The effect of chronic low back pain and lumbopelvic stabilization instructions on gluteus medius activation during sidelying hip movements.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2024.2357130
Myra M Meekins, Audrey Zucker-Levin, Marcie Harris-Hayes, Kunal Singhal, Kyle Huffman, Richard Kasser
{"title":"The effect of chronic low back pain and lumbopelvic stabilization instructions on gluteus medius activation during sidelying hip movements.","authors":"Myra M Meekins, Audrey Zucker-Levin, Marcie Harris-Hayes, Kunal Singhal, Kyle Huffman, Richard Kasser","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2357130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with chronic low back pain (LBP) often demonstrate altered muscle activation with movements that involve the lumbopelvic region and hips.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare gluteus medius activity during sidelying hip abduction (SHA) and sidelying hip abduction-lateral rotation (SHALR) with and without instruction for lumbopelvic stabilization in people with and without chronic LBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted recruiting participants with (<i>n</i> = 17) and without (<i>n</i> = 17) chronic LBP. Gluteus medius activity was recorded with surface electromyography during the performance of SHA and SHALR with and without instructions including the abdominal drawing-in maneuver for lumbopelvic stabilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For SHA and SHALR, there was a significant main effect for instruction for stabilization indicated by a decrease in gluteus medius activity with instructions (<i>p</i> = .001, <i>p</i> < .001). There was not a significant main effect of chronic LBP on gluteus medius activity between groups for either activity. There was no significant interaction effect of pain and instruction for stabilization with SHA or SHALR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Knowledge of changes in gluteus medius muscle activation patterns with trunk stabilization instruction may help clinicians with assessment of exercise performance to optimize gluteus medius activation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"563-570"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2357130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with chronic low back pain (LBP) often demonstrate altered muscle activation with movements that involve the lumbopelvic region and hips.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare gluteus medius activity during sidelying hip abduction (SHA) and sidelying hip abduction-lateral rotation (SHALR) with and without instruction for lumbopelvic stabilization in people with and without chronic LBP.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted recruiting participants with (n = 17) and without (n = 17) chronic LBP. Gluteus medius activity was recorded with surface electromyography during the performance of SHA and SHALR with and without instructions including the abdominal drawing-in maneuver for lumbopelvic stabilization.

Results: For SHA and SHALR, there was a significant main effect for instruction for stabilization indicated by a decrease in gluteus medius activity with instructions (p = .001, p < .001). There was not a significant main effect of chronic LBP on gluteus medius activity between groups for either activity. There was no significant interaction effect of pain and instruction for stabilization with SHA or SHALR.

Conclusion: Knowledge of changes in gluteus medius muscle activation patterns with trunk stabilization instruction may help clinicians with assessment of exercise performance to optimize gluteus medius activation.

慢性腰背痛和腰椎稳定指导对侧卧髋关节运动时臀中肌激活的影响。
背景:慢性腰背痛(LBP)患者在做涉及腰椎和髋部的动作时,肌肉激活往往会发生改变:本研究的目的是比较慢性腰背痛患者和非慢性腰背痛患者在接受和未接受腰椎稳定指导的情况下,在侧卧位髋关节外展(SHA)和侧卧位髋关节外展-侧旋(SHALR)时臀中肌的活动情况:这项横断面研究招募了慢性腰椎间盘突出症患者(17 人)和非慢性腰椎间盘突出症患者(17 人)。在进行SHA和SHALR时,用表面肌电图记录臀中肌的活动情况,并进行和不进行包括腹部牵引动作在内的腰椎稳定指导:就 SHA 和 SHALR 而言,在有指导的情况下,臀中肌活动会减少,这表明指导对稳定有显著的主效应(p = .001,p 结论:在有指导的情况下,臀中肌活动会减少,这表明指导对稳定有显著的主效应:了解臀中肌激活模式随躯干稳定指导的变化,有助于临床医生评估运动表现,优化臀中肌激活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信