Effects of successional age, plot size, and tree size on the relationship between diversity and aboveground biomass in tropical dry forests

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Eric Antonio Gamboa-Blanco, Juan Manuel Dupuy, Carlos A. Portillo-Quintero, Trevor Caughlin, José Luis Hernández-Stefanoni
{"title":"Effects of successional age, plot size, and tree size on the relationship between diversity and aboveground biomass in tropical dry forests","authors":"Eric Antonio Gamboa-Blanco, Juan Manuel Dupuy, Carlos A. Portillo-Quintero, Trevor Caughlin, José Luis Hernández-Stefanoni","doi":"10.1007/s11258-024-01435-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Depending on the strength of the relationship between biodiversity and aboveground biomass (AGB), diversity loss could lead to varied declines in carbon storage, compromising the role of forests as carbon sink. This study assesses different factors affecting the diversity–AGB relationship, including small trees (diameter &lt; 7.5 cm) and considering different diversity metrics (Hill numbers), plot sizes (80, 400 and 1000 m<sup>2</sup>) and successional age categories (8–22, 23–30 and &gt; 60 years). The study compares these relationships across three types of tropical dry forests: deciduous, semi-deciduous, and semi-evergreen. Results reveal the highest deviance values in plots with large trees in the 400 m<sup>2</sup> size (d<sup>2</sup> = 40.4), decreasing when small trees were included (d<sup>2</sup> = 25.8). Higher deviance values show the major contribution of large trees to diversity and AGB of 400 m<sup>2</sup> plots, while lower deviance values indicate the high contribution of small trees to diversity but limited contribution to AGB. When analyzing only large trees, deviance decreased with the order of Hill numbers. However, incorporating small trees increased deviance for higher Hill numbers. This is because abundance of small and large trees together has a greater influence on AGB. The diversity–AGB relationship was more prevalent and stronger in the semideciduous forest, which had marked orographic and successional age variation. The strongest diversity–AGB effect occurred in early successional ages, weakening in older stages. Our results show that accuracy in estimating the diversity–AGB relationship varies with plant size, diversity parameters, plot size and forest type.</p>","PeriodicalId":20233,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-024-01435-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Depending on the strength of the relationship between biodiversity and aboveground biomass (AGB), diversity loss could lead to varied declines in carbon storage, compromising the role of forests as carbon sink. This study assesses different factors affecting the diversity–AGB relationship, including small trees (diameter < 7.5 cm) and considering different diversity metrics (Hill numbers), plot sizes (80, 400 and 1000 m2) and successional age categories (8–22, 23–30 and > 60 years). The study compares these relationships across three types of tropical dry forests: deciduous, semi-deciduous, and semi-evergreen. Results reveal the highest deviance values in plots with large trees in the 400 m2 size (d2 = 40.4), decreasing when small trees were included (d2 = 25.8). Higher deviance values show the major contribution of large trees to diversity and AGB of 400 m2 plots, while lower deviance values indicate the high contribution of small trees to diversity but limited contribution to AGB. When analyzing only large trees, deviance decreased with the order of Hill numbers. However, incorporating small trees increased deviance for higher Hill numbers. This is because abundance of small and large trees together has a greater influence on AGB. The diversity–AGB relationship was more prevalent and stronger in the semideciduous forest, which had marked orographic and successional age variation. The strongest diversity–AGB effect occurred in early successional ages, weakening in older stages. Our results show that accuracy in estimating the diversity–AGB relationship varies with plant size, diversity parameters, plot size and forest type.

Abstract Image

热带干旱森林的演替年龄、地块大小和树木大小对多样性与地上生物量之间关系的影响
根据生物多样性与地上生物量(AGB)之间关系的强弱,多样性的丧失可能导致碳储存量的不同程度下降,从而损害森林作为碳汇的作用。本研究评估了影响多样性与 AGB 关系的不同因素,包括小树(直径 7.5 厘米),并考虑了不同的多样性指标(希尔数)、小区面积(80、400 和 1000 平方米)和演替年龄类别(8-22、23-30 和 60 年)。研究比较了落叶林、半落叶林和半常绿林三种热带干燥林的这些关系。结果表明,在有 400 平方米大小的大树的地块中,偏差值最高(d2 = 40.4),如果包括小树(d2 = 25.8),偏差值则会降低。较高的偏差值表明大树对 400 平方米地块的多样性和 AGB 的贡献较大,而较低的偏差值表明小树对多样性的贡献较大,但对 AGB 的贡献有限。只分析大树时,偏差随着希尔数的增加而减小。然而,当希尔数越高时,加入小乔木会增加偏差。这是因为小树和大树的丰度对 AGB 的影响更大。多样性-AGB关系在半落叶林中更为普遍和强烈,半落叶林具有明显的地形和演替年龄差异。多样性-AGB效应在演替早期最强,在演替晚期减弱。我们的研究结果表明,估计多样性-AGB 关系的准确性随植物大小、多样性参数、小区面积和森林类型的不同而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Ecology
Plant Ecology 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8.6 months
期刊介绍: Plant Ecology publishes original scientific papers that report and interpret the findings of pure and applied research into the ecology of vascular plants in terrestrial and wetland ecosystems. Empirical, experimental, theoretical and review papers reporting on ecophysiology, population, community, ecosystem, landscape, molecular and historical ecology are within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信