Object play and problem solving in infancy: Insights into tool use

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Lauriane Rat-Fischer , Kim Plunkett , Auguste M.P. von Bayern , Alex Kacelnik
{"title":"Object play and problem solving in infancy: Insights into tool use","authors":"Lauriane Rat-Fischer ,&nbsp;Kim Plunkett ,&nbsp;Auguste M.P. von Bayern ,&nbsp;Alex Kacelnik","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tool use is primarily, but not exclusively, present in species with otherwise advanced cognitive traits. However, the interaction between such traits and conspecific inter-individual variation in the presence, complexity, or intensity of tool use is far from being established. We addressed this matter among human infants, seeking factors that relate to differences in tool use. We examined, both correlationally and experimentally, whether the propensity to engage in object combinations predicts performance in means–end problem-solving tasks involving or not involving the use of a tool. We tested 71 infants aged 15, 18, 21, and 24 months, dividing them into two subgroups: one exposed to an adult demonstrating object–object combinations (i.e., “prompting” infants to combine objects together) and another with comparable social exposure but where the adult demonstrated single-object manipulations. We found a correlation between the combined level of spontaneous and prompted object combinations and problem-solving performance regardless of the involvement of tools in the problem. However, we did not find differences in tool-use performance between the two demonstration subgroups. The correlational analysis suggests that complexity of play, as measured by the frequency of combining objects, is linked to infants’ problem-solving skills rather than being specifically associated with tool use, as previously suggested in the literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524000973/pdfft?md5=0ee295fbec70ee44344004a1bb4eeeec&pid=1-s2.0-S0022096524000973-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524000973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tool use is primarily, but not exclusively, present in species with otherwise advanced cognitive traits. However, the interaction between such traits and conspecific inter-individual variation in the presence, complexity, or intensity of tool use is far from being established. We addressed this matter among human infants, seeking factors that relate to differences in tool use. We examined, both correlationally and experimentally, whether the propensity to engage in object combinations predicts performance in means–end problem-solving tasks involving or not involving the use of a tool. We tested 71 infants aged 15, 18, 21, and 24 months, dividing them into two subgroups: one exposed to an adult demonstrating object–object combinations (i.e., “prompting” infants to combine objects together) and another with comparable social exposure but where the adult demonstrated single-object manipulations. We found a correlation between the combined level of spontaneous and prompted object combinations and problem-solving performance regardless of the involvement of tools in the problem. However, we did not find differences in tool-use performance between the two demonstration subgroups. The correlational analysis suggests that complexity of play, as measured by the frequency of combining objects, is linked to infants’ problem-solving skills rather than being specifically associated with tool use, as previously suggested in the literature.

婴儿期的物体游戏和问题解决:工具使用的启示
工具使用主要出现在具有其他高级认知特征的物种中,但并非唯一。然而,这些特征与同种个体间在工具使用的存在、复杂性或强度方面的差异之间的相互作用还远未得到证实。我们在人类婴儿中研究了这一问题,寻找与工具使用差异有关的因素。我们从相关性和实验两方面研究了,在涉及或不涉及使用工具的均值问题解决任务中,物体组合的倾向是否会预测成绩。我们对年龄分别为 15、18、21 和 24 个月的 71 名婴儿进行了测试,并将他们分为两个亚组:一个亚组是由成人演示物体与物体之间的组合(即 "提示 "婴儿将物体组合在一起),另一个亚组是由成人演示单个物体的操作,但其社会接触程度相当。我们发现,无论问题中是否涉及工具,自发和提示性物体组合的综合水平与问题解决的成绩之间都存在相关性。然而,我们并没有发现在两个演示分组之间工具使用成绩的差异。相关分析表明,以组合物体的频率来衡量的游戏复杂性与婴儿解决问题的能力有关,而不是像以前的文献中所说的那样与工具的使用特别相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信