Associations of sedentary behavior and screen time with biomarkers of inflammation and insulin resistance

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Grace H. Coughlin, Maximilian T. Antush, Chantal A. Vella
{"title":"Associations of sedentary behavior and screen time with biomarkers of inflammation and insulin resistance","authors":"Grace H. Coughlin, Maximilian T. Antush, Chantal A. Vella","doi":"10.1007/s10865-024-00498-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sedentary behavior (SB) has been linked to risk factors of cardiometabolic disease, with inconsistent findings reported in the literature. We aimed to assess the associations of SB with multiple biomarkers of inflammation and insulin resistance in adults. Domain-specific SB, sitting time and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were measured in 78 adults (mean ± SD 52.0 ± 10.8 y). Body fat percentage (BF%) was assessed using multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance. A blood draw assessed glucose, insulin, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), leptin, and adiponectin. Adiponectin-leptin ratio (ALR), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) were calculated. Multivariable linear regression analyses, controlling for age, sex, MVPA, and BF%, were used to assess associations. After adjustment for age, sex and MVPA, total SB (7.5 ± 2.5 h/day) was positively associated with leptin, insulin, HOMA-IR, HOMA-β (Standardized Beta (β) range 0.21–0.32) and negatively associated with ALR (β = -0.24, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 for all). Similarly, total sitting time (7.2 ± 2.9 h/day) was associated with TNF-α (β = 0.22) and ALR (β = -0.26). These associations were attenuated to non-significance after adjustment for BF%. Leisure screen time was detrimentally associated with IL-6 (β = 0.24), leptin (β = 0.21), insulin (β = 0.37), HOMA-IR (β = 0.37), and HOMA-β (β = 0.34), independent of age, sex and MVPA (p &lt; 0.05 for all). Only the associations with insulin (β = 0.26), HOMA-IR (β = 0.26), and HOMA-β (β = 0.23) remained significant after further controlling BF% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Self-reported SB is associated with biomarkers of inflammation and insulin resistance, independent of MVPA, and in some cases BF%.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-024-00498-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sedentary behavior (SB) has been linked to risk factors of cardiometabolic disease, with inconsistent findings reported in the literature. We aimed to assess the associations of SB with multiple biomarkers of inflammation and insulin resistance in adults. Domain-specific SB, sitting time and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were measured in 78 adults (mean ± SD 52.0 ± 10.8 y). Body fat percentage (BF%) was assessed using multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance. A blood draw assessed glucose, insulin, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), leptin, and adiponectin. Adiponectin-leptin ratio (ALR), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) were calculated. Multivariable linear regression analyses, controlling for age, sex, MVPA, and BF%, were used to assess associations. After adjustment for age, sex and MVPA, total SB (7.5 ± 2.5 h/day) was positively associated with leptin, insulin, HOMA-IR, HOMA-β (Standardized Beta (β) range 0.21–0.32) and negatively associated with ALR (β = -0.24, p < 0.05 for all). Similarly, total sitting time (7.2 ± 2.9 h/day) was associated with TNF-α (β = 0.22) and ALR (β = -0.26). These associations were attenuated to non-significance after adjustment for BF%. Leisure screen time was detrimentally associated with IL-6 (β = 0.24), leptin (β = 0.21), insulin (β = 0.37), HOMA-IR (β = 0.37), and HOMA-β (β = 0.34), independent of age, sex and MVPA (p < 0.05 for all). Only the associations with insulin (β = 0.26), HOMA-IR (β = 0.26), and HOMA-β (β = 0.23) remained significant after further controlling BF% (p < 0.05). Self-reported SB is associated with biomarkers of inflammation and insulin resistance, independent of MVPA, and in some cases BF%.

久坐行为和屏幕时间与炎症和胰岛素抵抗的生物标志物的关系
久坐行为(SB)与心血管代谢疾病的风险因素有关,但文献报道的结果并不一致。我们旨在评估久坐行为与成年人炎症和胰岛素抵抗的多种生物标志物之间的关系。我们测量了 78 名成年人(平均年龄为 52.0±10.8 岁)的特定领域 SB、久坐时间和中强度身体活动(MVPA)。使用多频生物电阻抗评估了体脂率(BF%)。抽血评估葡萄糖、胰岛素、C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、瘦素和脂肪连通素。计算了脂肪连素-瘦素比率(ALR)、胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)和β细胞功能(HOMA-β)。在控制年龄、性别、MVPA 和 BF% 的情况下,采用多变量线性回归分析来评估相关性。对年龄、性别和 MVPA 进行调整后,总静坐时间(7.5 ± 2.5 小时/天)与瘦素、胰岛素、HOMA-IR、HOMA-β 呈正相关(标准化 Beta (β) 范围为 0.21-0.32),而与 ALR 呈负相关(β = -0.24,均为 p <0.05)。同样,总久坐时间(7.2 ± 2.9 小时/天)与 TNF-α (β = 0.22) 和 ALR (β = -0.26)相关。在调整 BF% 后,这些相关性减弱为非显著性。休闲屏幕时间与 IL-6 (β = 0.24)、瘦素 (β = 0.21)、胰岛素 (β = 0.37)、HOMA-IR (β = 0.37) 和 HOMA-β (β = 0.34) 不利相关,不受年龄、性别和 MVPA 的影响(均为 p < 0.05)。只有与胰岛素(β = 0.26)、HOMA-IR(β = 0.26)和 HOMA-β (β = 0.23)的关系在进一步控制 BF% 后仍然显著(p < 0.05)。自我报告的 SB 与炎症和胰岛素抵抗的生物标志物有关,与 MVPA 无关,在某些情况下与 BF% 无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Journal of Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders.  Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信