Master–slave elimination scheme for arbitrary smooth nonlinear multi-point constraints

IF 3.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Jonas Boungard, Jens Wackerfuß
{"title":"Master–slave elimination scheme for arbitrary smooth nonlinear multi-point constraints","authors":"Jonas Boungard, Jens Wackerfuß","doi":"10.1007/s00466-024-02463-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nonlinear multi-point constraints are essential in modeling various engineering problems, for example in the context of (a) linking individual degrees of freedom of multiple nodes to model nonlinear joints, (b) coupling different element types in finite element analysis, (c) enforcing various types of rigidity in parts of the mesh and (d) considering deformation-dependent Dirichlet boundary conditions. One method for addressing constraints is the master–slave elimination, which offers the benefit of reducing the problem dimension as opposed to Lagrange multipliers and the penalty method. However, the existing master–slave elimination method is limited to linear constraints. In this paper, we introduce a new master–slave elimination method for handling arbitrary smooth nonlinear multi-point constraints in the system of equations of the discretized system. We present a rigorous mathematical derivation of the method. Within this method, new constraints can be easily considered as an item of a “constraint library”; i.e. no case-by-case-programming is required. In addition to the theoretical aspects, we also provide helpful remarks on the efficient implementation. Among others, we show that the new method results in a reduced computational complexity compared to the existing methods. The study also places emphasis on comparing the new approach with existing methods via numerical examples. We have developed innovative benchmarks which encompass all relevant computational properties, and provide analytical and reference solutions. Our findings demonstrate that our new method is as accurate, robust and flexible as the Lagrange multipliers, and more efficient due to the reduction of the total number of degrees of freedom, which is particularly advantageous when a large number of constraints have to be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":55248,"journal":{"name":"Computational Mechanics","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-024-02463-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonlinear multi-point constraints are essential in modeling various engineering problems, for example in the context of (a) linking individual degrees of freedom of multiple nodes to model nonlinear joints, (b) coupling different element types in finite element analysis, (c) enforcing various types of rigidity in parts of the mesh and (d) considering deformation-dependent Dirichlet boundary conditions. One method for addressing constraints is the master–slave elimination, which offers the benefit of reducing the problem dimension as opposed to Lagrange multipliers and the penalty method. However, the existing master–slave elimination method is limited to linear constraints. In this paper, we introduce a new master–slave elimination method for handling arbitrary smooth nonlinear multi-point constraints in the system of equations of the discretized system. We present a rigorous mathematical derivation of the method. Within this method, new constraints can be easily considered as an item of a “constraint library”; i.e. no case-by-case-programming is required. In addition to the theoretical aspects, we also provide helpful remarks on the efficient implementation. Among others, we show that the new method results in a reduced computational complexity compared to the existing methods. The study also places emphasis on comparing the new approach with existing methods via numerical examples. We have developed innovative benchmarks which encompass all relevant computational properties, and provide analytical and reference solutions. Our findings demonstrate that our new method is as accurate, robust and flexible as the Lagrange multipliers, and more efficient due to the reduction of the total number of degrees of freedom, which is particularly advantageous when a large number of constraints have to be considered.

Abstract Image

任意平滑非线性多点约束的主从消除方案
非线性多点约束对各种工程问题的建模至关重要,例如在以下情况下:(a) 连接多个节点的单个自由度以模拟非线性关节;(b) 在有限元分析中耦合不同的元素类型;(c) 在部分网格中强制执行各种类型的刚度;(d) 考虑与变形相关的 Dirichlet 边界条件。解决约束条件的一种方法是主从消元法,与拉格朗日乘法器和惩罚法相比,该方法具有减少问题维度的优点。然而,现有的主从消除法仅限于线性约束。在本文中,我们引入了一种新的主从消除法,用于处理离散化系统方程组中的任意平滑非线性多点约束。我们对该方法进行了严格的数学推导。在这种方法中,新的约束条件可以很容易地被视为 "约束库 "中的一个项目;也就是说,不需要逐个进行编程。除了理论方面,我们还提供了有效实施方面的有益意见。其中,我们表明,与现有方法相比,新方法降低了计算复杂度。研究还强调通过数值示例将新方法与现有方法进行比较。我们开发了包含所有相关计算特性的创新基准,并提供了分析和参考解。研究结果表明,我们的新方法与拉格朗日乘法器一样精确、稳健和灵活,而且由于减少了自由度总数而更加高效,这在需要考虑大量约束条件时尤为有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Mechanics
Computational Mechanics 物理-力学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
12.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The journal reports original research of scholarly value in computational engineering and sciences. It focuses on areas that involve and enrich the application of mechanics, mathematics and numerical methods. It covers new methods and computationally-challenging technologies. Areas covered include method development in solid, fluid mechanics and materials simulations with application to biomechanics and mechanics in medicine, multiphysics, fracture mechanics, multiscale mechanics, particle and meshfree methods. Additionally, manuscripts including simulation and method development of synthesis of material systems are encouraged. Manuscripts reporting results obtained with established methods, unless they involve challenging computations, and manuscripts that report computations using commercial software packages are not encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信