Resting-State EEG Signature of Early Consciousness Recovery in Comatose Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-02005-2
Ayham Alkhachroum, Emilia Fló, Brian Manolovitz, Holly Cohan, Berje Shammassian, Danielle Bass, Gabriela Aklepi, Esther Monexe, Pardis Ghamasaee, Evie Sobczak, Daniel Samano, Ana Bolaños Saavedra, Nina Massad, Mohan Kottapally, Amedeo Merenda, Joacir Graciolli Cordeiro, Jonathan Jagid, Andres M Kanner, Tatjana Rundek, Kristine O'Phelan, Jan Claassen, Jacobo D Sitt
{"title":"Resting-State EEG Signature of Early Consciousness Recovery in Comatose Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Ayham Alkhachroum, Emilia Fló, Brian Manolovitz, Holly Cohan, Berje Shammassian, Danielle Bass, Gabriela Aklepi, Esther Monexe, Pardis Ghamasaee, Evie Sobczak, Daniel Samano, Ana Bolaños Saavedra, Nina Massad, Mohan Kottapally, Amedeo Merenda, Joacir Graciolli Cordeiro, Jonathan Jagid, Andres M Kanner, Tatjana Rundek, Kristine O'Phelan, Jan Claassen, Jacobo D Sitt","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02005-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resting-state electroencephalography (rsEEG) is usually obtained to assess seizures in comatose patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). We aim to investigate rsEEG measures and their prediction of early recovery of consciousness in patients with TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of comatose patients with TBI who were admitted to a trauma center (October 2013 to January 2022). Demographics, basic clinical data, imaging characteristics, and EEGs were collected. We calculated the following using 10-min rsEEGs: power spectral density, permutation entropy (complexity measure), weighted symbolic mutual information (wSMI, global information sharing measure), Kolmogorov complexity (Kolcom, complexity measure), and heart-evoked potentials (the averaged EEG signal relative to the corresponding QRS complex on electrocardiography). We evaluated the prediction of consciousness recovery before hospital discharge using clinical, imaging, and rsEEG data via a support vector machine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 113 of 134 (84%) patients with rsEEGs. A total of 73 (65%) patients recovered consciousness before discharge. Patients who recovered consciousness were younger (40 vs. 50 years, p = 0.01). Patients who recovered also had higher Kolcom (U = 1688, p = 0.01), increased beta power (U = 1,652 p = 0.003) with higher variability across channels (U = 1534, p = 0.034) and epochs (U = 1711, p = 0.004), lower delta power (U = 981, p = 0.04), and higher connectivity across time and channels as measured by wSMI in the theta band (U = 1636, p = 0.026; U = 1639, p = 0.024) than those who did not recover. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for rsEEG was higher than that for clinical data (using age, motor response, pupil reactivity) and higher than that for the Marshall computed tomography classification (0.69 vs. 0.66 vs. 0.56, respectively; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We describe the rsEEG signature in recovery of consciousness prior to discharge in comatose patients with TBI. rsEEG measures performed modestly better than the clinical and imaging data in predicting recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"855-865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02005-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Resting-state electroencephalography (rsEEG) is usually obtained to assess seizures in comatose patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). We aim to investigate rsEEG measures and their prediction of early recovery of consciousness in patients with TBI.

Methods: This is a retrospective study of comatose patients with TBI who were admitted to a trauma center (October 2013 to January 2022). Demographics, basic clinical data, imaging characteristics, and EEGs were collected. We calculated the following using 10-min rsEEGs: power spectral density, permutation entropy (complexity measure), weighted symbolic mutual information (wSMI, global information sharing measure), Kolmogorov complexity (Kolcom, complexity measure), and heart-evoked potentials (the averaged EEG signal relative to the corresponding QRS complex on electrocardiography). We evaluated the prediction of consciousness recovery before hospital discharge using clinical, imaging, and rsEEG data via a support vector machine.

Results: We studied 113 of 134 (84%) patients with rsEEGs. A total of 73 (65%) patients recovered consciousness before discharge. Patients who recovered consciousness were younger (40 vs. 50 years, p = 0.01). Patients who recovered also had higher Kolcom (U = 1688, p = 0.01), increased beta power (U = 1,652 p = 0.003) with higher variability across channels (U = 1534, p = 0.034) and epochs (U = 1711, p = 0.004), lower delta power (U = 981, p = 0.04), and higher connectivity across time and channels as measured by wSMI in the theta band (U = 1636, p = 0.026; U = 1639, p = 0.024) than those who did not recover. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for rsEEG was higher than that for clinical data (using age, motor response, pupil reactivity) and higher than that for the Marshall computed tomography classification (0.69 vs. 0.66 vs. 0.56, respectively; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: We describe the rsEEG signature in recovery of consciousness prior to discharge in comatose patients with TBI. rsEEG measures performed modestly better than the clinical and imaging data in predicting recovery.

Abstract Image

脑外伤昏迷患者早期意识恢复的静息态脑电图特征。
背景:静息状态脑电图(rsEEG)通常用于评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)昏迷患者的癫痫发作情况。我们的目的是研究 rsEEG 测量及其对创伤性脑损伤患者早期意识恢复的预测作用:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为创伤中心收治的 TBI 昏迷患者(2013 年 10 月至 2022 年 1 月)。我们收集了患者的人口统计学特征、基本临床数据、影像学特征和脑电图。我们使用 10 分钟 rsEEGs 计算了以下指标:功率谱密度、置换熵(复杂度指标)、加权符号互信息(wSMI,全局信息共享指标)、Kolmogorov 复杂度(Kolcom,复杂度指标)和心诱发电位(相对于心电图上相应 QRS 波群的平均脑电信号)。我们通过支持向量机使用临床、成像和 rsEEG 数据对出院前意识恢复的预测进行了评估:我们对 134 位患者中的 113 位(84%)进行了 rsEEG 研究。共有 73 名(65%)患者在出院前恢复了意识。意识恢复的患者更年轻(40 岁对 50 岁,P = 0.01)。康复患者的 Kolcom 值也较高(U = 1688,p = 0.01),β 功率增加(U = 1,652 p = 0.003),各通道(U = 1534,p = 0.034)和历元(U = 1711,p = 0.004),较低的 delta 功率(U = 981,p = 0.04),以及通过 wSMI 测量的不同时间和不同通道的连接性(U = 1636,p = 0.026;U = 1639,p = 0.024)。rsEEG 的接收器操作特征曲线下面积高于临床数据(使用年龄、运动反应、瞳孔反应性),也高于马歇尔计算机断层扫描分类(分别为 0.69 vs. 0.66 vs. 0.56;p 结论:在预测创伤性脑损伤昏迷患者出院前的意识恢复方面,rsEEG 测量结果略优于临床和影像学数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信