On the bending behavior of hybrid fiber–metal laminates (HFMLs) based on aluminum and glass/Kevlar fibers reinforced epoxy

IF 2.5 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Abou Bakr Medjahed, Lasfer Youcef, Saoudi Toufik, Henniche Abdelkhalek, Zegaoui Abdeldjalil, Derradji Mehdi
{"title":"On the bending behavior of hybrid fiber–metal laminates (HFMLs) based on aluminum and glass/Kevlar fibers reinforced epoxy","authors":"Abou Bakr Medjahed, Lasfer Youcef, Saoudi Toufik, Henniche Abdelkhalek, Zegaoui Abdeldjalil, Derradji Mehdi","doi":"10.1177/14644207241257442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, the mechanical behaviors under flexural loading of fiber–metal laminates (FMLs) comprised of an aluminum alloy reinforced with glass fibers (GFs) and Kevlar fibers (KFs) embedded in an epoxy composite are experimentally investigated. For this purpose, non-FMLs, FMLs, and hybrid FMLs (HFMLs) are tested and their results are compared in terms of the flexural strength and modulus, strain to failure, toughness, interlaminar shear strength (ILSS), and specific properties. Results show that the incorporation of GFs on the compression side and KFs on the tensile side improves the bending properties of the HFMLs compared to the KF-based FMLs, which enhances the laminates’ resistance to bending loads. The HFMLs exhibit improvements of 24%, and 5% in flexural strength and modulus, respectively, compared to the KF-based FMLs. Moreover, hybridization significantly improves strain to failure by up to 115% compared to the GF-based FMLs. Additionally, the ILSS analysis reveals improved values in FMLs compared to non-FML samples, when GF-based FMLs demonstrate higher ILSS than KF-based ones, which can be attributed to GFs’ stiffness and high-quality bonding with the aluminum sheets. HFMLs attain a 19% improvement in ILSS compared to the KF-based FMLs. The failure mechanism depends on the intrinsic features of the studied fibers, while the studied FMLs display better damage tolerance. In this context, the HFMLs present enhanced toughness, delamination resistance, and the ability to prevent crack propagation, positioning them as promising candidates for lightweight structural applications where a balance between strength, stiffness, and toughness is required.","PeriodicalId":20630,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207241257442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, the mechanical behaviors under flexural loading of fiber–metal laminates (FMLs) comprised of an aluminum alloy reinforced with glass fibers (GFs) and Kevlar fibers (KFs) embedded in an epoxy composite are experimentally investigated. For this purpose, non-FMLs, FMLs, and hybrid FMLs (HFMLs) are tested and their results are compared in terms of the flexural strength and modulus, strain to failure, toughness, interlaminar shear strength (ILSS), and specific properties. Results show that the incorporation of GFs on the compression side and KFs on the tensile side improves the bending properties of the HFMLs compared to the KF-based FMLs, which enhances the laminates’ resistance to bending loads. The HFMLs exhibit improvements of 24%, and 5% in flexural strength and modulus, respectively, compared to the KF-based FMLs. Moreover, hybridization significantly improves strain to failure by up to 115% compared to the GF-based FMLs. Additionally, the ILSS analysis reveals improved values in FMLs compared to non-FML samples, when GF-based FMLs demonstrate higher ILSS than KF-based ones, which can be attributed to GFs’ stiffness and high-quality bonding with the aluminum sheets. HFMLs attain a 19% improvement in ILSS compared to the KF-based FMLs. The failure mechanism depends on the intrinsic features of the studied fibers, while the studied FMLs display better damage tolerance. In this context, the HFMLs present enhanced toughness, delamination resistance, and the ability to prevent crack propagation, positioning them as promising candidates for lightweight structural applications where a balance between strength, stiffness, and toughness is required.
基于铝和玻璃/凯芙拉纤维增强环氧树脂的混合纤维-金属层压板(HFML)的弯曲行为
本研究通过实验研究了嵌入环氧树脂复合材料中的玻璃纤维(GFs)和凯夫拉纤维(KFs)增强铝合金的纤维金属层压板(FMLs)在弯曲加载下的机械性能。为此,对非 FML、FML 和混合 FML(HFML)进行了测试,并从弯曲强度和模量、破坏应变、韧性、层间剪切强度(ILSS)和特定性能方面对它们的结果进行了比较。结果表明,与基于 KF 的 FML 相比,在压缩侧加入 GF 和在拉伸侧加入 KF 可改善 HFML 的弯曲性能,从而增强层压板的抗弯曲负荷能力。与基于 KF 的 FML 相比,HFML 的抗弯强度和模量分别提高了 24% 和 5%。此外,与基于 GF 的 FML 相比,杂化还能大幅提高失效应变,最高可达 115%。此外,ILSS 分析表明,与非 FML 样品相比,FML 的 ILSS 值有所提高,其中基于 GF 的 FML 比基于 KF 的 FML 的 ILSS 值更高,这可归因于 GF 的刚度和与铝板的高质量粘合。与基于 KF 的 FML 相比,HFML 的 ILSS 提高了 19%。失效机制取决于所研究纤维的固有特性,而所研究的 FML 具有更好的损伤耐受性。在这种情况下,HFMLs 具有更高的韧性、抗分层能力和防止裂纹扩展的能力,因此很有希望应用于需要平衡强度、刚度和韧性的轻质结构中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
166
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Materials: Design and Applications covers the usage and design of materials for application in an engineering context. The materials covered include metals, ceramics, and composites, as well as engineering polymers. "The Journal of Materials Design and Applications is dedicated to publishing papers of the highest quality, in a timely fashion, covering a variety of important areas in materials technology. The Journal''s publishers have a wealth of publishing expertise and ensure that authors are given exemplary service. Every attention is given to publishing the papers as quickly as possible. The Journal has an excellent international reputation, with a corresponding international Editorial Board from a large number of different materials areas and disciplines advising the Editor." Professor Bill Banks - University of Strathclyde, UK This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信