Factors Associated with Acute Telemental Health Consultations in Older Veterans.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Erica C Koch, Michael J Ward, Alvin D Jeffery, Thomas J Reese, Chad Dorn, Shannon Pugh, Melissa Rubenstein, Jo Ellen Wilson, Corey Campbell, Jin H Han
{"title":"Factors Associated with Acute Telemental Health Consultations in Older Veterans.","authors":"Erica C Koch, Michael J Ward, Alvin D Jeffery, Thomas J Reese, Chad Dorn, Shannon Pugh, Melissa Rubenstein, Jo Ellen Wilson, Corey Campbell, Jin H Han","doi":"10.5811/westjem.17996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The United States Veterans Health Administration is a leader in the use of telemental health (TMH) to enhance access to mental healthcare amidst a nationwide shortage of mental health professionals. The Tennessee Valley Veterans Affairs (VA) Health System piloted TMH in its emergency department (ED) and urgent care clinic (UCC) in 2019, with full 24/7 availability beginning March 1, 2020. Following implementation, preliminary data demonstrated that veterans ≥65 years old were less likely to receive TMH than younger patients. We sought to examine factors associated with older veterans receiving TMH consultations in acute, unscheduled, outpatient settings to identify limitations in the current process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study conducted within the Tennessee Valley VA Health System. We included veterans ≥55 years who received a mental health consultation in the ED or UCC from April 1, 2020-September 30, 2022. Telemental health was administered by a mental health clinician (attending physician, resident physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) via iPad, whereas in-person evaluations were performed in the ED. We examined the influence of patient demographics, visit timing, chief complaint, and psychiatric history on TMH, using multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 254 patients included in this analysis, 177 (69.7%) received TMH. Veterans with high-risk chief complaints (suicidal ideation, homicidal ideation, or agitation) were less likely to receive TMH consultation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.95). Compared to attending physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants were associated with increased TMH use (AOR 4.81, 95% CI 2.04-11.36), whereas consultation by resident physicians was associated with decreased TMH use (AOR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00-0.59). The UCC used TMH for all but one encounter. Patient characteristics including their visit timing, gender, additional medical complaints, comorbidity burden, and number of psychoactive medications did not influence use of TMH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-risk chief complaints, location, and type of mental health clinician may be key determinants of telemental health use in older adults. This may help expand mental healthcare access to areas with a shortage of mental health professionals and prevent potentially avoidable transfers in low-acuity situations. Further studies and interventions may optimize TMH for older patients to ensure safe, equitable mental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11112672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.17996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The United States Veterans Health Administration is a leader in the use of telemental health (TMH) to enhance access to mental healthcare amidst a nationwide shortage of mental health professionals. The Tennessee Valley Veterans Affairs (VA) Health System piloted TMH in its emergency department (ED) and urgent care clinic (UCC) in 2019, with full 24/7 availability beginning March 1, 2020. Following implementation, preliminary data demonstrated that veterans ≥65 years old were less likely to receive TMH than younger patients. We sought to examine factors associated with older veterans receiving TMH consultations in acute, unscheduled, outpatient settings to identify limitations in the current process.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted within the Tennessee Valley VA Health System. We included veterans ≥55 years who received a mental health consultation in the ED or UCC from April 1, 2020-September 30, 2022. Telemental health was administered by a mental health clinician (attending physician, resident physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) via iPad, whereas in-person evaluations were performed in the ED. We examined the influence of patient demographics, visit timing, chief complaint, and psychiatric history on TMH, using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Of the 254 patients included in this analysis, 177 (69.7%) received TMH. Veterans with high-risk chief complaints (suicidal ideation, homicidal ideation, or agitation) were less likely to receive TMH consultation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.95). Compared to attending physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants were associated with increased TMH use (AOR 4.81, 95% CI 2.04-11.36), whereas consultation by resident physicians was associated with decreased TMH use (AOR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00-0.59). The UCC used TMH for all but one encounter. Patient characteristics including their visit timing, gender, additional medical complaints, comorbidity burden, and number of psychoactive medications did not influence use of TMH.

Conclusion: High-risk chief complaints, location, and type of mental health clinician may be key determinants of telemental health use in older adults. This may help expand mental healthcare access to areas with a shortage of mental health professionals and prevent potentially avoidable transfers in low-acuity situations. Further studies and interventions may optimize TMH for older patients to ensure safe, equitable mental health care.

老年退伍军人进行急性心理健康咨询的相关因素。
简介美国退伍军人健康管理局(Veterans Health Administration)是在全国范围内心理健康专业人员短缺的情况下,利用远程医疗(TMH)提高心理医疗服务可及性的领先者。田纳西谷退伍军人事务(VA)医疗系统于 2019 年在其急诊科(ED)和紧急护理诊所(UCC)试行了远程心理健康(TMH),并于 2020 年 3 月 1 日开始全面提供全天候服务。实施后的初步数据显示,与年轻患者相比,年龄≥65 岁的退伍军人接受 TMH 的可能性较低。我们试图研究老年退伍军人在急诊、非计划门诊环境中接受 TMH 咨询的相关因素,以确定当前流程的局限性:这是一项在田纳西谷退伍军人医疗系统内进行的回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了 2020 年 4 月 1 日至 2022 年 9 月 30 日期间在 ED 或 UCC 接受心理健康咨询的年龄≥55 岁的退伍军人。远程心理健康由心理健康临床医师(主治医师、住院医师、执业护士或助理医师)通过 iPad 进行,而面对面评估则在急诊室进行。我们采用多变量逻辑回归法研究了患者人口统计学、就诊时间、主诉和精神病史对 TMH 的影响:在参与分析的 254 名患者中,177 人(69.7%)接受了 TMH 治疗。有高风险主诉(自杀意念、杀人意念或躁动)的退伍军人接受 TMH 咨询的可能性较低(调整后的几率比 [AOR]:0.47,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.24-0.95)。与主治医师相比,执业护士和助理医师与颞下颌关节疼痛的使用率增加有关(AOR 4.81,95% CI 2.04-11.36),而住院医师的会诊与颞下颌关节疼痛的使用率减少有关(AOR 0.04,95% CI 0.00-0.59)。除一次就诊外,UCC 均使用了 TMH。患者的就诊时间、性别、其他主诉、并发症负担和精神活性药物数量等特征并不影响TMH的使用:结论:高风险主诉、就诊地点和心理健康医生的类型可能是老年人使用远程医疗的主要决定因素。这可能有助于扩大精神卫生专业人员短缺地区的精神卫生医疗服务范围,并防止低危急情况下可能避免的转院。进一步的研究和干预可能会优化老年患者的 TMH,以确保安全、公平的心理保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信