Faisal S Jehan, Sangrag Ganguli, Niklas E Hase, Abhinav Seth, Yong Kwon, Alan W Hemming, Hassan Aziz
{"title":"Does the Surgical Approach Affect the Incidence of Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure in Cirrhotic Patients? An Analysis of the NSQIP Database.","authors":"Faisal S Jehan, Sangrag Ganguli, Niklas E Hase, Abhinav Seth, Yong Kwon, Alan W Hemming, Hassan Aziz","doi":"10.1177/00031348241246175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The association between surgical approach and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in cirrhotic patients is poorly understood. We hypothesize that patients will have similar rates of liver failure regardless of whether they undergo minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) or open liver resection (OLR) in major liver resections. In contrast, there will be lower rates of PHLF in patients undergoing minor hepatectomy via the MILR approach.<b>Methods:</b> Propensity score matching was used to analyze regression by matching the MILR to the OLR cohort. Patient demographics from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, including race, age, gender, and ethnicity, were matched. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, renal failure, dyspnea, dialysis dependence, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (>ASA III) were among the preoperative patient characteristics subject to matching. PHLF (Grade A vs B. vs C) was our primary outcome measure.<b>Results:</b> A total of 2129 cirrhotic patients were included in the study. In the minor hepatectomy group, patients undergoing an OLR were more likely to get discharged to a facility (7.0% vs 4.4%; <i>P</i> = .03), had greater hospital length of stay (5 vs 3 days; <i>P</i> = .02), and had a greater need for invasive postoperative interventions (10.7% vs 4.6%; <i>P</i> < .01). They were also noted to have higher rates of organ space superficial surgical infections (SSIs) (7.3% vs 3.7%; <i>P</i> = .003), <i>Clostridium difficile</i> infection (.9% vs .1%; <i>P</i> = .05), renal insufficiency (2.1% vs .1%; <i>P</i> < .01), unplanned intubations (3.1% vs 1.4%; <i>P</i> = .03), and Grade C liver failure (2.3% vs .9%; <i>P</i> = .03).<b>Conclusion:</b> A higher incidence of PHLF grade C was found in patients undergoing OLR in the minor hepatectomy group. Therefore, in cirrhotic patients who can tolerate minimally invasive approaches, MILR should be offered to prevent postoperative complications as part of their optimization plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"2901-2906"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241246175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The association between surgical approach and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in cirrhotic patients is poorly understood. We hypothesize that patients will have similar rates of liver failure regardless of whether they undergo minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) or open liver resection (OLR) in major liver resections. In contrast, there will be lower rates of PHLF in patients undergoing minor hepatectomy via the MILR approach.Methods: Propensity score matching was used to analyze regression by matching the MILR to the OLR cohort. Patient demographics from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, including race, age, gender, and ethnicity, were matched. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, renal failure, dyspnea, dialysis dependence, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (>ASA III) were among the preoperative patient characteristics subject to matching. PHLF (Grade A vs B. vs C) was our primary outcome measure.Results: A total of 2129 cirrhotic patients were included in the study. In the minor hepatectomy group, patients undergoing an OLR were more likely to get discharged to a facility (7.0% vs 4.4%; P = .03), had greater hospital length of stay (5 vs 3 days; P = .02), and had a greater need for invasive postoperative interventions (10.7% vs 4.6%; P < .01). They were also noted to have higher rates of organ space superficial surgical infections (SSIs) (7.3% vs 3.7%; P = .003), Clostridium difficile infection (.9% vs .1%; P = .05), renal insufficiency (2.1% vs .1%; P < .01), unplanned intubations (3.1% vs 1.4%; P = .03), and Grade C liver failure (2.3% vs .9%; P = .03).Conclusion: A higher incidence of PHLF grade C was found in patients undergoing OLR in the minor hepatectomy group. Therefore, in cirrhotic patients who can tolerate minimally invasive approaches, MILR should be offered to prevent postoperative complications as part of their optimization plan.
背景:肝硬化患者的手术方式与肝切除术后肝功能衰竭(PHLF)之间的关系尚不清楚。我们假设,无论患者是接受微创肝切除术(MILR)还是开放肝切除术(OLR)进行肝脏大部切除,其肝功能衰竭的发生率都相似。相比之下,通过微创肝切除术(MILR)进行小肝脏切除的患者PHLF发生率较低:方法:采用倾向评分匹配法分析 MILR 与 OLR 队列的回归情况。美国外科学院国家外科质量改进计划中的患者人口统计学数据(包括种族、年龄、性别和民族)也进行了匹配。慢性阻塞性肺病、充血性心力衰竭、吸烟、高血压、糖尿病、肾功能衰竭、呼吸困难、透析依赖、体重指数和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级(>ASA III)是需要匹配的术前患者特征。PHLF(A级 vs B级 vs C级)是我们的主要结果指标:结果:共有 2129 名肝硬化患者参与了研究。在小肝切除术组中,接受OLR的患者更有可能出院(7.0% vs 4.4%; P = .03),住院时间更长(5天 vs 3天; P = .02),术后更需要侵入性干预(10.7% vs 4.6%; P < .01)。他们的器官间隙浅表手术感染(SSIs)(7.3% vs 3.7%;P = .003)、艰难梭菌感染(.9% vs .1%;P = .05)、肾功能不全(2.1% vs .1%;P < .01)、意外插管(3.1% vs 1.4%;P = .03)和C级肝衰竭(2.3% vs .9%;P = .03)的发生率也较高:结论:在小肝切除术组接受OLR的患者中,PHLF C级的发生率较高。因此,对于可以耐受微创方法的肝硬化患者,应将 MILR 作为优化方案的一部分,以预防术后并发症。
期刊介绍:
The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.