Experiencia de los pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias inmunomediadas atendidos en una unidad de atención integral multidisciplinar

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
{"title":"Experiencia de los pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias inmunomediadas atendidos en una unidad de atención integral multidisciplinar","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the aspects with the greatest impact on the satisfaction of patients treated in a multidisciplinary unit specialising in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) and to identify areas for improvement in the care model.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional descriptive study using a satisfaction survey structured in three blocks: sociodemographic variables, functional aspects of the unit and satisfaction with the professionals. Immediate satisfaction was measured on aspects related to the care received, the physical structure and the likelihood of recommending the unit.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 168 patients completed the surveys, the mean score of overall satisfaction with the unit was 4.75 (SD:0.4). The regression model showed the relationship between overall satisfaction and unit signage (OR:3.558, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.045, 95% CI: 1.027-12.33), coordination between professionals (OR:9.043, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000, 95% CI: 2.79-29.28) and participation in decision making (OR: 44.836, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000, 95% CI: 5.49-365.97). In terms of immediate satisfaction, the overall Net Promoter Score (NPS) was 87 (excellent). The mean score for coordination with Primary Care was 4.54 (SD:0.8) and they scored waiting time to be seen with 4.49 (SD:0.8), so they have been considered an area for improvement The mean score for coordination with Primary Care was 4.54 (SD:0.8) and they scored waiting time to be seen with 4.49 (SD:0.8), so both were considered areas for improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Coordination between intra-centre professionals and patient participation in decision-making explain the excellent level of patient satisfaction. The monitoring of satisfaction has made it possible to implement immediate improvement actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647924000393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To describe the aspects with the greatest impact on the satisfaction of patients treated in a multidisciplinary unit specialising in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) and to identify areas for improvement in the care model.

Methods

Cross-sectional descriptive study using a satisfaction survey structured in three blocks: sociodemographic variables, functional aspects of the unit and satisfaction with the professionals. Immediate satisfaction was measured on aspects related to the care received, the physical structure and the likelihood of recommending the unit.

Results

A total of 168 patients completed the surveys, the mean score of overall satisfaction with the unit was 4.75 (SD:0.4). The regression model showed the relationship between overall satisfaction and unit signage (OR:3.558, p = 0.045, 95% CI: 1.027-12.33), coordination between professionals (OR:9.043, p = 0.000, 95% CI: 2.79-29.28) and participation in decision making (OR: 44.836, p = 0.000, 95% CI: 5.49-365.97). In terms of immediate satisfaction, the overall Net Promoter Score (NPS) was 87 (excellent). The mean score for coordination with Primary Care was 4.54 (SD:0.8) and they scored waiting time to be seen with 4.49 (SD:0.8), so they have been considered an area for improvement The mean score for coordination with Primary Care was 4.54 (SD:0.8) and they scored waiting time to be seen with 4.49 (SD:0.8), so both were considered areas for improvement.

Conclusions

Coordination between intra-centre professionals and patient participation in decision-making explain the excellent level of patient satisfaction. The monitoring of satisfaction has made it possible to implement immediate improvement actions.

[免疫介导的炎症性疾病患者在多学科综合护理病房就诊的经验]。
目的描述对免疫介导的炎症性疾病(IMIDs)专科多学科病房患者满意度影响最大的方面,并确定护理模式中需要改进的地方:横断面描述性研究,采用满意度调查的结构,分为三个部分:社会人口变量、科室功能方面和对专业人员的满意度。结果:共有 168 名患者填写了调查问卷:共有 168 名患者填写了调查问卷,对病房总体满意度的平均值为 4.75(标准差:0.4)。回归模型显示,总体满意度与单位标识(OR:3.558,P=0.045,95% CI:1.027-12.33)、专业人员之间的协调(OR:9.043,P=0.000,95% CI:2.79-29.28)和参与决策(OR:44.836,P=0.000,95% CI:5.49-365.97)之间存在关系。在即时满意度方面,总体净促进者得分(NPS)为 87(优秀)。与基层医疗机构协调的平均得分为 4.54(标清:0.8),他们对候诊时间的评分为 4.49(标清:0.8),因此这两项都被认为是需要改进的地方:结论:中心内部专业人员之间的协调以及患者对决策的参与是患者满意度极高的原因。通过对满意度的监测,可以立即采取改进措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信