Management of procalcitonin test overuse in an emergency department through a computer algorithm.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maria Salinas, Maite López-Garrigós, Ruth Torreblanca, Emilio Flores, Elena Diaz, Carlos Leiva-Salinas
{"title":"Management of procalcitonin test overuse in an emergency department through a computer algorithm.","authors":"Maria Salinas, Maite López-Garrigós, Ruth Torreblanca, Emilio Flores, Elena Diaz, Carlos Leiva-Salinas","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To show the procalcitonin (PCT) test demand from an emergency department (ED) over several years, to decrease PCT measurement via a computerized algorithm based on C-reactive protein (CRP) value, and to evaluate the subsequent economic savings.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed from January 1, 2018, to May 31, 2019, to evaluate an intervention to avoid PCT measurement in the ED of Hospital Universitario San Juan in Alicante in Spain, when CRP values are low.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PCT result of at least 1.5 ng/mL was agreed upon with ED providers in our study as the value for clinical decision-making, with values less than 1.5 ng/mL considered negative. We retrospectively reviewed all PCT and CRP values for ED patients and calculated the diagnostic indicators for PCT at 4 different CRP cutoffs using the PCT quantification as the gold standard. From July 1, 2019, to April 30, 2021, the agreed-upon strategy was implemented, and we counted the PCT tests avoided and calculated the savings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCT was not measured when CRP values were less than the selected CRP cutoff of 0.8 mg/dL, at which false-negative results were 1% and the 99th percentile of PCT was 1.5 ng/mL. In the postintervention period, 1091 PCT values were not measured and $11,553.69 was saved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An intervention to decrease PCT measurement in the ED designed by the clinical laboratory staff in consensus with requesting clinicians and based on CRP values decreased PCT testing and generated significant economic savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89554","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To show the procalcitonin (PCT) test demand from an emergency department (ED) over several years, to decrease PCT measurement via a computerized algorithm based on C-reactive protein (CRP) value, and to evaluate the subsequent economic savings.

Study design: A cross-sectional study was performed from January 1, 2018, to May 31, 2019, to evaluate an intervention to avoid PCT measurement in the ED of Hospital Universitario San Juan in Alicante in Spain, when CRP values are low.

Methods: A PCT result of at least 1.5 ng/mL was agreed upon with ED providers in our study as the value for clinical decision-making, with values less than 1.5 ng/mL considered negative. We retrospectively reviewed all PCT and CRP values for ED patients and calculated the diagnostic indicators for PCT at 4 different CRP cutoffs using the PCT quantification as the gold standard. From July 1, 2019, to April 30, 2021, the agreed-upon strategy was implemented, and we counted the PCT tests avoided and calculated the savings.

Results: PCT was not measured when CRP values were less than the selected CRP cutoff of 0.8 mg/dL, at which false-negative results were 1% and the 99th percentile of PCT was 1.5 ng/mL. In the postintervention period, 1091 PCT values were not measured and $11,553.69 was saved.

Conclusions: An intervention to decrease PCT measurement in the ED designed by the clinical laboratory staff in consensus with requesting clinicians and based on CRP values decreased PCT testing and generated significant economic savings.

通过计算机算法管理急诊科过度使用降钙素原检测。
目的显示几年来急诊科(ED)的降钙素原(PCT)检测需求,通过基于C反应蛋白(CRP)值的计算机化算法减少PCT测量,并评估随后的经济节约:2018年1月1日至2019年5月31日期间进行了一项横断面研究,评估西班牙阿利坎特圣胡安大学医院急诊室在CRP值较低时避免PCT测量的干预措施:在我们的研究中,急诊科医生同意将至少 1.5 纳克/毫升的 PCT 结果作为临床决策值,低于 1.5 纳克/毫升的结果视为阴性。我们回顾性地查看了急诊科患者的所有 PCT 和 CRP 值,并以 PCT 定量作为金标准,计算了 4 个不同 CRP 临界值下的 PCT 诊断指标。从 2019 年 7 月 1 日到 2021 年 4 月 30 日,我们实施了商定的策略,并计算了避免的 PCT 检验和节省的费用:结果:当 CRP 值小于选定的 CRP 临界值 0.8 毫克/分升(假阴性结果为 1%,PCT 的第 99 百分位数为 1.5 纳克/毫升)时,不进行 PCT 检测。干预后,1091 个 PCT 值未被测量,节省了 11,553.69 美元:临床实验室工作人员与提出申请的临床医生达成共识,并根据 CRP 值设计了一项干预措施来减少急诊室的 PCT 检测,从而减少了 PCT 检测,并节省了大量经济开支。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信