A Future Agenda for Research on In-Service Theological Training in Thailand and Beyond

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Ross Winchester, Kevin Hovey, Johannes M. Luetz
{"title":"A Future Agenda for Research on In-Service Theological Training in Thailand and Beyond","authors":"Ross Winchester,&nbsp;Kevin Hovey,&nbsp;Johannes M. Luetz","doi":"10.1111/irom.12487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Contextualization has featured prominently in missiological research for decades, often alongside concepts such as syncretism and hybridity. Being typically conceived as attempts to transpose and communicate the gospel in words and ways that make sense to people in their local cultural settings, contextualization has been theorized extensively in missiological scholarship. Notwithstanding this longstanding scholarly interest, a dearth of research recognizes in-service training as a valid expression of contextualization praxis. This article addresses this knowledge gap. Set in the contemporary church context in Thailand, the article explores questions, issues, and trends of current theological training practice, considering future opportunities for indigenous leadership formation. The analysis converges around the central proposition that in-service training is an under-recognized strategy for leadership development in Thailand and beyond. Conceptualizing opportunities for future research, the review charts pertinent perspectives and prospects for in-service training. This article embodies a timely research agenda aimed at sidestepping undue reliance on Western-dominated hermeneutics while at the same time advocating for indigenous theological training approaches in countries of the majority world.</p>","PeriodicalId":54038,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Mission","volume":"113 1","pages":"92-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irom.12487","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Mission","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irom.12487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contextualization has featured prominently in missiological research for decades, often alongside concepts such as syncretism and hybridity. Being typically conceived as attempts to transpose and communicate the gospel in words and ways that make sense to people in their local cultural settings, contextualization has been theorized extensively in missiological scholarship. Notwithstanding this longstanding scholarly interest, a dearth of research recognizes in-service training as a valid expression of contextualization praxis. This article addresses this knowledge gap. Set in the contemporary church context in Thailand, the article explores questions, issues, and trends of current theological training practice, considering future opportunities for indigenous leadership formation. The analysis converges around the central proposition that in-service training is an under-recognized strategy for leadership development in Thailand and beyond. Conceptualizing opportunities for future research, the review charts pertinent perspectives and prospects for in-service training. This article embodies a timely research agenda aimed at sidestepping undue reliance on Western-dominated hermeneutics while at the same time advocating for indigenous theological training approaches in countries of the majority world.

Abstract Image

泰国及其他国家在职神学培训研究的未来议程
几十年来,"情境化 "在宣教研究中一直占据着重要地位,通常与 "融合 "和 "混杂 "等概念并列。情境化通常被认为是试图用对当地文化背景下的人们有意义的语言和方式来转述和传播福音,因此在宣教学术研究中被广泛地理论化。尽管学术界长期以来一直对此感兴趣,但将在职培训视为情境本土化实践的有效表现形式的研究却十分匮乏。本文针对这一知识空白进行了探讨。文章以泰国当代教会为背景,探讨了当前神学培训实践中的问题、议题和趋势,并考虑了本土领导力培养的未来机遇。分析围绕着一个中心命题展开,即在职培训是泰国及其他国家领导力发展中一个未得到充分认识的策略。通过对未来研究机会的构思,综述描绘了在职培训的相关视角和前景。本文体现了一个及时的研究议程,旨在避免过度依赖西方主导的诠释学,同时倡导在多数世界国家采用本土神学培训方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信