Discrepancies in plantar pressure distribution between affected and unaffected sides in patients with plantar fasciitis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学
Min Gyu Kyung, Dong-Oh Lee, Kihyun Moon, Young Sik Yoon, Dong Yeon Lee
{"title":"Discrepancies in plantar pressure distribution between affected and unaffected sides in patients with plantar fasciitis.","authors":"Min Gyu Kyung, Dong-Oh Lee, Kihyun Moon, Young Sik Yoon, Dong Yeon Lee","doi":"10.1177/10225536241258331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A fundamental understanding of plantar pressure distribution is important for prescribing an appropriate orthosis and applying nonoperative methods, such as stretching exercises, for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Despite existing research on plantar pressure distribution, discrepancies between affected and unaffected sides in unilateral plantar fasciitis patients warrant further investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the plantar pressure distribution in patients with unilateral plantar fasciitis by comparing it with that on the contralateral unaffected side.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed records from 20 consecutive patients diagnosed with unilateral plantar fasciitis, using the unaffected side as the control. The emed<sup>®</sup> pedobarographic system was used to measure the plantar pressure distribution during gait. The analysis was performed using a 4-mask configuration (toes, forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both sides showed no significant differences in radiographic parameters. The affected side showed a significantly higher contact area, maximum force, and force-time integrals in the midfoot. However, the unaffected side demonstrated significantly higher maximum force and force-time integrals in the hindfoot. There was no difference in the distribution of the peak pressure and pressure-time integrals between the two sides in all mask regions. The increased contact area and maximum force in the midfoot on the side with plantar fasciitis may result from heel pain-induced weight transfer from the hindfoot.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study provide a basic understanding of plantar pressure distribution in the treatment of plantar fasciitis and highlight the importance of considering inter-side differences when designing treatment interventions or orthotic devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"32 2","pages":"10225536241258331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536241258331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A fundamental understanding of plantar pressure distribution is important for prescribing an appropriate orthosis and applying nonoperative methods, such as stretching exercises, for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Despite existing research on plantar pressure distribution, discrepancies between affected and unaffected sides in unilateral plantar fasciitis patients warrant further investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the plantar pressure distribution in patients with unilateral plantar fasciitis by comparing it with that on the contralateral unaffected side.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records from 20 consecutive patients diagnosed with unilateral plantar fasciitis, using the unaffected side as the control. The emed® pedobarographic system was used to measure the plantar pressure distribution during gait. The analysis was performed using a 4-mask configuration (toes, forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot).

Results: Both sides showed no significant differences in radiographic parameters. The affected side showed a significantly higher contact area, maximum force, and force-time integrals in the midfoot. However, the unaffected side demonstrated significantly higher maximum force and force-time integrals in the hindfoot. There was no difference in the distribution of the peak pressure and pressure-time integrals between the two sides in all mask regions. The increased contact area and maximum force in the midfoot on the side with plantar fasciitis may result from heel pain-induced weight transfer from the hindfoot.

Conclusion: The findings of this study provide a basic understanding of plantar pressure distribution in the treatment of plantar fasciitis and highlight the importance of considering inter-side differences when designing treatment interventions or orthotic devices.

足底筋膜炎患者患侧与非患侧足底压力分布的差异。
目的:从根本上了解足底压力分布,对于制定合适的矫形器和应用非手术方法(如伸展运动)治疗足底筋膜炎非常重要。尽管已有关于足底压力分布的研究,但单侧足底筋膜炎患者患侧和非患侧之间的差异仍值得进一步研究。本研究旨在评估单侧足底筋膜炎患者的足底压力分布,将其与对侧未受影响侧的足底压力分布进行比较:我们以未受影响的一侧为对照,回顾性地查看了 20 名连续确诊的单侧足底筋膜炎患者的病历。使用 emed® 足底照相系统测量步态时的足底压力分布。分析采用 4 面罩配置(脚趾、前足、中足和后足)进行:结果:患侧和患侧的影像学参数无明显差异。受影响的一侧显示中足的接触面积、最大力和力-时间积分明显更高。然而,未受影响的一侧后足的最大力和力-时间积分明显更高。在所有掩膜区域,两侧的峰值压力和压力-时间积分的分布没有差异。足底筋膜炎患侧中足的接触面积和最大力增加可能是由于足跟痛引起的后足重量转移:本研究的结果为我们提供了治疗足底筋膜炎时足底压力分布的基本认识,并强调了在设计治疗干预措施或矫形器具时考虑两侧间差异的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信