Australian rheumatologists' perception of autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional survey

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ross Penglase, Laila Girgis, Helen Englert, David Ma, John Moore
{"title":"Australian rheumatologists' perception of autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional survey","authors":"Ross Penglase,&nbsp;Laila Girgis,&nbsp;Helen Englert,&nbsp;David Ma,&nbsp;John Moore","doi":"10.1111/imj.16422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is an effective treatment for systemic sclerosis (SSc); however, treatment-related toxicity remains a key issue.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the perceptions of rheumatologists on the use of AHSCT for SSc.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Australian rheumatologists were asked for their opinion on the role of AHSCT, the indications for treatment and the barriers to the use of AHSCT for SSc. A secondary analysis assessed what factors influenced the perception of AHSCT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 77.8% rheumatologists agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that AHSCT is an accepted treatment for SSc. While 65.1% agreed or strongly agreed that treatment-associated mortality was a significant barrier to referral for AHSCT, only 15.2% agreed or strongly agreed that this risk was unacceptable. Progressive lung or skin disease, or lack of response to other therapies, were considered the main referral criteria. A total of 92.0% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that reduction of treatment toxicity would increase their likelihood to refer patients for AHSCT. Rheumatologists who were aware of the correct evidence base were more likely to consider AHSCT an acceptable treatment for SSc (4.21 ± 0.7 vs 3.64 ± 0.9, <i>P</i> = 0.007). Rheumatologists desire improved patient selection criteria and access to treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In this national survey of rheumatologists, AHSCT is considered an accepted therapy. However, concern about toxicity remains a potential barrier to patient referral. Access, studies to refine patient selection and development of AHSCT protocols that improve safety were identified as key areas of need.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imj.16422","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imj.16422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is an effective treatment for systemic sclerosis (SSc); however, treatment-related toxicity remains a key issue.

Aims

To investigate the perceptions of rheumatologists on the use of AHSCT for SSc.

Methods

Australian rheumatologists were asked for their opinion on the role of AHSCT, the indications for treatment and the barriers to the use of AHSCT for SSc. A secondary analysis assessed what factors influenced the perception of AHSCT.

Results

A total of 77.8% rheumatologists agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that AHSCT is an accepted treatment for SSc. While 65.1% agreed or strongly agreed that treatment-associated mortality was a significant barrier to referral for AHSCT, only 15.2% agreed or strongly agreed that this risk was unacceptable. Progressive lung or skin disease, or lack of response to other therapies, were considered the main referral criteria. A total of 92.0% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that reduction of treatment toxicity would increase their likelihood to refer patients for AHSCT. Rheumatologists who were aware of the correct evidence base were more likely to consider AHSCT an acceptable treatment for SSc (4.21 ± 0.7 vs 3.64 ± 0.9, P = 0.007). Rheumatologists desire improved patient selection criteria and access to treatment.

Conclusion

In this national survey of rheumatologists, AHSCT is considered an accepted therapy. However, concern about toxicity remains a potential barrier to patient referral. Access, studies to refine patient selection and development of AHSCT protocols that improve safety were identified as key areas of need.

Abstract Image

澳大利亚风湿病学家对自体造血干细胞移植治疗系统性硬化症的看法:横断面调查。
背景:自体造血干细胞移植是治疗系统性硬化症(SSc)的有效方法:自体造血干细胞移植(AHSCT)是治疗系统性硬化症(SSc)的有效方法;然而,与治疗相关的毒性仍是一个关键问题:方法:询问澳大利亚风湿病学家对AHSCT的作用、治疗适应症以及AHSCT治疗SSc的障碍的看法。一项辅助分析评估了影响AHSCT认知的因素:共有77.8%的风湿免疫科医生同意或非常同意AHSCT是治疗SSc的公认疗法这一说法。65.1%的风湿免疫科医生同意或非常同意治疗相关死亡率是转诊AHSCT的一个重要障碍,但只有15.2%的风湿免疫科医生同意或非常同意这种风险是不可接受的。肺部或皮肤疾病进展或对其他疗法无反应被认为是主要的转诊标准。共有 92.0% 的受访者同意或非常同意减少治疗毒性会增加他们将患者转诊为 AHSCT 的可能性。了解正确证据基础的风湿病学家更有可能认为 AHSCT 是一种可接受的 SSc 治疗方法(4.21 ± 0.7 vs 3.64 ± 0.9,P = 0.007)。风湿病学家希望改进患者选择标准和治疗途径:结论:在这项针对风湿病学家的全国性调查中,AHSCT被认为是一种公认的疗法。然而,对毒性的担忧仍是患者转诊的潜在障碍。获得治疗的机会、完善患者选择的研究以及提高安全性的 AHSCT 方案的开发被认为是主要的需求领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信