. polymorpha) have been present in the Great Lakes for almost four decades and have caused substantial economic and environmental impacts. Factors that influence dreissenid mussel growth and population dynamics warrant more study, particularly for Quagga Mussels. We conducted a five-month field experiment in western Lake Erie to measure multiple growth metrics for Quagga Mussels at two sites with different conditions using mussels contained in cages on instrumented moorings. We also quantified dreissenid mussels that colonized into the cages and surveyed dreissenid mussels in the sediments at each site. By multiple measures of growth except for one, growth rates were similar between the two sites despite different chlorophyll a and turbidity levels as well as notable differences in the density and size distribution of mussels found in the sediments at these sites. The growth rates were approximately 0.03 mm d-1 for 12-mm Quagga Mussels and these rates declined with increasing initial shell length. Specific growth rate did not differ between shell and tissue measures or between sites, but both shell and tissue specific growth rates were much higher for smaller mussels. Site WE2, which is closer to Maumee River, had very few dreissenid mussels present in the sediments surrounding the mooring despite having a potential for growth comparable to that at WE4. The high level of colonization on the mooring at WE2 indicated that conditions at the sediment surface inhibit mussel settlement; adjacent benthic surveys indicated that very few mussels survive beyond the juvenile stage. Ultimately, the results from this study provide useful mussel growth parameters and indicate substrate or other limitations for dreissenid mussel populations in western Lake Erie.","PeriodicalId":8125,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management","volume":"138 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/aehm.026.04.120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Invasive Quagga Mussels (Dreissena rostriformis bugensis) and Zebra Mussels (D. polymorpha) have been present in the Great Lakes for almost four decades and have caused substantial economic and environmental impacts. Factors that influence dreissenid mussel growth and population dynamics warrant more study, particularly for Quagga Mussels. We conducted a five-month field experiment in western Lake Erie to measure multiple growth metrics for Quagga Mussels at two sites with different conditions using mussels contained in cages on instrumented moorings. We also quantified dreissenid mussels that colonized into the cages and surveyed dreissenid mussels in the sediments at each site. By multiple measures of growth except for one, growth rates were similar between the two sites despite different chlorophyll a and turbidity levels as well as notable differences in the density and size distribution of mussels found in the sediments at these sites. The growth rates were approximately 0.03 mm d-1 for 12-mm Quagga Mussels and these rates declined with increasing initial shell length. Specific growth rate did not differ between shell and tissue measures or between sites, but both shell and tissue specific growth rates were much higher for smaller mussels. Site WE2, which is closer to Maumee River, had very few dreissenid mussels present in the sediments surrounding the mooring despite having a potential for growth comparable to that at WE4. The high level of colonization on the mooring at WE2 indicated that conditions at the sediment surface inhibit mussel settlement; adjacent benthic surveys indicated that very few mussels survive beyond the juvenile stage. Ultimately, the results from this study provide useful mussel growth parameters and indicate substrate or other limitations for dreissenid mussel populations in western Lake Erie.
伊利湖西部夸加贻贝生长量估计值和当地种群增长障碍的证据
入侵的夸加贻贝(Dreissena rostriformis bugensis)和斑马贻贝(D. polymorpha)出现在五大湖中已有近四十年的时间,对经济和环境造成了巨大的影响。影响离散贻贝生长和种群动态的因素需要更多的研究,尤其是对夸加贻贝。我们在伊利湖西部进行了为期五个月的现场实验,在两个条件不同的地点,利用装在仪器系泊处笼子里的贻贝,测量夸加贻贝的多个生长指标。我们还量化了定殖到笼子中的裸贻贝,并调查了每个地点沉积物中的裸贻贝。通过对生长的多种测量(除一种外),尽管两个地点的叶绿素 a 和浊度水平不同,而且在这些地点的沉积物中发现的贻贝的密度和大小分布也有明显差异,但两个地点的生长率相似。12 毫米长的夸加贻贝的生长率约为 0.03 毫米/天,随着贝壳初始长度的增加,生长率有所下降。不同贝壳和组织的特定生长率没有差异,不同地点的特定生长率也没有差异,但较小的贻贝贝壳和组织的特定生长率要高得多。更靠近莫米河(Maumee River)的 WE2 遗址,尽管具有与 WE4 遗址相当的生长潜力,但停泊点周围的沉积物中却只有极少量的裸贻贝。WE2 停泊处的高定植水平表明,沉积物表面的条件抑制了贻贝的定居;邻近的底栖生物调查表明,只有极少数贻贝能存活到幼体阶段之后。最终,这项研究的结果提供了有用的贻贝生长参数,并表明伊利湖西部的裸裂贻贝种群受到底质或其他条件的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management
Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles on the following themes and topics: • Original articles focusing on ecosystem-based sciences, ecosystem health and management of marine and aquatic ecosystems • Reviews, invited perspectives and keynote contributions from conferences • Special issues on important emerging topics, themes, and ecosystems (climate change, invasive species, HABs, risk assessment, models)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信