Digital health's influence on the association between birth preference and vaginal birth

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Alison K. Brinson MSPH, PhD, Hannah R. Jahnke PhD, Lily Rubin-Miller MPH, Natalie Henrich MPH, PhD, Alex Peahl MSc, MD, Neel Shah MPP, MD, Christa Moss PhD
{"title":"Digital health's influence on the association between birth preference and vaginal birth","authors":"Alison K. Brinson MSPH, PhD,&nbsp;Hannah R. Jahnke PhD,&nbsp;Lily Rubin-Miller MPH,&nbsp;Natalie Henrich MPH, PhD,&nbsp;Alex Peahl MSc, MD,&nbsp;Neel Shah MPP, MD,&nbsp;Christa Moss PhD","doi":"10.1111/birt.12831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Women's preferred mode of birth during pregnancy is predictive of their actual mode of birth. Digital prenatal care services are a promising method for educating women on mode of birth to reduce elective cesareans. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of digital health on the association between birth preference and mode of birth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data come from 5409 pregnant women enrolled in a digital platform for women's and family health. Multi-trajectory modeling identified trajectories of digital health usage throughout pregnancy. Adjusted logistic regression models tested associations between birth preferences and mode of birth. The modifying effect of digital health usage on the association between birth preference and mode of birth was assessed on the multiplicative scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four distinct trajectories of digital service usage were identified and labeled as: (1) baseline users (52%): the reference group; (2) just-in timers (16%): high usage during the third trimester; (3) learners (26%): high educational resource usage (e.g., articles and classes) throughout pregnancy; and (4) super users (6%): high usage of both education and care resources throughout pregnancy. Overall, preferred mode of birth at enrollment was predictive of actual mode of birth; however, digital health usage moderated this association, whereby super users and learners who preferred a cesarean at enrollment were more likely to deliver vaginally, compared to baseline users who preferred a cesarean.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>For the increasing proportion of women considering an elective cesarean, education through a prenatal digital health platform may help to encourage vaginal birth and reduce cesarean births.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 4","pages":"752-761"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/birt.12831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Women's preferred mode of birth during pregnancy is predictive of their actual mode of birth. Digital prenatal care services are a promising method for educating women on mode of birth to reduce elective cesareans. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of digital health on the association between birth preference and mode of birth.

Methods

Data come from 5409 pregnant women enrolled in a digital platform for women's and family health. Multi-trajectory modeling identified trajectories of digital health usage throughout pregnancy. Adjusted logistic regression models tested associations between birth preferences and mode of birth. The modifying effect of digital health usage on the association between birth preference and mode of birth was assessed on the multiplicative scale.

Results

Four distinct trajectories of digital service usage were identified and labeled as: (1) baseline users (52%): the reference group; (2) just-in timers (16%): high usage during the third trimester; (3) learners (26%): high educational resource usage (e.g., articles and classes) throughout pregnancy; and (4) super users (6%): high usage of both education and care resources throughout pregnancy. Overall, preferred mode of birth at enrollment was predictive of actual mode of birth; however, digital health usage moderated this association, whereby super users and learners who preferred a cesarean at enrollment were more likely to deliver vaginally, compared to baseline users who preferred a cesarean.

Conclusion

For the increasing proportion of women considering an elective cesarean, education through a prenatal digital health platform may help to encourage vaginal birth and reduce cesarean births.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

数字健康对生育偏好与阴道分娩之间关联的影响。
背景:妇女在怀孕期间首选的分娩方式可预测其实际分娩方式。数字化产前保健服务是一种很有前景的方法,可用于教育妇女选择分娩方式,从而减少选择性剖宫产。本研究旨在评估数字化医疗对分娩偏好与分娩方式之间关联的影响:数据来源于5409名注册妇女和家庭健康数字平台的孕妇。多轨迹建模确定了整个孕期使用数字健康的轨迹。调整后的逻辑回归模型检验了分娩偏好与分娩方式之间的关联。在乘法量表上评估了数字健康使用对生育偏好和生育方式之间关联的调节作用:确定了四种不同的数字服务使用轨迹,并将其标记为(1) 基准用户(52%):参照组;(2) 准时用户(16%):怀孕三个月期间使用率高;(3) 学习者(26%):整个孕期教育资源使用率高(如文章和课程);(4) 超级用户(6%):整个孕期教育和护理资源使用率高。总体而言,注册时首选的分娩方式对实际分娩方式具有预测作用;然而,数字医疗的使用调节了这种关联,与首选剖宫产的基线用户相比,注册时首选剖宫产的超级用户和学习者更有可能经阴道分娩:对于越来越多考虑选择剖宫产的妇女来说,通过产前数字健康平台进行教育可能有助于鼓励阴道分娩,减少剖宫产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信