Modifiable work stress factors and psychological health risk among nurses working within 13 countries

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Allison A. Norful PhD, Monirah Albloushi PhD, Jiawen Zhao BS, Yuandi Gao BA, Janelle Castro PhD, Erlinda Palaganas PhD, Norielee S. Magsingit EdD, Jocelyn Molo DrPH, Badr Ayed Alenazy MSN, Reynaldo Rivera DNP
{"title":"Modifiable work stress factors and psychological health risk among nurses working within 13 countries","authors":"Allison A. Norful PhD,&nbsp;Monirah Albloushi PhD,&nbsp;Jiawen Zhao BS,&nbsp;Yuandi Gao BA,&nbsp;Janelle Castro PhD,&nbsp;Erlinda Palaganas PhD,&nbsp;Norielee S. Magsingit EdD,&nbsp;Jocelyn Molo DrPH,&nbsp;Badr Ayed Alenazy MSN,&nbsp;Reynaldo Rivera DNP","doi":"10.1111/jnu.12994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Nurses are identified as having higher work stress and poor mental health risk among health care workforce globally. It remains unclear which modifiable stress factors pose the greatest risk for poor psychological health among nursing workforce and needed to inform targeted practice and policy change.</p>\n \n <p>To determine which occupation-related or personal stress factors precipitate higher risk for burnout, depression, anxiety, job satisfaction or intention to leave one's position among nurses globally.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional anonymous survey was administered via email using a snowball recruitment strategy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Academic researchers and clinical industry leaders across 3 global regions collaborated to generate an email listserv of professional nursing contacts for survey distribution. The survey included valid and reliable measures to scale stress factors (Work Stress Questionnaire), and screen for burnout (single item), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-2), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2), resilience (Brief Resilience Scale) and intention to leave one's job (single item). We used logistic regression, first unadjusted and then adjusted for personal and professional characteristics, to determine associations between stress factors and psychological health risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The final sample consisted of responses from 2864 nurses working across 13 countries. Most respondents reported working as a clinical nurse in the Philippines (<i>n</i> = 2275), United States (<i>n</i> = 424) and Saudi Arabia (<i>n</i> = 104). One third of nursing respondents endorsed high burnout and intention to leave their job. Those reporting work conflict had significantly higher odds of burnout (odds ratio 3.18; 95% CI 2.22–4.54) and three times more likely to screen positive for depression (odds ratio 3.02; 95% CI 1.36–6.72) and anxiety (odds ratio 2.92; 95% CI 1.57–5.43). Those endorsing difficulty sleeping were 15 times more likely to screen positive for depression (odds ratio 15.63; 95% CI 2.09–117.06). Lack of social support was significantly associated to higher risk for burnout, job dissatisfaction, depression, anxiety, and intention to leave one's position.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Nurses remain at risk for burnout and poor psychological health stemming from work stress. Factors such as clear workplace goals and assignments, increased engagement, good sleep health and social support may serve as protective factors against suboptimal psychological health, and in-turn poor workforce retention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Relevance</h3>\n \n <p>Nurses reporting conflict in the workplace are three times more likely to screen positive for burnout, depression, and anxiety. Nurses reporting difficulty sleeping are 15 times more likely to screen positive for depression. Several modifiable factors can be targeted to reduce poor psychological health and high workforce turnover among nurses across countries.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":"56 5","pages":"742-751"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnu.12994","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Nurses are identified as having higher work stress and poor mental health risk among health care workforce globally. It remains unclear which modifiable stress factors pose the greatest risk for poor psychological health among nursing workforce and needed to inform targeted practice and policy change.

To determine which occupation-related or personal stress factors precipitate higher risk for burnout, depression, anxiety, job satisfaction or intention to leave one's position among nurses globally.

Design

A cross-sectional anonymous survey was administered via email using a snowball recruitment strategy.

Methods

Academic researchers and clinical industry leaders across 3 global regions collaborated to generate an email listserv of professional nursing contacts for survey distribution. The survey included valid and reliable measures to scale stress factors (Work Stress Questionnaire), and screen for burnout (single item), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-2), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2), resilience (Brief Resilience Scale) and intention to leave one's job (single item). We used logistic regression, first unadjusted and then adjusted for personal and professional characteristics, to determine associations between stress factors and psychological health risk.

Results

The final sample consisted of responses from 2864 nurses working across 13 countries. Most respondents reported working as a clinical nurse in the Philippines (n = 2275), United States (n = 424) and Saudi Arabia (n = 104). One third of nursing respondents endorsed high burnout and intention to leave their job. Those reporting work conflict had significantly higher odds of burnout (odds ratio 3.18; 95% CI 2.22–4.54) and three times more likely to screen positive for depression (odds ratio 3.02; 95% CI 1.36–6.72) and anxiety (odds ratio 2.92; 95% CI 1.57–5.43). Those endorsing difficulty sleeping were 15 times more likely to screen positive for depression (odds ratio 15.63; 95% CI 2.09–117.06). Lack of social support was significantly associated to higher risk for burnout, job dissatisfaction, depression, anxiety, and intention to leave one's position.

Conclusions

Nurses remain at risk for burnout and poor psychological health stemming from work stress. Factors such as clear workplace goals and assignments, increased engagement, good sleep health and social support may serve as protective factors against suboptimal psychological health, and in-turn poor workforce retention.

Clinical Relevance

Nurses reporting conflict in the workplace are three times more likely to screen positive for burnout, depression, and anxiety. Nurses reporting difficulty sleeping are 15 times more likely to screen positive for depression. Several modifiable factors can be targeted to reduce poor psychological health and high workforce turnover among nurses across countries.

在 13 个国家工作的护士中可改变的工作压力因素和心理健康风险。
引言在全球医护人员中,护士被认为工作压力较大,心理健康风险较高。目前仍不清楚哪些可改变的压力因素会对护理人员的心理健康造成最大风险,因此需要有针对性地改变做法和政策。目的:确定哪些与职业相关或个人压力因素会导致全球护士出现职业倦怠、抑郁、焦虑、工作满意度或离职意向的风险较高:设计:采用 "滚雪球 "式招募策略,通过电子邮件进行横断面匿名调查:方法:全球 3 个地区的学术研究人员和临床行业领导者合作,创建了一个专业护理联系人电子邮件列表,用于分发调查问卷。调查内容包括有效可靠的压力因素量表(工作压力问卷)、职业倦怠筛查(单项)、抑郁筛查(患者健康问卷-2)、焦虑筛查(广泛性焦虑症-2)、复原力筛查(简明复原力量表)和离职意向筛查(单项)。我们使用逻辑回归法(首先是未调整的,然后是根据个人和职业特征调整的)来确定压力因素与心理健康风险之间的关联:最终样本包括来自 13 个国家的 2864 名护士的回复。大多数受访者表示在菲律宾(2275 人)、美国(424 人)和沙特阿拉伯(104 人)从事临床护士工作。三分之一的受访护士表示工作倦怠感严重并有意离职。那些报告工作冲突的受访者出现职业倦怠的几率明显更高(几率比 3.18;95% CI 2.22-4.54),抑郁症(几率比 3.02;95% CI 1.36-6.72)和焦虑症(几率比 2.92;95% CI 1.57-5.43)阳性筛查率是其他受访者的三倍。睡眠困难者被筛查出患有抑郁症的几率是其他人的 15 倍(几率比 15.63;95% CI 2.09-117.06)。缺乏社会支持与职业倦怠、工作不满意、抑郁、焦虑和离职意向的高风险密切相关:结论:护士仍有可能因工作压力而产生职业倦怠和心理健康问题。明确的工作目标和任务、更多的参与、良好的睡眠健康和社会支持等因素可作为保护因素,防止出现心理健康不达标的情况,进而防止出现劳动力保留率低的情况:临床相关性:报告工作场所冲突的护士在职业倦怠、抑郁和焦虑方面的阳性筛查率是其他护士的三倍。报告睡眠困难的护士在抑郁症筛查中呈阳性的可能性要高出 15 倍。可以针对几个可改变的因素来减少各国护士的不良心理健康和高员工流失率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信