Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Radiation Therapy Dose Distributions in Nasopharyngeal Carcinomas: A Preliminary Study Incorporating Multiple Features Including Images, Structures, and Dosimetry.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Yixuan Wang, Zun Piao, Huikuan Gu, Meining Chen, Dandan Zhang, Jinhan Zhu
{"title":"Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Radiation Therapy Dose Distributions in Nasopharyngeal Carcinomas: A Preliminary Study Incorporating Multiple Features Including Images, Structures, and Dosimetry.","authors":"Yixuan Wang, Zun Piao, Huikuan Gu, Meining Chen, Dandan Zhang, Jinhan Zhu","doi":"10.1177/15330338241256594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is currently the most important treatment method for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aimed to enhance prediction accuracy by incorporating dose information into a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) using a multichannel input method. <b>Methods:</b> A target conformal plan (TCP) was created based on the maximum planning target volume (PTV). Input data included TCP dose distribution, images, target structures, and organ-at-risk (OAR) information. The role of target conformal plan dose (TCPD) was assessed by comparing the TCPD-CNN (with dose information) and NonTCPD-CNN models (without dose information) using statistical analyses with the ranked Wilcoxon test (<i>P</i> < .05 considered significant). <b>Results:</b> The TCPD-CNN model showed no statistical differences in predicted target indices, except for PTV60, where differences in the D98% indicator were < 0.5%. For OARs, there were no significant differences in predicted results, except for some small-volume or closely located OARs. On comparing TCPD-CNN and NonTCPD-CNN models, TCPD-CNN's dose-volume histograms closely resembled clinical plans with higher similarity index. Mean dose differences for target structures (predicted TCPD-CNN and NonTCPD-CNN results) were within 3% of the maximum prescription dose for both models. TCPD-CNN and NonTCPD-CNN outcomes were 67.9% and 54.2%, respectively. 3D gamma pass rates of the target structures and the entire body were higher in TCPD-CNN than in the NonTCPD-CNN models (<i>P</i> < .05). Additional evaluation on previously unseen volumetric modulated arc therapy plans revealed that average 3D gamma pass rates of the target structures were larger than 90%. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study presents a novel framework for dose distribution prediction using deep learning and multichannel input, specifically incorporating TCPD information, enhancing prediction accuracy for IMRT in NPC treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11190807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338241256594","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is currently the most important treatment method for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aimed to enhance prediction accuracy by incorporating dose information into a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) using a multichannel input method. Methods: A target conformal plan (TCP) was created based on the maximum planning target volume (PTV). Input data included TCP dose distribution, images, target structures, and organ-at-risk (OAR) information. The role of target conformal plan dose (TCPD) was assessed by comparing the TCPD-CNN (with dose information) and NonTCPD-CNN models (without dose information) using statistical analyses with the ranked Wilcoxon test (P < .05 considered significant). Results: The TCPD-CNN model showed no statistical differences in predicted target indices, except for PTV60, where differences in the D98% indicator were < 0.5%. For OARs, there were no significant differences in predicted results, except for some small-volume or closely located OARs. On comparing TCPD-CNN and NonTCPD-CNN models, TCPD-CNN's dose-volume histograms closely resembled clinical plans with higher similarity index. Mean dose differences for target structures (predicted TCPD-CNN and NonTCPD-CNN results) were within 3% of the maximum prescription dose for both models. TCPD-CNN and NonTCPD-CNN outcomes were 67.9% and 54.2%, respectively. 3D gamma pass rates of the target structures and the entire body were higher in TCPD-CNN than in the NonTCPD-CNN models (P < .05). Additional evaluation on previously unseen volumetric modulated arc therapy plans revealed that average 3D gamma pass rates of the target structures were larger than 90%. Conclusions: This study presents a novel framework for dose distribution prediction using deep learning and multichannel input, specifically incorporating TCPD information, enhancing prediction accuracy for IMRT in NPC treatment.

基于深度学习的鼻咽癌放射治疗剂量分布预测:结合图像、结构和剂量测定等多种特征的初步研究。
目的:调强放射治疗(IMRT)是目前治疗鼻咽癌(NPC)最重要的方法。本研究旨在利用多通道输入法将剂量信息纳入深度卷积神经网络(CNN),从而提高预测准确性。方法:根据最大规划靶体积(PTV)创建目标适形计划(TCP)。输入数据包括 TCP 剂量分布、图像、目标结构和风险器官 (OAR) 信息。通过对 TCPD-CNN(包含剂量信息)和非 TCPD-CNN 模型(不包含剂量信息)进行比较,并使用 Wilcoxon 秩序检验(P 结果)进行统计分析,评估了目标适形计划剂量(TCPD)的作用:TCPD-CNN 模型在预测目标指数方面没有统计学差异,但 PTV60 除外,其 D98% 指标的差异为 P 结论:本研究提出了一种利用深度学习和多通道输入进行剂量分布预测的新型框架,特别是结合了 TCPD 信息,提高了鼻咽癌治疗中 IMRT 的预测准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信