Quality Improvement Identifies Healthcare Transition Disparities in Adolescents with Congenital Heart Disease and Disabilities.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2024-05-27 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000732
Catherine C Allen, Briana L Swanson, Xiao Zhang, Ryan J Coller, Krisjon R Olson
{"title":"Quality Improvement Identifies Healthcare Transition Disparities in Adolescents with Congenital Heart Disease and Disabilities.","authors":"Catherine C Allen, Briana L Swanson, Xiao Zhang, Ryan J Coller, Krisjon R Olson","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aim to implement healthcare transition (HCT) education for youth with congenital heart disease (CHD) and assess HCT preparedness for cardiac self-care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An HCT clinic was implemented at an academic pediatric cardiology clinic for CHD youth 17 years of age and older. An educator used transition readiness assessment questionnaires and discussed HCT material. The percentage of eligible youth who received HCT education and the cause for missed occurrences were tracked. Plan-do-study-act cycles began in August 2020 to improve the number of youths reached. Secondary analyses assessed improvement differences among those without cardiac procedures or disabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HCT education provision improved from a mean of 38% to 73% in the 17-year and older age group by December 2022. Communication failure was the leading cause of missed visits in 2021 (30%), reduced to 0 by 2022 following plan-do-study-act cycles. Other missed HCT visits included clinic add-ons after screening, limited staff availability, and unidentified eligibility. Readiness assessments were similar for youth with and without prior cardiac procedures, for example, confidence in taking charge of their health care (<i>P</i> = 0.47) and moving to adult care (<i>P</i> = 0.22). Adolescents with disabilities were significantly less confident than those without disabilities in taking charge of their heart health care (6.3 versus 7.5, <i>P</i> = 0.04) and moving to adult care (4.9 versus 7.4, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a CHD HCT clinic improved successful education delivery. Provider engagement and clinic staffing are important for sustainability. HCT knowledge gaps exist for all adolescents, yet those with disabilities had the greatest deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11132416/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We aim to implement healthcare transition (HCT) education for youth with congenital heart disease (CHD) and assess HCT preparedness for cardiac self-care.

Methods: An HCT clinic was implemented at an academic pediatric cardiology clinic for CHD youth 17 years of age and older. An educator used transition readiness assessment questionnaires and discussed HCT material. The percentage of eligible youth who received HCT education and the cause for missed occurrences were tracked. Plan-do-study-act cycles began in August 2020 to improve the number of youths reached. Secondary analyses assessed improvement differences among those without cardiac procedures or disabilities.

Results: HCT education provision improved from a mean of 38% to 73% in the 17-year and older age group by December 2022. Communication failure was the leading cause of missed visits in 2021 (30%), reduced to 0 by 2022 following plan-do-study-act cycles. Other missed HCT visits included clinic add-ons after screening, limited staff availability, and unidentified eligibility. Readiness assessments were similar for youth with and without prior cardiac procedures, for example, confidence in taking charge of their health care (P = 0.47) and moving to adult care (P = 0.22). Adolescents with disabilities were significantly less confident than those without disabilities in taking charge of their heart health care (6.3 versus 7.5, P = 0.04) and moving to adult care (4.9 versus 7.4, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Implementation of a CHD HCT clinic improved successful education delivery. Provider engagement and clinic staffing are important for sustainability. HCT knowledge gaps exist for all adolescents, yet those with disabilities had the greatest deficits.

质量改进发现患有先天性心脏病和残疾的青少年在医疗过渡方面存在差异。
简介:我们的目标是为患有先天性心脏病(CHD)的青少年开展医疗保健过渡(HCT)教育,并评估他们在心脏自我护理方面的 HCT 准备情况:我们的目标是对患有先天性心脏病(CHD)的青少年实施医疗过渡(HCT)教育,并评估HCT对心脏自我护理的准备情况:方法: 一家学术性儿科心脏病诊所为 17 岁及以上的先天性心脏病青少年开设了 HCT 诊所。一名教育工作者使用过渡准备评估问卷并讨论了 HCT 材料。对符合条件的青少年中接受 HCT 教育的比例以及错过教育的原因进行了跟踪。计划-实施-研究-行动周期从 2020 年 8 月开始,以提高受教育青少年的人数。二次分析评估了无心脏手术或残疾青少年的改善差异:到 2022 年 12 月,17 岁及以上年龄组的 HCT 教育提供率从平均 38% 提高到 73%。在 2021 年,沟通失败是导致漏诊的主要原因(30%),而到 2022 年,经过 "计划-执行-研究-行动 "周期后,漏诊率降至 0。其他错过 HCT 就诊的原因包括筛查后的诊所附加服务、人员有限以及资格不明。曾接受过心脏手术和未接受过心脏手术的青少年的准备情况评估结果相似,例如,对负责自己的医疗保健的信心(P = 0.47)和转向成人护理的信心(P = 0.22)。在负责心脏保健(6.3 对 7.5,P = 0.04)和转到成人保健(4.9 对 7.4,P < 0.001)方面,残疾青少年的信心明显低于非残疾青少年:结论:CHD HCT 诊所的建立提高了教育的成功率。提供者的参与和诊所的人员配备对于可持续发展非常重要。所有青少年都存在 HCT 知识缺口,但残疾青少年的缺口最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信