Power Dynamics Perpetuate DEI Inaction: A Qualitative Study of Community Health Clinic Teams.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Laura Marie Ramzy, Samantha Pelican Monson, Helen Weng-Ian Chao, Bethany Hileman, Laura Jean Podewils, Rocio I Pereira
{"title":"Power Dynamics Perpetuate DEI Inaction: A Qualitative Study of Community Health Clinic Teams.","authors":"Laura Marie Ramzy, Samantha Pelican Monson, Helen Weng-Ian Chao, Bethany Hileman, Laura Jean Podewils, Rocio I Pereira","doi":"10.1370/afm.3099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite increased clinician awareness of systemic racism, lack of substantial action toward antiracism exists within health care. Clinical staff perspectives, particularly those of racial-ethnic minorities/persons of color (POC) who disproportionately occupy support staff roles with less power on the team, can yield insights into barriers to progress and can inform future efforts to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI, also referred to as EDI) within health care settings. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of staff members on race and role power dynamics within community health clinic teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semistructured 45-minute interviews with staff members working in community health clinics in a large urban health care system from May to July 2021. We implemented purposeful recruitment to oversample POC and support staff and to achieve equal representation from the 13 community health clinics in the system. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed over 6 months using a critical-ideological paradigm. Themes reflecting experiences related to race and role power dynamics were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort had 60 participants: 42 (70%) were support staff (medical assistants, front desk clerks, care navigators, nurses) and 18 (30%) were clinicians and clinic leaders. The large majority of participants were aged 26 to 40 years (60%), were female (83%), and were POC (68%). Five themes emerged: (1) POC face hidden challenges, (2) racial discrimination persists, (3) power dynamics perpetuate inaction, (4) interpersonal actions foster safety and equity, and (5) system-level change is needed for cultural shift.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding the race and role power dynamics within care teams, including experiences of staff members with less power, is critical to advancing DEI in health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":"22 3","pages":"203-207"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11237218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite increased clinician awareness of systemic racism, lack of substantial action toward antiracism exists within health care. Clinical staff perspectives, particularly those of racial-ethnic minorities/persons of color (POC) who disproportionately occupy support staff roles with less power on the team, can yield insights into barriers to progress and can inform future efforts to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI, also referred to as EDI) within health care settings. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of staff members on race and role power dynamics within community health clinic teams.

Methods: We conducted semistructured 45-minute interviews with staff members working in community health clinics in a large urban health care system from May to July 2021. We implemented purposeful recruitment to oversample POC and support staff and to achieve equal representation from the 13 community health clinics in the system. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed over 6 months using a critical-ideological paradigm. Themes reflecting experiences related to race and role power dynamics were identified.

Results: Our cohort had 60 participants: 42 (70%) were support staff (medical assistants, front desk clerks, care navigators, nurses) and 18 (30%) were clinicians and clinic leaders. The large majority of participants were aged 26 to 40 years (60%), were female (83%), and were POC (68%). Five themes emerged: (1) POC face hidden challenges, (2) racial discrimination persists, (3) power dynamics perpetuate inaction, (4) interpersonal actions foster safety and equity, and (5) system-level change is needed for cultural shift.

Conclusions: Understanding the race and role power dynamics within care teams, including experiences of staff members with less power, is critical to advancing DEI in health care.

权力动力导致 DEI 不作为:社区卫生诊所团队定性研究》。
目的:尽管临床医生对系统性种族主义的认识有所提高,但在医疗保健领域却缺乏实质性的反种族主义行动。临床医护人员的观点,尤其是那些在团队中担任辅助人员角色的少数种族/有色人种(POC)的观点,可以帮助他们深入了解取得进步的障碍,并为今后在医疗机构中推进多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI,也称为 EDI)的工作提供参考。这项定性研究探讨了工作人员对社区卫生诊所团队中种族和角色权力动态的看法:2021 年 5 月至 7 月,我们对一个大型城市医疗保健系统中社区卫生诊所的工作人员进行了 45 分钟的半结构式访谈。我们进行了有目的的招聘,对 POC 和辅助人员进行了超额抽样,以实现系统内 13 个社区卫生诊所的平等代表性。我们对访谈进行了录音、转录,并在 6 个月内采用批判意识形态范式对访谈进行了分析。我们确定了反映种族和角色权力动态相关经验的主题:我们的小组共有 60 名参与者:其中 42 人(70%)是辅助人员(医疗助理、前台文员、护理导航员、护士),18 人(30%)是临床医生和诊所负责人。绝大多数参与者的年龄在 26 至 40 岁之间(60%),女性(83%),并且是 POC(68%)。研究提出了五个主题:(1)太平洋岛屿族裔面临隐性挑战;(2)种族歧视持续存在;(3)权力动态导致长期不作为;(4)人际行动促进安全与公平;(5)文化转变需要系统层面的变革:结论:了解护理团队中的种族和角色权力动态,包括权力较小的工作人员的经历,对于推进医疗保健领域的 DEI 至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信