Association between Group B Streptococcus and Clinical Chorioamnionitis by Gestational Week at Delivery-A Multicenter Cohort Study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1055/a-2334-7088
Jennifer A McCoy, Tzuria Peled, Ari Weiss, Lisa D Levine, Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky, Misgav Rottenstreich
{"title":"Association between Group B Streptococcus and Clinical Chorioamnionitis by Gestational Week at Delivery-A Multicenter Cohort Study.","authors":"Jennifer A McCoy, Tzuria Peled, Ari Weiss, Lisa D Levine, Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky, Misgav Rottenstreich","doi":"10.1055/a-2334-7088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> In the era of group B <i>Streptococcus</i> (GBS) screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), GBS colonization has been associated with a lower risk of chorioamnionitis, possibly due to a protective effect of IAP. We sought to confirm this finding and assess whether this association varies by gestational week at delivery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> We performed a retrospective cohort study of term (37.0-42.6 weeks), singleton parturients with known GBS status who delivered from 2005 to 2021 at two academic medical centers in Israel. We excluded patients who underwent planned cesarean, out of hospital birth, or had a fetal demise. Patients received GBS screening and IAP for GBS positivity as routine clinical care. The primary outcome was a diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis as determined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision code, compared between GBS-positive and -negative groups, and assessed by gestational week at delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of 292,126 deliveries, 155,255 met inclusion criteria. In total, 30.1% were GBS positive and 69.9% were negative. GBS-positive patients were 21% less likely to be diagnosed with clinical chorioamnionitis than GBS-negative patients, even after controlling for confounders (1.5 vs. 2.2%, adjusted odds ratio: 0.79, 95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.92). When assessed by gestational week at delivery, there was a significantly greater difference in rates of clinical chorioamnionitis between GBS-positive versus GBS-negative groups with advancing gestational age: 1.5-fold difference at 38 to 40 weeks, but a twofold difference at 42 weeks. The risk of clinical chorioamnionitis remained stable in the GBS-positive group, but increased significantly in the GBS-negative group at 41- and 42-week gestation (2.0 vs. 2.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.01 at 41 weeks; up to 3.9% at 42 weeks, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In a large multicenter cohort with universal GBS screening and IAP, GBS positivity was associated with a lower risk of chorioamnionitis, driven by an increasing rate of chorioamnionitis among GBS-negative patients after 40 weeks.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· GBS positivity and IAP may be associated with lower risk of chorioamnionitis.. · GBS-positive patients were less likely to be diagnosed with chorioamnionitis.. · This difference increased with advancing gestational age after 40 weeks..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"181-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2334-7088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  In the era of group B Streptococcus (GBS) screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), GBS colonization has been associated with a lower risk of chorioamnionitis, possibly due to a protective effect of IAP. We sought to confirm this finding and assess whether this association varies by gestational week at delivery.

Study design:  We performed a retrospective cohort study of term (37.0-42.6 weeks), singleton parturients with known GBS status who delivered from 2005 to 2021 at two academic medical centers in Israel. We excluded patients who underwent planned cesarean, out of hospital birth, or had a fetal demise. Patients received GBS screening and IAP for GBS positivity as routine clinical care. The primary outcome was a diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis as determined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision code, compared between GBS-positive and -negative groups, and assessed by gestational week at delivery.

Results:  Of 292,126 deliveries, 155,255 met inclusion criteria. In total, 30.1% were GBS positive and 69.9% were negative. GBS-positive patients were 21% less likely to be diagnosed with clinical chorioamnionitis than GBS-negative patients, even after controlling for confounders (1.5 vs. 2.2%, adjusted odds ratio: 0.79, 95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.92). When assessed by gestational week at delivery, there was a significantly greater difference in rates of clinical chorioamnionitis between GBS-positive versus GBS-negative groups with advancing gestational age: 1.5-fold difference at 38 to 40 weeks, but a twofold difference at 42 weeks. The risk of clinical chorioamnionitis remained stable in the GBS-positive group, but increased significantly in the GBS-negative group at 41- and 42-week gestation (2.0 vs. 2.9%, p < 0.01 at 41 weeks; up to 3.9% at 42 weeks, p < 0.01).

Conclusion:  In a large multicenter cohort with universal GBS screening and IAP, GBS positivity was associated with a lower risk of chorioamnionitis, driven by an increasing rate of chorioamnionitis among GBS-negative patients after 40 weeks.

Key points: · GBS positivity and IAP may be associated with lower risk of chorioamnionitis.. · GBS-positive patients were less likely to be diagnosed with chorioamnionitis.. · This difference increased with advancing gestational age after 40 weeks..

按分娩时孕周划分的 B 组链球菌与临床绒毛膜羊膜炎之间的关系--一项多中心队列研究。
目的:在 B 族链球菌(GBS)筛查和产前抗生素预防(IAP)时代,GBS 定植与绒毛膜羊膜炎的低风险相关,这可能是由于 IAP 的保护作用。我们试图证实这一发现,并评估这种关联是否会因分娩时孕周而异:我们对 2005-2021 年期间在以色列两家学术医疗中心分娩的已知患有 GBS 的足月(37.0-42.6 周)单胎产妇进行了回顾性队列研究。我们排除了计划剖宫产、院外分娩或胎儿夭折的患者。作为常规临床护理,患者接受了 GBS 筛查和 GBS 阳性 IAP 检查。主要结果是根据 ICD-10 编码确定临床绒毛膜羊膜炎的诊断,比较 GBS 阳性组和阴性组,并按分娩时的孕周进行评估:在 292 126 例分娩中,155 255 例符合纳入标准。30.1%为 GBS 阳性,69.9%为阴性。GBS 阳性患者被诊断为临床绒毛膜羊膜炎的几率比 GBS 阴性患者低 21%,即使在控制了混杂因素后也是如此(1.5% 对 2.2%,aOR 0.79,95%CI [0.68-0.92])。如果按照分娩时的孕周进行评估,随着孕周的增加,GBS 阳性组与 GBS 阴性组之间的临床绒毛膜羊膜炎发生率差异显著增大:38-40 周时差异为 1.5 倍,而 42 周时差异为 2 倍。GBS 阳性组发生临床绒毛膜羊膜炎的风险保持稳定,但在妊娠 41 和 42 周时,GBS 阴性组发生临床绒毛膜羊膜炎的风险显著增加(2.0% vs. 2.9%,p):在一个普遍进行 GBS 筛查和 IAP 的大型多中心队列中,GBS 阳性与较低的绒毛膜羊膜炎风险相关,这是因为 40 周后 GBS 阴性患者的绒毛膜羊膜炎发生率增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信