F. E. Martos, L. M. Fennell, M. Naipauer, V. Valencia, A. Folguera
{"title":"The Ancient Configuration of the Southern Central Andes and Paleogeographic Reconstruction of the Late Cretaceous Foreland Basin at 34°40’S","authors":"F. E. Martos, L. M. Fennell, M. Naipauer, V. Valencia, A. Folguera","doi":"10.1029/2023tc008119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The early stages of Andean construction have been barely recognized due to a long history of tectonic superposition during the growth of the orogen. In this work, we present a multi-method approach integrating sedimentological, geochronological, structural, and provenance analyses to reconstruct the architecture of the Late Cretaceous foreland basin at 34°40’S. We identified a new depocenter located in an inner position of the Late Cretaceous foreland basin, a strategic location to understand the sedimentation dynamics near the topographic front of the orogen. Two sandstone samples from the basal and upper sections of the Diamante Formation were collected for detrital zircons dating, which yielded maximum depositional ages between 98 Ma and 91 Ma. The provenance analyses based on U-Pb zircons ages indicated a main source area located to the west, in the incipient orogenic belt, with a complementary contribution from basement rocks, located to the east. Moreover, growth strata documented in these deposits were compared with structural kinematic models, which suggest that some of these deposits are associated with inherited structures, reactivated during the tectonic inversion of the extensional Jurassic Atuel depocenter. Our paleogeographic model comprises an Andean Cordillera flanked by a hinterland basin to the west and a foreland basin to the east, with a deformational front positioned further east compared to previous models.","PeriodicalId":22351,"journal":{"name":"Tectonics","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tectonics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023tc008119","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The early stages of Andean construction have been barely recognized due to a long history of tectonic superposition during the growth of the orogen. In this work, we present a multi-method approach integrating sedimentological, geochronological, structural, and provenance analyses to reconstruct the architecture of the Late Cretaceous foreland basin at 34°40’S. We identified a new depocenter located in an inner position of the Late Cretaceous foreland basin, a strategic location to understand the sedimentation dynamics near the topographic front of the orogen. Two sandstone samples from the basal and upper sections of the Diamante Formation were collected for detrital zircons dating, which yielded maximum depositional ages between 98 Ma and 91 Ma. The provenance analyses based on U-Pb zircons ages indicated a main source area located to the west, in the incipient orogenic belt, with a complementary contribution from basement rocks, located to the east. Moreover, growth strata documented in these deposits were compared with structural kinematic models, which suggest that some of these deposits are associated with inherited structures, reactivated during the tectonic inversion of the extensional Jurassic Atuel depocenter. Our paleogeographic model comprises an Andean Cordillera flanked by a hinterland basin to the west and a foreland basin to the east, with a deformational front positioned further east compared to previous models.
由于在造山运动的发展过程中发生了长期的构造叠加,安第斯山脉的早期构造阶段几乎没有被认识到。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种综合沉积学、地质年代学、构造和产状分析的多方法方法,以重建南纬34°40'晚白垩世前陆盆地的结构。我们在晚白垩世前陆盆地的内部位置发现了一个新的沉积中心,这是了解造山带地形前沿附近沉积动力学的战略要地。研究人员从迪亚曼特地层的基底和上部采集了两个砂岩样本,进行了碎屑锆石测年,得出的最大沉积年龄在 98 Ma 到 91 Ma 之间。根据铀-铅锆石年龄进行的产地分析表明,主要来源区位于西面的初生造山带,东面的基底岩石对其有补充作用。此外,我们还将这些矿床中记录的生长地层与构造运动模型进行了比较,结果表明其中一些矿床与继承构造有关,这些构造在侏罗纪阿图尔沉积中心的伸展反转过程中被重新激活。我们的古地理模型包括一个安第斯科迪勒拉山系,西侧为腹地盆地,东侧为前陆盆地,与之前的模型相比,变形前沿位于更靠东的位置。
期刊介绍:
Tectonics (TECT) presents original scientific contributions that describe and explain the evolution, structure, and deformation of Earth¹s lithosphere. Contributions are welcome from any relevant area of research, including field, laboratory, petrological, geochemical, geochronological, geophysical, remote-sensing, and modeling studies. Multidisciplinary studies are particularly encouraged. Tectonics welcomes studies across the range of geologic time.