An assessment of peer instruction in large first year mathematics courses

Raymond Vozzo, Stuart Johnson, Jonathan Tuke
{"title":"An assessment of peer instruction in large first year mathematics courses","authors":"Raymond Vozzo, Stuart Johnson, Jonathan Tuke","doi":"arxiv-2405.14151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many recent studies have expounded the benefits of active learning in\ntertiary education. It can be challenging to implement these techniques at\nlarge scale (for example in first year mathematics courses). A common method\nfor actively engaging students in large classes is through online quizzes,\nwhich may include peer instruction. In this paper, we investigate the effect of\nhaving students answer quiz-style questions during class both with and without\ndiscussion in a first year mathematics course. We also investigate the short-\nand long-term effects of each protocol. We find that peer instruction improves student learning in mathematics in the\nfollowing ways: First, when the responses to questions was measured before and\nafter peer instruction the proportion of questions answered correctly increased\nby 0.2; second, when correct responses were compared to similar questions the\nfollowing week the proportion correct increased by 0.34 (compared to 0.07 for\nthe control); finally, when measured at the end of the semester the proportion\nof questions answered correctly increased by 0.42 (compared to 0.2 for the\ncontrol).","PeriodicalId":501462,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.14151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many recent studies have expounded the benefits of active learning in tertiary education. It can be challenging to implement these techniques at large scale (for example in first year mathematics courses). A common method for actively engaging students in large classes is through online quizzes, which may include peer instruction. In this paper, we investigate the effect of having students answer quiz-style questions during class both with and without discussion in a first year mathematics course. We also investigate the short- and long-term effects of each protocol. We find that peer instruction improves student learning in mathematics in the following ways: First, when the responses to questions was measured before and after peer instruction the proportion of questions answered correctly increased by 0.2; second, when correct responses were compared to similar questions the following week the proportion correct increased by 0.34 (compared to 0.07 for the control); finally, when measured at the end of the semester the proportion of questions answered correctly increased by 0.42 (compared to 0.2 for the control).
对一年级大型数学课程中同伴教学的评估
最近的许多研究都阐述了主动学习对高等教育的益处。在大范围内(例如在一年级数学课程中)实施这些技术可能具有挑战性。在大班教学中,让学生积极参与的常用方法是在线测验,其中可能包括同伴指导。在本文中,我们研究了在一年级数学课程中,让学生在课堂上回答问答式问题(包括讨论和不讨论)的效果。我们还调查了每种方案的短期和长期效果。我们发现,同伴教学通过以下方式提高了学生的数学学习成绩:首先,在同伴教学前后测量学生对问题的回答,正确回答问题的比例增加了 0.2;其次,将正确回答与下周的类似问题进行比较,正确回答的比例增加了 0.34(对照组为 0.07);最后,在学期结束时测量,正确回答问题的比例增加了 0.42(对照组为 0.2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信