Trust me if you can: Practical challenges affecting the integration of carpooling in Mobility-as-a-Service platforms

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Francesca Cellina , Marco Derboni , Vincenzo Giuffrida , Uroš Tomic , Raphael Hoerler
{"title":"Trust me if you can: Practical challenges affecting the integration of carpooling in Mobility-as-a-Service platforms","authors":"Francesca Cellina ,&nbsp;Marco Derboni ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Giuffrida ,&nbsp;Uroš Tomic ,&nbsp;Raphael Hoerler","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>App-based Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) platforms combining public transport, car- and micro-mobility-shared services with real-time dynamic carpooling are emerging as viable alternatives to solo car use for sub-urban contexts. Insights from real-life implementation are however still limited. Which practical conditions may hinder the effectiveness of MaaS platforms leveraging carpooling? We tackle this question from the perspective of potential users of MixMyRide, a Swiss-based MaaS platform, based on co-design workshop sessions performed in Summer-Autumn 2022. We find four elements of practical interest, resonating with limitations already identified for carpooling. First, integrating carpooling in inter-modal trips increases the number of inter-changes potentially affected by delays. This requires real-time traffic information data, re-scheduling tools, and features for quick interaction between platform users. Second, features to create trust between strangers are needed, which require trade-offs between strict identity check and quick registration. Third, carpooling pick-up/drop-off may either endanger safety (if bus stops are used) or require inconvenient prior agreements, negatively affecting the MaaS platform’s dynamism. Fourth, carpooling offer is not granted. To accept possible discomfort in sharing personal space with strangers and time-effort to enter trip offers, drivers need specific incentives, such as sharing of travel expenses, reward vouchers by public institutions, or virtual gamification and feedback on saved emissions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24000954/pdfft?md5=fdddc6d63ec790b86ca779f4298bb5a8&pid=1-s2.0-S2214367X24000954-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24000954","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

App-based Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) platforms combining public transport, car- and micro-mobility-shared services with real-time dynamic carpooling are emerging as viable alternatives to solo car use for sub-urban contexts. Insights from real-life implementation are however still limited. Which practical conditions may hinder the effectiveness of MaaS platforms leveraging carpooling? We tackle this question from the perspective of potential users of MixMyRide, a Swiss-based MaaS platform, based on co-design workshop sessions performed in Summer-Autumn 2022. We find four elements of practical interest, resonating with limitations already identified for carpooling. First, integrating carpooling in inter-modal trips increases the number of inter-changes potentially affected by delays. This requires real-time traffic information data, re-scheduling tools, and features for quick interaction between platform users. Second, features to create trust between strangers are needed, which require trade-offs between strict identity check and quick registration. Third, carpooling pick-up/drop-off may either endanger safety (if bus stops are used) or require inconvenient prior agreements, negatively affecting the MaaS platform’s dynamism. Fourth, carpooling offer is not granted. To accept possible discomfort in sharing personal space with strangers and time-effort to enter trip offers, drivers need specific incentives, such as sharing of travel expenses, reward vouchers by public institutions, or virtual gamification and feedback on saved emissions.

如果可以,请相信我:影响将拼车纳入移动即服务平台的实际挑战
基于应用程序的移动即服务(MaaS)平台将公共交通、汽车和微型移动共享服务与实时动态拼车相结合,正在成为城市郊区单独使用汽车的可行替代方案。然而,从现实生活的实施中获得的启示仍然有限。哪些实际条件可能会阻碍利用拼车的 MaaS 平台的有效性?基于 2022 年夏季至秋季举行的共同设计研讨会,我们从瑞士 MaaS 平台 MixMyRide 潜在用户的角度出发,探讨了这一问题。我们发现了四个具有实际意义的要素,它们与拼车服务已经发现的局限性产生了共鸣。首先,将拼车整合到多式联运中会增加可能受延误影响的换乘站数量。这就需要实时交通信息数据、重新安排时间的工具以及平台用户之间快速互动的功能。其次,需要在陌生人之间建立信任的功能,这就需要在严格的身份检查和快速注册之间做出权衡。第三,拼车接送可能会危及安全(如果使用公共汽车站),或者需要不便的事先协议,从而对 MaaS 平台的活力产生负面影响。第四,拼车提议不是理所当然的。为了接受与陌生人共享个人空间可能带来的不适,以及费时费力地输入行程提议,驾驶员需要具体的激励措施,如分担旅行费用、公共机构提供奖励券,或虚拟游戏化和对节省的排放量进行反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信