Evaluation of regional variation in racial and ethnic differences in patient experience among Veterans Health Administration primary care users

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Evan Michael Shannon MD MPH, Kenneth T. Jones PhD, Ernest Moy MD, W. Neil Steers PhD, Joy Toyama DrPH, Donna L. Washington MD MPH
{"title":"Evaluation of regional variation in racial and ethnic differences in patient experience among Veterans Health Administration primary care users","authors":"Evan Michael Shannon MD MPH,&nbsp;Kenneth T. Jones PhD,&nbsp;Ernest Moy MD,&nbsp;W. Neil Steers PhD,&nbsp;Joy Toyama DrPH,&nbsp;Donna L. Washington MD MPH","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate racial and ethnic differences in patient experience among VA primary care users at the Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) level.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Source and Study Setting</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a secondary analysis of the VA Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients-Patient Centered Medical Home for fiscal years 2016–2019.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>We compared 28 patient experience measures (six each in the domains of access and care coordination, 16 in the domain of person-centered care) between minoritized racial and ethnic groups (American Indian or Alaska Native [AIAN], Asian, Black, Hispanic, Multi-Race, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander [NHOPI]) and White Veterans. We used weighted logistic regression to test differences between minoritized and White Veterans, controlling for age and gender.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Collection/Extraction Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We defined meaningful difference as both statistically significant at two-tailed <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 with a relative difference ≥10% or ≤−10%. Within VISNs, we included tests of group differences with adequate power to detect meaningful relative differences from a minimum of five comparisons (domain agnostic) per VISN, and separately for a minimum of two for access and care coordination and four for person-centered care domains. We report differences as disparities/large disparities (relative difference ≥10%/≥ 25%), advantages (experience worse or better, respectively, than White patients), or equivalence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Our analytic sample included 1,038,212 Veterans (0.6% AIAN, 1.4% Asian, 16.9% Black, 7.4% Hispanic, 0.8% Multi-Race, 0.8% NHOPI, 67.7% White). Across VISNs, the greatest proportion of comparisons indicated disparities for three of seven eligible VISNs for AIAN, 6/10 for Asian, 3/4 for Multi-Race, and 2/6 for NHOPI Veterans. The plurality of comparisons indicated advantages or equivalence for 17/18 eligible VISNs for Black and 12/14 for Hispanic Veterans. AIAN, Asian, Multi-Race, and NHOPI groups had more comparisons indicating disparities by VISN in the access domain than person-centered care and care coordination.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We found meaningful differences in patient experience measures across VISNs for minoritized compared to White groups, especially for groups with lower population representation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"59 S2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14328","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate racial and ethnic differences in patient experience among VA primary care users at the Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) level.

Data Source and Study Setting

We performed a secondary analysis of the VA Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients-Patient Centered Medical Home for fiscal years 2016–2019.

Study Design

We compared 28 patient experience measures (six each in the domains of access and care coordination, 16 in the domain of person-centered care) between minoritized racial and ethnic groups (American Indian or Alaska Native [AIAN], Asian, Black, Hispanic, Multi-Race, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander [NHOPI]) and White Veterans. We used weighted logistic regression to test differences between minoritized and White Veterans, controlling for age and gender.

Data Collection/Extraction Methods

We defined meaningful difference as both statistically significant at two-tailed p < 0.05 with a relative difference ≥10% or ≤−10%. Within VISNs, we included tests of group differences with adequate power to detect meaningful relative differences from a minimum of five comparisons (domain agnostic) per VISN, and separately for a minimum of two for access and care coordination and four for person-centered care domains. We report differences as disparities/large disparities (relative difference ≥10%/≥ 25%), advantages (experience worse or better, respectively, than White patients), or equivalence.

Principal Findings

Our analytic sample included 1,038,212 Veterans (0.6% AIAN, 1.4% Asian, 16.9% Black, 7.4% Hispanic, 0.8% Multi-Race, 0.8% NHOPI, 67.7% White). Across VISNs, the greatest proportion of comparisons indicated disparities for three of seven eligible VISNs for AIAN, 6/10 for Asian, 3/4 for Multi-Race, and 2/6 for NHOPI Veterans. The plurality of comparisons indicated advantages or equivalence for 17/18 eligible VISNs for Black and 12/14 for Hispanic Veterans. AIAN, Asian, Multi-Race, and NHOPI groups had more comparisons indicating disparities by VISN in the access domain than person-centered care and care coordination.

Conclusions

We found meaningful differences in patient experience measures across VISNs for minoritized compared to White groups, especially for groups with lower population representation.

Abstract Image

退伍军人健康管理局初级保健用户在患者体验方面的种族和民族差异的地区差异评估。
目的:评估退伍军人综合服务网络(VISN)层面上退伍军人初级保健用户在患者体验方面的种族和民族差异:评估退伍军人综合服务网络(VISN)级别的退伍军人初级保健用户在患者体验方面的种族和民族差异:我们对退伍军人事务部 2016-2019 财年的 "患者医疗体验调查"(Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients-Patient Centered Medical Home)进行了二次分析:我们比较了少数种族和族裔群体(美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民[AIAN]、亚裔、黑人、西班牙裔、多种族、夏威夷原住民或其他太平洋岛民[NHOPI])与白人退伍军人之间的 28 项患者体验指标(获取和护理协调领域各 6 项,以人为本的护理领域 16 项)。在控制年龄和性别的前提下,我们使用加权逻辑回归法来检验少数族裔退伍军人与白人退伍军人之间的差异:我们将有意义的差异定义为在双尾 p 下均具有统计学意义:我们的分析样本包括 1,038,212 名退伍军人(0.6% 亚裔美国人、1.4% 亚裔、16.9% 黑人、7.4% 西班牙裔、0.8% 多种族、0.8% NHOPI、67.7% 白人)。在所有 VISN 中,最大比例的比较结果显示,在 7 个符合条件的 VISN 中,有 3 个 VISN 的亚裔退伍军人、6/10 的亚裔退伍军人、3/4 的多种族退伍军人和 2/6 的 NHOPI 退伍军人存在差异。大多数比较结果表明,17/18 个符合条件的 VISN 对黑人退伍军人和 12/14 个符合条件的 VISN 对西班牙裔退伍军人具有优势或同等优势。与 "以人为本的护理 "和 "护理协调 "相比,"亚洲印第安人"、"亚裔"、"多种族 "和 "非华裔退伍军人 "群体有更多的比较结果表明,各退伍军人服务网点在获得服务方面存在差异:我们发现,与白人群体相比,少数民族群体在各 VISN 的患者体验衡量标准方面存在显著差异,尤其是人口比例较低的群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信