Public Perceptions of Rotator Cuff Tears.

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
V V N Manohar Devarasetty, John E Kuhn, Eric N Bowman
{"title":"Public Perceptions of Rotator Cuff Tears.","authors":"V V N Manohar Devarasetty, John E Kuhn, Eric N Bowman","doi":"10.3390/clinpract14030058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Background: Full-thickness rotator cuff tears (RCTs) impact 25% of those over 60 and 50% over 80; however, minimal data exists on public understanding; (2) Methods: The primary outcome was to determine the public's baseline understanding of RCTs utilizing a 36-question survey regarding anatomy and function, risk factors, diagnosis and treatment options, and expectations. Secondarily, we evaluated the effect of an educational video and informational handout created by the authors to improve understanding. Participants ≥ 18 years were recruited from the senior author's clinic and online discussion platforms over a 5-month period; (3) Results: Baseline surveys were completed by 382 individuals: 56% men, 64% Caucasian, 27% with at least a master's degree, and 56% with very little or no RCT knowledge. Mean correct answer scores improved from 47% to 68% posteducational intervention (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Males, higher education level, healthcare experience, and a higher self-rated understanding of RCTs were significantly correlated with higher survey performance (<i>p</i> < 0.001); (4) Conclusions: The public's knowledge of RCTs at baseline was poor, with demographic factors correlating with survey performance. The educational intervention effectively enhanced participants' understanding. By focusing on common misconceptions, this data can help clinicians align patient expectations and enhance patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"14 3","pages":"729-738"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11130954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14030058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(1) Background: Full-thickness rotator cuff tears (RCTs) impact 25% of those over 60 and 50% over 80; however, minimal data exists on public understanding; (2) Methods: The primary outcome was to determine the public's baseline understanding of RCTs utilizing a 36-question survey regarding anatomy and function, risk factors, diagnosis and treatment options, and expectations. Secondarily, we evaluated the effect of an educational video and informational handout created by the authors to improve understanding. Participants ≥ 18 years were recruited from the senior author's clinic and online discussion platforms over a 5-month period; (3) Results: Baseline surveys were completed by 382 individuals: 56% men, 64% Caucasian, 27% with at least a master's degree, and 56% with very little or no RCT knowledge. Mean correct answer scores improved from 47% to 68% posteducational intervention (p < 0.001). Males, higher education level, healthcare experience, and a higher self-rated understanding of RCTs were significantly correlated with higher survey performance (p < 0.001); (4) Conclusions: The public's knowledge of RCTs at baseline was poor, with demographic factors correlating with survey performance. The educational intervention effectively enhanced participants' understanding. By focusing on common misconceptions, this data can help clinicians align patient expectations and enhance patient outcomes.

公众对肩袖撕裂的看法。
(1)背景:全厚肩袖撕裂(RCT)影响着 25% 的 60 岁以上人群和 50% 的 80 岁以上人群;然而,有关公众对 RCT 的了解的数据却少之又少;(2)方法:主要结果是通过一项包含 36 个问题的调查,确定公众对肩袖撕裂的基本认识,调查内容涉及解剖和功能、风险因素、诊断和治疗方案以及期望值。其次,我们还评估了作者制作的教育视频和宣传手册对加深理解的效果。在 5 个月的时间里,我们从资深作者的诊所和在线讨论平台上招募了年龄≥ 18 岁的参与者;(3)结果:382人完成了基线调查:56%为男性,64%为白种人,27%至少拥有硕士学位,56%对 RCT 知之甚少或一无所知。教育干预后,平均正确答案得分从 47% 提高到 68%(p < 0.001)。男性、较高的教育水平、医疗保健经验以及对 RCT 较高的自我评价与较高的调查成绩明显相关(p < 0.001);(4)结论:基线时公众对 RCT 的了解较少,人口统计学因素与调查表现相关。教育干预有效提高了参与者的认识。通过关注常见的误解,这些数据可以帮助临床医生调整患者的期望,提高患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信