BA v The King and the law of home

IF 1.2 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Chris Martin
{"title":"BA v The King and the law of home","authors":"Chris Martin","doi":"10.1080/10345329.2024.2345416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In BA v The King the High Court decided, by majority, that the offence of breaking and entering did not lie where a man kicked down a door and assaulted his former partner, because the man was stil...","PeriodicalId":43272,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Criminal Justice","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2024.2345416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In BA v The King the High Court decided, by majority, that the offence of breaking and entering did not lie where a man kicked down a door and assaulted his former partner, because the man was stil...
BA 诉国王和家庭法
在 BA v The King 一案中,高等法院以多数票裁定,在一名男子踢倒房门并殴打其前伴侣的情况下,不构成破门而入罪,因为该男子当时仍...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Issues in Criminal Justice
Current Issues in Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信