Enhancing Profitability of Wheat with Eco-friendly Nitrogen Management Under Restricted Irrigation for Small-scale Farming in India

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
S. C. Tripathi, Nitesh Kumar, Karnam Venkatesh
{"title":"Enhancing Profitability of Wheat with Eco-friendly Nitrogen Management Under Restricted Irrigation for Small-scale Farming in India","authors":"S. C. Tripathi, Nitesh Kumar, Karnam Venkatesh","doi":"10.1007/s42106-024-00300-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The majority of farmers (85%) in Asia operate on small plots (&lt; 2 ha) under low-input conditions to support their livelihoods. Wheat production in India faces challenges due to water scarcity and suboptimal nitrogen (N) management practices. To address this problem, a multi-location (9) field experiment comprising of 9 treatments by including nano and prilled urea alone or in combination was conducted under restricted irrigation conditions (only two irrigations i.e., first at crown root initiation stage and 2nd at flag leaf stage) during 2021–2022 and 2022–2023 in randomised block design with three replications in three agro-climatic regions (NWPZ- North Western Plains Zone, NEPZ- North Eastern Plains Zone and CZ- Central Zone) of India. Results indicated that combining recommended nitrogen (RDN) i.e., 90 kg/ha with two sprays of 5% urea increased grain yield by 4.1% and 41.9% in NWPZ and NEPZ, respectively, over RDN alone. Two sprays of nano urea at tillering and jointing stages significantly outperformed the control (Zero N), increasing grain yield by 14.5%, 34.0%, and 19.2% in NWPZ, NEPZ, and CZ, respectively. Moreover, RDN with two sprays of nano urea increased the grain yield and agronomic efficiency by 12.1% and 12.0% in CZ and 25.2% and 24.6% in NEPZ over RDN alone, respectively. From a net benefit perspective, RDN with two sprays of 5% urea was 6.7 and 70.4% higher in NWPZ and NEPZ over RDN under restricted irrigation. In CZ, applying RDN with two sprays of nano urea provided 15.5% higher net benefit over RDN. The recommendation for wheat cultivation in small-scale farming systems in India under restricted irrigation conditions suggests adopting a nitrogen management approach combining RDN with two sprays of 5% urea in NWPZ and NEPZ or with two sprays of nano urea in NEPZ and CZ improved the productivity, profitability and agronomic efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":54947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant Production","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant Production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-024-00300-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The majority of farmers (85%) in Asia operate on small plots (< 2 ha) under low-input conditions to support their livelihoods. Wheat production in India faces challenges due to water scarcity and suboptimal nitrogen (N) management practices. To address this problem, a multi-location (9) field experiment comprising of 9 treatments by including nano and prilled urea alone or in combination was conducted under restricted irrigation conditions (only two irrigations i.e., first at crown root initiation stage and 2nd at flag leaf stage) during 2021–2022 and 2022–2023 in randomised block design with three replications in three agro-climatic regions (NWPZ- North Western Plains Zone, NEPZ- North Eastern Plains Zone and CZ- Central Zone) of India. Results indicated that combining recommended nitrogen (RDN) i.e., 90 kg/ha with two sprays of 5% urea increased grain yield by 4.1% and 41.9% in NWPZ and NEPZ, respectively, over RDN alone. Two sprays of nano urea at tillering and jointing stages significantly outperformed the control (Zero N), increasing grain yield by 14.5%, 34.0%, and 19.2% in NWPZ, NEPZ, and CZ, respectively. Moreover, RDN with two sprays of nano urea increased the grain yield and agronomic efficiency by 12.1% and 12.0% in CZ and 25.2% and 24.6% in NEPZ over RDN alone, respectively. From a net benefit perspective, RDN with two sprays of 5% urea was 6.7 and 70.4% higher in NWPZ and NEPZ over RDN under restricted irrigation. In CZ, applying RDN with two sprays of nano urea provided 15.5% higher net benefit over RDN. The recommendation for wheat cultivation in small-scale farming systems in India under restricted irrigation conditions suggests adopting a nitrogen management approach combining RDN with two sprays of 5% urea in NWPZ and NEPZ or with two sprays of nano urea in NEPZ and CZ improved the productivity, profitability and agronomic efficiency.

Abstract Image

印度小规模农业在限制灌溉条件下通过生态友好型氮肥管理提高小麦的盈利能力
亚洲大多数农民(85%)在低投入条件下经营小块土地(2 公顷),以维持生计。印度的小麦生产面临着缺水和氮素(N)管理不当的挑战。为解决这一问题,2021-2022 年和 2022-2023 年期间,在印度三个农业气候区(NWPZ- 西北平原区、NEPZ- 东北平原区和 CZ-中央区),采用随机区组设计,三次重复,在限制灌溉条件下(仅两次灌溉,即第一次在冠根萌发期,第二次在旗叶期),进行了由 9 个处理组成的多地点(9)田间试验,其中包括纳米尿素和粒状尿素的单独或组合处理。结果表明,在西北平原区和东北平原区,结合使用推荐氮(RDN)(即每公顷 90 公斤)和两次喷洒 5%尿素,比单独使用 RDN 分别增产 4.1%和 41.9%。在分蘖期和拔节期喷施两次纳米尿素的效果明显优于对照(零尿素),在西北太平洋区、东北太平洋区和中南太平洋区的谷物产量分别增加了 14.5%、34.0% 和 19.2%。此外,与单独使用 RDN 相比,喷洒两次纳米尿素的 RDN 使 CZ 的谷物产量和农艺效率分别提高了 12.1% 和 12.0%,使 NEPZ 的谷物产量和农艺效率分别提高了 25.2% 和 24.6%。从净效益的角度来看,在限制灌溉条件下,西北太平洋区和东北太平洋区喷洒两次 5%尿素的 RDN 比 RDN 分别高出 6.7% 和 70.4%。在 CZ,喷施两次纳米尿素的 RDN 比 RDN 的净效益高 15.5%。对印度限制灌溉条件下小规模耕作制度的小麦种植提出的建议是,采用氮肥管理方法,在 NWPZ 和 NEPZ 结合喷施两次 RDN 和 5%的尿素,或在 NEPZ 和 CZ 结合喷施两次纳米尿素,可提高生产率、收益率和农艺效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IJPP publishes original research papers and review papers related to physiology, ecology and production of field crops and forages at field, farm and landscape level. Preferred topics are: (1) yield gap in cropping systems: estimation, causes and closing measures, (2) ecological intensification of plant production, (3) improvement of water and nutrients management in plant production systems, (4) environmental impact of plant production, (5) climate change and plant production, and (6) responses of plant communities to extreme weather conditions. Please note that IJPP does not publish papers with a background in genetics and plant breeding, plant molecular biology, plant biotechnology, as well as soil science, meteorology, product process and post-harvest management unless they are strongly related to plant production under field conditions. Papers based on limited data or of local importance, and results from routine experiments will not normally be considered for publication. Field experiments should include at least two years and/or two environments. Papers on plants other than field crops and forages, and papers based on controlled-environment experiments will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信