Comparing Leadership Skills of Senior Emergency Medicine Residents in 3-Year Versus 4-Year Programs During Simulated Pediatric Resuscitation: A Pilot Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003216
Kyle Schoppel, Ashley Keilman, Jabeen Fayyaz, Patricia Padlipsky, Maria Carmen G Diaz, Robyn Wing, Mary Hughes, Marleny Franco, Nathan Swinger, Travis Whitfill, Barbara Walsh
{"title":"Comparing Leadership Skills of Senior Emergency Medicine Residents in 3-Year Versus 4-Year Programs During Simulated Pediatric Resuscitation: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Kyle Schoppel, Ashley Keilman, Jabeen Fayyaz, Patricia Padlipsky, Maria Carmen G Diaz, Robyn Wing, Mary Hughes, Marleny Franco, Nathan Swinger, Travis Whitfill, Barbara Walsh","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The majority of pediatric patients in the United States (US) are evaluated and treated at general emergency departments. It is possible that discrepancies in length of emergency medicine (EM) residency training may allow for variable exposure to pediatric patients, critical resuscitations, and didactic events. The goal of this pilot study was to compare leadership skills of graduating EM residents from 3- to 4-year programs during simulated pediatric resuscitations using a previously validated leadership assessment tool, the Concise Assessment of Leader Management (CALM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, multicenter, simulation-based cohort pilot study that included graduating 3 rd - and 4 th -year EM resident physicians from 6 EM residency programs. We measured leadership performance across 3 simulated pediatric resuscitations (sepsis, seizure, cardiac arrest) using the CALM tool and compared leadership scores between the 3 rd - and 4 th -year resident cohorts. We also correlated leadership to self-efficacy scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data was analyzed for 47 participating residents (24 3 rd -year residents and 23 4 th -year residents). Out of a total possible CALM score of 66, residents from 3-year programs scored 45.2 [SD ± 5.2], 46.8 [SD ± 5.0], and 46.6 [SD ± 4.7], whereas residents from 4-year programs scored 45.5 [SD ± 5.2], 46.4 [SD ± 5.0], and 48.2 [SD ± 4.3] during the sepsis, seizure, and cardiac arrest cases, respectively. The mean leadership score across all 3 cases for the 3-year cohort was 46.2 [SD ± 4.8] versus 46.7 [SD ± 4.5] ( P = 0.715) for the 4-year cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data show feasibility for a larger cohort project and, while not statistically significant, suggest no difference in leadership skills between 3 rd - and 4 th -year EM residents in our study cohort. This pilot study provides the basis of future work that will assess a larger multicenter cohort with the hope to obtain a more generalizable dataset.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The majority of pediatric patients in the United States (US) are evaluated and treated at general emergency departments. It is possible that discrepancies in length of emergency medicine (EM) residency training may allow for variable exposure to pediatric patients, critical resuscitations, and didactic events. The goal of this pilot study was to compare leadership skills of graduating EM residents from 3- to 4-year programs during simulated pediatric resuscitations using a previously validated leadership assessment tool, the Concise Assessment of Leader Management (CALM).

Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, simulation-based cohort pilot study that included graduating 3 rd - and 4 th -year EM resident physicians from 6 EM residency programs. We measured leadership performance across 3 simulated pediatric resuscitations (sepsis, seizure, cardiac arrest) using the CALM tool and compared leadership scores between the 3 rd - and 4 th -year resident cohorts. We also correlated leadership to self-efficacy scores.

Results: Data was analyzed for 47 participating residents (24 3 rd -year residents and 23 4 th -year residents). Out of a total possible CALM score of 66, residents from 3-year programs scored 45.2 [SD ± 5.2], 46.8 [SD ± 5.0], and 46.6 [SD ± 4.7], whereas residents from 4-year programs scored 45.5 [SD ± 5.2], 46.4 [SD ± 5.0], and 48.2 [SD ± 4.3] during the sepsis, seizure, and cardiac arrest cases, respectively. The mean leadership score across all 3 cases for the 3-year cohort was 46.2 [SD ± 4.8] versus 46.7 [SD ± 4.5] ( P = 0.715) for the 4-year cohort.

Conclusions: These data show feasibility for a larger cohort project and, while not statistically significant, suggest no difference in leadership skills between 3 rd - and 4 th -year EM residents in our study cohort. This pilot study provides the basis of future work that will assess a larger multicenter cohort with the hope to obtain a more generalizable dataset.

比较 3 年制与 4 年制急诊医学专业高年级住院医师在模拟儿科复苏过程中的领导技能:试点研究。
目的:在美国,大多数儿科病人都在普通急诊科接受评估和治疗。急诊医学(EM)住院医师培训时间的长短不一,可能会导致接触儿科患者、危重抢救和教学活动的机会不同。本试验研究的目的是使用之前经过验证的领导力评估工具--"领导力管理简明评估"(CALM)--比较三年制和四年制急诊科毕业住院医师在模拟儿科复苏过程中的领导力技能:这是一项前瞻性、多中心、基于模拟的队列试点研究,包括来自 6 个急救住院医师培训项目的即将毕业的三年级和四年级急救住院医师。我们使用 CALM 工具测量了 3 个模拟儿科复苏(败血症、癫痫发作、心脏骤停)中的领导力表现,并比较了三年级和四年级住院医师的领导力得分。我们还将领导力与自我效能得分相关联:我们对 47 名参与研究的住院医师(24 名三年级住院医师和 23 名四年级住院医师)进行了数据分析。在 66 分的 CALM 总分中,3 年制住院医师在败血症、癫痫发作和心脏骤停病例中的得分分别为 45.2 [SD ± 5.2]、46.8 [SD ± 5.0] 和 46.6 [SD ± 4.7],而 4 年制住院医师的得分分别为 45.5 [SD ± 5.2]、46.4 [SD ± 5.0] 和 48.2 [SD ± 4.3]。3 年队列中所有 3 个病例的平均领导力评分为 46.2 [SD ± 4.8],而 4 年队列中的平均领导力评分为 46.7 [SD ± 4.5](P = 0.715):这些数据显示了更大规模队列项目的可行性,尽管在统计学上并不显著,但表明在我们的研究队列中,三年级和四年级的急诊科住院医师在领导技能方面并无差异。这项试点研究为今后的工作奠定了基础,今后将对更大规模的多中心队列进行评估,希望能获得更具普遍性的数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信