Clinical outcomes of ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta in a mixed regimen with HP-hMG: a real-world retrospective analysise.

Q3 Medicine
Medical Journal of Malaysia Pub Date : 2024-05-01
L J Lim, A M F Kit, P S Wong
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta in a mixed regimen with HP-hMG: a real-world retrospective analysise.","authors":"L J Lim, A M F Kit, P S Wong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Optimising controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) procedures for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) requires an assessment of the patients' medical history, ovarian reserve, prognostic factors and resources to personalise the treatment plan. Treatment personalisation in IVF is increasingly recognised as being vital in providing a balance of efficacy and safety for patients undergoing the COS procedure. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of an ovarian stimulation protocol employing a personalised dosing algorithm for a novel recombinant FSH (rFSH) derived from a human cell-line - follitropin delta, in a mixed gonadotrophin regimen with human menotrophin (HP-HMG). The main outcome of interest in this study is clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per embryo transfer cycle.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this single-centre, retrospective, non-interventional study of 20 infertility patients, each individual was provided with a personalised COS regimen based on her ovarian reserve biomarker-serum anti- Mullerian hormone (AMH) and body weight, in a gonadotrophin-receptor hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. Personalised dosing of follitropin delta was coadministered with 75 IU of HP-hMG during the COS duration until the final oocyte maturation trigger injection. Ovarian response, pregnancy and safety outcomes resulting from this procedure were assessed and reported here.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following a mean COS duration of 11 days and 50% of patients who underwent frozen embryo transfers, the CPR per started cycle was 70%. The observed CPR from this study was higher than that reported in the follitropin delta Phase 3 studies using rFSH monotherapy stimulation, and additionally showed no incidents of cycle cancellations and no iatrogenic safety risks such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study provides a first glimpse into the favourable benefit: risk profile of a mixed protocol regimen using follitropin delta combined with HP-hMG in a cohort of Asian patients in Malaysia.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Optimising controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) procedures for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) requires an assessment of the patients' medical history, ovarian reserve, prognostic factors and resources to personalise the treatment plan. Treatment personalisation in IVF is increasingly recognised as being vital in providing a balance of efficacy and safety for patients undergoing the COS procedure. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of an ovarian stimulation protocol employing a personalised dosing algorithm for a novel recombinant FSH (rFSH) derived from a human cell-line - follitropin delta, in a mixed gonadotrophin regimen with human menotrophin (HP-HMG). The main outcome of interest in this study is clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per embryo transfer cycle.

Materials and methods: In this single-centre, retrospective, non-interventional study of 20 infertility patients, each individual was provided with a personalised COS regimen based on her ovarian reserve biomarker-serum anti- Mullerian hormone (AMH) and body weight, in a gonadotrophin-receptor hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. Personalised dosing of follitropin delta was coadministered with 75 IU of HP-hMG during the COS duration until the final oocyte maturation trigger injection. Ovarian response, pregnancy and safety outcomes resulting from this procedure were assessed and reported here.

Results: Following a mean COS duration of 11 days and 50% of patients who underwent frozen embryo transfers, the CPR per started cycle was 70%. The observed CPR from this study was higher than that reported in the follitropin delta Phase 3 studies using rFSH monotherapy stimulation, and additionally showed no incidents of cycle cancellations and no iatrogenic safety risks such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Conclusion: The present study provides a first glimpse into the favourable benefit: risk profile of a mixed protocol regimen using follitropin delta combined with HP-hMG in a cohort of Asian patients in Malaysia.

在与 HP-hMG 混合疗法中使用促卵泡素δ刺激卵巢的临床结果:一项真实世界的回顾性分析。
导言:优化体外受精(IVF)的控制性卵巢刺激(COS)程序需要对患者的病史、卵巢储备、预后因素和资源进行评估,以制定个性化的治疗方案。越来越多的人认识到,试管受精中的个性化治疗对于为接受 COS 程序的患者提供疗效和安全性的平衡至关重要。在本研究中,我们旨在评估卵巢刺激方案的疗效,该方案采用了一种新型重组 FSH(rFSH)的个性化剂量算法,该重组 FSH 源自人类细胞系--促性腺激素 delta,与人类促甲状腺激素(HP-HMG)混合使用。本研究关注的主要结果是每个胚胎移植周期的临床妊娠率(CPR):在这项对 20 名不孕症患者进行的单中心、回顾性、非干预性研究中,在促性腺激素受体激素(GnRH)拮抗剂方案中,根据每个人的卵巢储备生物标志物--血清抗苗勒氏管激素(AMH)和体重,为其提供了个性化的 COS 方案。在COS持续期间,个性化的促卵泡激素δ剂量与75 IU HP-hMG联合使用,直到最后一次卵母细胞成熟触发注射。本文评估并报告了这一过程产生的卵巢反应、妊娠和安全结果:平均 COS 持续时间为 11 天,50% 的患者进行了冷冻胚胎移植,每个启动周期的 CPR 为 70%。本研究观察到的 CPR 比使用 rFSH 单药刺激的卵泡刺激素δ 3 期研究报告的 CPR 要高,此外还显示没有周期取消事件,也没有卵巢过度刺激综合征等先天性安全风险:本研究首次揭示了在马来西亚亚洲患者群体中使用卵泡素δ联合 HP-hMG 的混合方案治疗的有利收益:风险概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Malaysia
Medical Journal of Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信