Replacing the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment—Alcohol revised with the modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale for alcohol withdrawal to support management of alcohol withdrawal symptoms: potential impact on length of stay and complications

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Jane de Lemos, Mazen Sharaf, Susanne Moadebi, Sophie Low-Beer, Brighid Cassidy, Jason M. Sutherland, Christine Deziel, Sree Nagendran
{"title":"Replacing the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment—Alcohol revised with the modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale for alcohol withdrawal to support management of alcohol withdrawal symptoms: potential impact on length of stay and complications","authors":"Jane de Lemos, Mazen Sharaf, Susanne Moadebi, Sophie Low-Beer, Brighid Cassidy, Jason M. Sutherland, Christine Deziel, Sree Nagendran","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00710-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>We evaluated impact on length of stay and possible complications of replacing the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment—Alcohol Revised (CIWA-Ar) scale with a slightly modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (mRASS-AW) to support managing patients admitted with alcohol withdrawal symptoms in a community hospital. Since mRASS-AW is viewed as easier and quicker to use than CIWA-Ar, provided use of mRASS-AW does not worsen outcomes, it could be a safe alternative in a busy ED environment and offer an opportunity to release nursing time to care.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Retrospective time-series analysis of mean quarterly length of stay. All analyses exclusively used our hospital’s administrative discharge diagnoses database. During April 1st 2012 to December 14th 2014, the CIWA-Ar was used in the ED and in-patient units to guide benzodiazepine dosing decisions for alcohol withdrawal symptoms. After this point, CIWA-Ar was replaced with mRASS-AW. Data was evaluated until December 31st 2020. Primary outcome: mean quarterly length of stay. Secondary outcomes: delirium, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, other post-admission complications, mortality.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p><i>N</i> = 1073 patients. No association between length of stay and scale switch (slope change 0.3 (95% CI − 0.03 to 0.6), intercept change, 0.06 (− 0.03 to 0.2). CIWA-Ar (<i>n</i> = 317) mean quarterly length of stay, 5.7 days (95% 4.2–7.1), mRASS-AW (<i>n</i> = 756) 5.0 days (95% CI 4.3–5.6). Incidence of delirium, ICU admission or mortality was not different. However, incidence of other post-admission complications was higher with CIWA-Ar (6.6%) than mRASS-AW (3.4%) (<i>p</i> = 0.020).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>This was the first study to compare patient outcomes associated with using mRASS-AW for alcohol withdrawal symptoms outside the ICU. Replacing CIWA-Ar with mRASS-AW did not worsen length of stay or complications. These findings provide some evidence that mRASS-AW could be considered an alternative to CIWA-Ar and potentially may provide an opportunity to release nursing time to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55286,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"195 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00710-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated impact on length of stay and possible complications of replacing the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment—Alcohol Revised (CIWA-Ar) scale with a slightly modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (mRASS-AW) to support managing patients admitted with alcohol withdrawal symptoms in a community hospital. Since mRASS-AW is viewed as easier and quicker to use than CIWA-Ar, provided use of mRASS-AW does not worsen outcomes, it could be a safe alternative in a busy ED environment and offer an opportunity to release nursing time to care.

Methods

Retrospective time-series analysis of mean quarterly length of stay. All analyses exclusively used our hospital’s administrative discharge diagnoses database. During April 1st 2012 to December 14th 2014, the CIWA-Ar was used in the ED and in-patient units to guide benzodiazepine dosing decisions for alcohol withdrawal symptoms. After this point, CIWA-Ar was replaced with mRASS-AW. Data was evaluated until December 31st 2020. Primary outcome: mean quarterly length of stay. Secondary outcomes: delirium, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, other post-admission complications, mortality.

Results

N = 1073 patients. No association between length of stay and scale switch (slope change 0.3 (95% CI − 0.03 to 0.6), intercept change, 0.06 (− 0.03 to 0.2). CIWA-Ar (n = 317) mean quarterly length of stay, 5.7 days (95% 4.2–7.1), mRASS-AW (n = 756) 5.0 days (95% CI 4.3–5.6). Incidence of delirium, ICU admission or mortality was not different. However, incidence of other post-admission complications was higher with CIWA-Ar (6.6%) than mRASS-AW (3.4%) (p = 0.020).

Conclusions

This was the first study to compare patient outcomes associated with using mRASS-AW for alcohol withdrawal symptoms outside the ICU. Replacing CIWA-Ar with mRASS-AW did not worsen length of stay or complications. These findings provide some evidence that mRASS-AW could be considered an alternative to CIWA-Ar and potentially may provide an opportunity to release nursing time to care.

Abstract Image

用修改后的里士满躁动和镇静量表取代临床研究所酒精戒断评估(修订版),以支持对酒精戒断症状的管理:对住院时间和并发症的潜在影响
目的我们评估了用略微改良的里士满躁动与镇静量表(mRASS-AW)取代临床研究所酒精戒断评估修订版(CIWA-Ar)量表对住院时间和可能出现的并发症的影响,以帮助管理社区医院收治的有酒精戒断症状的患者。由于 mRASS-AW 被认为比 CIWA-Ar 更简便、更快捷,如果使用 mRASS-AW 不会使结果恶化,那么在繁忙的急诊室环境中,它可能是一种安全的替代方法,并为护理人员腾出时间进行护理提供了机会。所有分析均使用本医院的行政出院诊断数据库。在 2012 年 4 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 14 日期间,急诊室和住院部使用 CIWA-Ar 为戒酒症状的苯二氮卓用药决策提供指导。此后,CIWA-Ar 被 mRASS-AW 取代。数据评估截至 2020 年 12 月 31 日。主要结果:平均季度住院时间。次要结果:谵妄、入住重症监护室(ICU)、入院后其他并发症、死亡率。住院时间与量表切换之间无关联(斜率变化为 0.3(95% CI - 0.03 至 0.6),截距变化为 0.06(- 0.03 至 0.2)。CIWA-Ar(n = 317)平均季度住院时间为 5.7 天(95% 4.2-7.1),mRASS-AW(n = 756)为 5.0 天(95% CI 4.3-5.6)。谵妄、入住重症监护室或死亡的发生率没有差异。结论这是第一项比较在 ICU 外使用 mRASS-AW 治疗酒精戒断症状的患者预后的研究。用 mRASS-AW 取代 CIWA-Ar 并不会延长住院时间或增加并发症。这些研究结果提供了一些证据,表明 mRASS-AW 可被视为 CIWA-Ar 的替代品,并有可能为护理人员腾出护理时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
171
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CJEM is a peer-reviewed journal owned by CAEP. CJEM is published every 2 months (January, March, May, July, September and November). CJEM presents articles of interest to emergency care providers in rural, urban or academic settings. Publishing services are provided by the Canadian Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信