Innovation generation through formalisation and fairness in university – Industry collaboration

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Thomas Clauss , Tobias Kesting , Matheus Franco
{"title":"Innovation generation through formalisation and fairness in university – Industry collaboration","authors":"Thomas Clauss ,&nbsp;Tobias Kesting ,&nbsp;Matheus Franco","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Relationships between universities and industry are a source of entrepreneurial activity and innovation. Considering the complexity of university-industry (U–I) collaboration though, the underlying activities require formalisation mechanisms to help overcome ambiguity, mismatched objectives, demands and expectations to ensure joint innovation outcomes. Fairness perceptions have also been found to determine the success of inter-organisational relationships. However, to date fairness has not been explored in stakeholder contexts, such as those prevalent during U–I collaboration. This research extends knowledge on U–I collaboration processes by exploring if formalisation mechanisms increase fairness perceptions and joint innovation outcomes. We adopt a survey methodology to explore the experiences of German professors engaging in U–I collaboration. Our findings identify that formalising U–I collaborations, through mechanisms such as clear procedural guidelines and contracts which agree responsibilities and outcome expectations, leads to enhanced perceptions of fairness and trust. Furthermore, both procedural and distributive fairness were found to increase the positive effect of formalisation on joint innovation outcomes. These findings advance U–I collaboration and strategic alliances literature through identifying the importance of perceived fairness, which is often deemed to be as important as material outcomes and will impact upon join innovation outcomes being achieved. Furthermore, this research proves the positive relationship formalisation has on innovation outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 103049"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224000993/pdfft?md5=9b8529c8276735b2a94ee33cb9785f2c&pid=1-s2.0-S0166497224000993-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224000993","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relationships between universities and industry are a source of entrepreneurial activity and innovation. Considering the complexity of university-industry (U–I) collaboration though, the underlying activities require formalisation mechanisms to help overcome ambiguity, mismatched objectives, demands and expectations to ensure joint innovation outcomes. Fairness perceptions have also been found to determine the success of inter-organisational relationships. However, to date fairness has not been explored in stakeholder contexts, such as those prevalent during U–I collaboration. This research extends knowledge on U–I collaboration processes by exploring if formalisation mechanisms increase fairness perceptions and joint innovation outcomes. We adopt a survey methodology to explore the experiences of German professors engaging in U–I collaboration. Our findings identify that formalising U–I collaborations, through mechanisms such as clear procedural guidelines and contracts which agree responsibilities and outcome expectations, leads to enhanced perceptions of fairness and trust. Furthermore, both procedural and distributive fairness were found to increase the positive effect of formalisation on joint innovation outcomes. These findings advance U–I collaboration and strategic alliances literature through identifying the importance of perceived fairness, which is often deemed to be as important as material outcomes and will impact upon join innovation outcomes being achieved. Furthermore, this research proves the positive relationship formalisation has on innovation outcomes.

通过产学合作的正规化和公平性创造创新
大学与产业之间的关系是创业活动和创新的源泉。考虑到产学(U-I)合作的复杂性,基本活动需要正规化机制来帮助克服模糊性、目标不匹配、需求和期望,以确保联合创新成果。人们还发现,公平观念决定着组织间关系的成败。然而,迄今为止,还没有人探讨过利益相关者背景下的公平问题,比如在 U-I 合作中普遍存在的情况。本研究通过探讨正规化机制是否会提高公平性认知和联合创新成果,扩展了对 U-I 协作过程的了解。我们采用调查方法,探索德国教授参与大学间合作的经验。我们的研究结果表明,通过明确的程序指南和约定责任与成果预期的合同等机制,正式化的 U-I 合作会增强公平感和信任感。此外,我们还发现,程序公平和分配公平都能增强正规化对联合创新成果的积极影响。这些研究结果通过确定感知公平性的重要性(感知公平性通常被认为与物质成果同等重要,并将对联合创新成果的实现产生影响),推动了U-I 合作和战略联盟文献的发展。此外,这项研究还证明了正规化对创新成果的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信