Evaluation of Aspirin Prescribing and Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Adults 60 Years of Age and Older in a Large, Academic Health System.

Q2 Medicine
Kristin L Potthast, Sarah J Billups, Danielle R Fixen, Oliver Titus, Joseph J Saseen, Sunny A Linnebur
{"title":"Evaluation of Aspirin Prescribing and Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Adults 60 Years of Age and Older in a Large, Academic Health System.","authors":"Kristin L Potthast, Sarah J Billups, Danielle R Fixen, Oliver Titus, Joseph J Saseen, Sunny A Linnebur","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> National guidelines no longer recommend adults 60 years of age and older to begin treatment with low-dose daily aspirin for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to a lack of proven net benefit and a higher risk of bleeding. <b>Objective</b> The objective of this cross-sectional retrospective analysis was to evaluate the appropriateness of low-dose aspirin prescribing and subsequent gastrointestinal bleeding in older persons receiving primary care in a large academic health system. <b>Setting</b> Large, academic health system within Colorado. <b>Patients</b> Patients with an active order for daily low-dose aspirin as of July 1, 2021, were assessed for appropriateness based on indication (primary vs secondary prevention) and use of a concomitant proton-pump inhibitor (PPI). Incident gastrointestinal bleeds (GIBs) in the subsequent 12 months and GIB risk factors were also evaluated. <b>Results</b> A total of 19,525 patients were included in the analysis. Eighty-nine percent of patients identified as White and 54% identified as male. Of the total cohort, 44% had CVD and 19% were co-prescribed a PPI. GIB occurred in 247 patients (1.27%) within the subsequent year. Risk factors significantly associated with a GIB within 1 year included: history of GIB, history of peptic ulcer disease, other esophageal issue (esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, Mallory Weiss tears, etc.), 75 years of age or older, and history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. <b>Conclusion</b> This evaluation found that many older persons at this institution may be inappropriately prescribed aspirin, providing opportunities for pharmacists to improve medication safety by deprescribing aspirin among primary prevention patients or potentially co-prescribing a PPI in secondary prevention patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"39 6","pages":"218-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Senior Care Pharmacist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2024.218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background National guidelines no longer recommend adults 60 years of age and older to begin treatment with low-dose daily aspirin for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to a lack of proven net benefit and a higher risk of bleeding. Objective The objective of this cross-sectional retrospective analysis was to evaluate the appropriateness of low-dose aspirin prescribing and subsequent gastrointestinal bleeding in older persons receiving primary care in a large academic health system. Setting Large, academic health system within Colorado. Patients Patients with an active order for daily low-dose aspirin as of July 1, 2021, were assessed for appropriateness based on indication (primary vs secondary prevention) and use of a concomitant proton-pump inhibitor (PPI). Incident gastrointestinal bleeds (GIBs) in the subsequent 12 months and GIB risk factors were also evaluated. Results A total of 19,525 patients were included in the analysis. Eighty-nine percent of patients identified as White and 54% identified as male. Of the total cohort, 44% had CVD and 19% were co-prescribed a PPI. GIB occurred in 247 patients (1.27%) within the subsequent year. Risk factors significantly associated with a GIB within 1 year included: history of GIB, history of peptic ulcer disease, other esophageal issue (esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, Mallory Weiss tears, etc.), 75 years of age or older, and history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Conclusion This evaluation found that many older persons at this institution may be inappropriately prescribed aspirin, providing opportunities for pharmacists to improve medication safety by deprescribing aspirin among primary prevention patients or potentially co-prescribing a PPI in secondary prevention patients.

评估一个大型学术医疗系统中 60 岁及以上成人的阿司匹林处方和胃肠道出血情况。
背景 国家指南不再建议 60 岁及以上的成年人开始每日服用小剂量阿司匹林治疗动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(CVD)的一级预防,原因是缺乏经证实的净获益且出血风险较高。目标 该横断面回顾性分析旨在评估在大型学术医疗系统接受初级保健的老年人服用低剂量阿司匹林的适当性以及随后的消化道出血情况。地点 科罗拉多州内的大型学术医疗系统。患者 根据适应症(一级预防与二级预防)和同时使用质子泵抑制剂 (PPI) 的情况,对截至 2021 年 7 月 1 日开具每日低剂量阿司匹林有效处方的患者进行适当性评估。此外,还对随后 12 个月内发生的消化道出血 (GIB) 和 GIB 风险因素进行了评估。结果 共有19525名患者参与了分析。89%的患者为白人,54%为男性。在所有患者中,44%患有心血管疾病,19%同时服用了PPI。有 247 名患者(1.27%)在随后一年内发生了 GIB。与一年内发生 GIB 关系密切的风险因素包括:GIB 病史、消化性溃疡病史、其他食管问题(食管炎、巴雷特食管、马洛里-魏斯撕裂等)、75 岁或以上以及胃食管反流病史。结论 本次评估发现,该机构的许多老年人可能被不适当地处方阿司匹林,这为药剂师提供了机会,通过在一级预防患者中取消阿司匹林处方或在二级预防患者中联合处方 PPI 来改善用药安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Senior Care Pharmacist
Senior Care Pharmacist PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信