SARS-CoV-2 infection rebound among patients receiving antiviral agents, convalescent plasma, or no treatment: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Blood Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.2450/BloodTransfus.764
Mario Cruciani, Ilaria Pati, Francesca Masiello, Vanessa Piccinini, Simonetta Pupella, Vincenzo De Angelis
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 infection rebound among patients receiving antiviral agents, convalescent plasma, or no treatment: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Mario Cruciani, Ilaria Pati, Francesca Masiello, Vanessa Piccinini, Simonetta Pupella, Vincenzo De Angelis","doi":"10.2450/BloodTransfus.764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is some evidence showing rebound of COVID-19 infections in patients treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir between 2 and 8 days following cessation of the antiviral treatment. COVID-19 rebound is not unique to patients treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, but is also observed in molnupiravir recipients, in patients who did not receive any antiviral treatment and in patients who received convalescent plasma (CP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a systematic review with meta-analysis of clinical trials evaluating rates of virologic and clinical rebound in COVID-19 patients receiving antiviral agents, CP or no treatment. Both randomized clinical trials and controlled cohort studies were considered. The methodological quality of trials was assessed using ROB-2 and ROBIN-1 checklists, and the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were available from 16 trials. The occurrence of virologic rebound was more commonly observed among nirmatrelvir recipients than among untreated patients (relative risk [RR]=2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38-3.28; p=0.0007). No differences were observed in the occurrence of virologic rebound between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir recipients (RR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.71-1.43). Similar rates of virologic rebounds were observed in molnupiravir recipients and untreated patients (RR=1.14; 95% CI: 0.81-1.6). One study in the pre-omicron period compared rates of virologic rebound between patients receiving standard of care with or without CP: no differences were observed between groups (RR=1.04; 95% CI: 0.55-1.99). Rates of clinical rebound were reported in seven trials, five evaluating nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and untreated patients, and two evaluating nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir recipients. No statistically significant differences between groups were observed. For all these comparisons, the certainty of the available evidence was graded as low or moderate.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Virologic rebound of COVID-19 infections appears to be mild and self-limited, and was observed more commonly in nirmatrelvir-ritonavir recipients than in untreated patients, but was also observed in patients treated with molnupiravir or CP.</p>","PeriodicalId":49260,"journal":{"name":"Blood Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":"537-550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2450/BloodTransfus.764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is some evidence showing rebound of COVID-19 infections in patients treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir between 2 and 8 days following cessation of the antiviral treatment. COVID-19 rebound is not unique to patients treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, but is also observed in molnupiravir recipients, in patients who did not receive any antiviral treatment and in patients who received convalescent plasma (CP).

Materials and methods: This was a systematic review with meta-analysis of clinical trials evaluating rates of virologic and clinical rebound in COVID-19 patients receiving antiviral agents, CP or no treatment. Both randomized clinical trials and controlled cohort studies were considered. The methodological quality of trials was assessed using ROB-2 and ROBIN-1 checklists, and the GRADE approach.

Results: Data were available from 16 trials. The occurrence of virologic rebound was more commonly observed among nirmatrelvir recipients than among untreated patients (relative risk [RR]=2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38-3.28; p=0.0007). No differences were observed in the occurrence of virologic rebound between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir recipients (RR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.71-1.43). Similar rates of virologic rebounds were observed in molnupiravir recipients and untreated patients (RR=1.14; 95% CI: 0.81-1.6). One study in the pre-omicron period compared rates of virologic rebound between patients receiving standard of care with or without CP: no differences were observed between groups (RR=1.04; 95% CI: 0.55-1.99). Rates of clinical rebound were reported in seven trials, five evaluating nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and untreated patients, and two evaluating nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir recipients. No statistically significant differences between groups were observed. For all these comparisons, the certainty of the available evidence was graded as low or moderate.

Discussion: Virologic rebound of COVID-19 infections appears to be mild and self-limited, and was observed more commonly in nirmatrelvir-ritonavir recipients than in untreated patients, but was also observed in patients treated with molnupiravir or CP.

接受抗病毒药物、康复血浆或不接受治疗的患者中 SARS-CoV-2 感染的反弹:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
背景:有证据显示,在停止抗病毒治疗后的 2 到 8 天内,接受尼马瑞韦-利托那韦治疗的患者会出现 COVID-19 感染反弹。COVID-19反弹并不是尼马瑞韦-利托那韦治疗患者所独有的,在接受莫仑吡韦治疗的患者、未接受任何抗病毒治疗的患者以及接受康复血浆(CP)治疗的患者中也可观察到COVID-19反弹:这是一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析临床试验,评估了接受抗病毒药物、CP 或未接受治疗的 COVID-19 患者的病毒学和临床反弹率。随机临床试验和对照队列研究均在考虑之列。采用ROB-2和ROBIN-1检查表以及GRADE方法对试验的方法学质量进行了评估:结果:16 项试验提供了数据。与未经治疗的患者相比,接受尼尔马特韦治疗的患者更容易出现病毒学反弹(相对风险 [RR]=2.12; 95% 置信区间 [CI]: 1.38-3.28; p=0.0007)。尼马瑞韦-利托那韦和molnupiravir受试者之间的病毒学反弹发生率没有差异(RR=1.01;95% CI:0.71-1.43)。在接受莫仑吡拉韦治疗的患者和未接受治疗的患者中观察到相似的病毒学反弹率(RR=1.14;95% CI:0.81-1.6)。有一项研究比较了接受标准治疗和未接受 CP 治疗的患者的病毒学反弹率:未观察到组间差异(RR=1.04;95% CI:0.55-1.99)。有七项试验报告了临床反弹率,其中五项评估了接受奈马瑞韦-利托那韦治疗的患者和未接受治疗的患者,两项评估了接受奈马瑞韦-利托那韦治疗的患者和接受莫仑匹拉韦治疗的患者。没有观察到组间有明显的统计学差异。在所有这些比较中,现有证据的确定性被评为低度或中度:讨论:COVID-19感染的病毒学反弹似乎是轻微的、自限性的,与未接受过治疗的患者相比,在接受过尼马瑞韦-利托那韦治疗的患者中更常观察到这种反弹,但在接受过莫仑吡韦或CP治疗的患者中也可观察到这种反弹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Transfusion
Blood Transfusion HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Blood Transfusion welcomes international submissions of Original Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports and Letters on all the fields related to Transfusion Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信